Time to change the record – Froch ‘BEAT’ Dirrell
By Liam Santiago: I am sick and tired of hearing people saying Andre Dirrell beat Carl Froch. It is really starting to boil my kettle. Recently Dirrell’s trainer or advisor or whatever has claimed Froch was beaten. Amir Khan has also stated his thoughts on a ‘hometown decision’. Bo**ocks! Froch beat him clearly. On my card is was by two rounds. Dirrell came on strong in the late rounds, but that is not enough.
I am also sick and tired of fighters who take a beating throughout the whole bout, then win the last two rounds and claim they have won. That is what Dirrell did. Froch bossed him through the fight, Dirrell came on very strong in the last two rounds, so he thinks he has won. The same thing happened with Paul Smith vs Tony Quigley. Quigley totally dominated Smith. However, Smith won the last two very convincingly and the judges gave it to him.
The commentary from John Rawling did not help the critics. It was damn ridiculous. He stated Froch was getting out boxed and missing with everything. At the start of round 8 I muted my television and watched the fight in peace. Anyhow, Dirrell was beaten. Simple. Froch won. It is now time for all the bitter Froch hater’s to change the record and look forward to Froch vs Kessler and Dirrell vs Abraham.