Calzaghe Needs To Man-Up and Fight Pavlik

calzaghe5435643.jpgBy Chris Williams: Sounding a more than a little defensive and angry in an interview with The Sun, undefeated Joe Calzaghe (45-0, 32 KOs) ripped into middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik (34-0, 30 KOs), saying that Pavlik declined to fight him after he made an effort to fight him just after he (Calzaghe) had defeated Jeff Lacy back in 2006. Rather than fight him, Calzaghe points out, Pavlik chose to fight Jermain Taylor, who Pavlik beat twice. Calzaghe claims that after Pavlik defeated Gary Lockett in June 2008, he failed to approach Calzaghe about a fight. It was only after Calzaghe signed for a fight with the 39 year-old Roy Jones Jr. (52-4, 38 KOs), that Pavlik “started to get brave,” Calzaghe says. What Calzaghe says seems somewhat odd, however, because Pavlik had previously shown great interested in fighting Calzaghe before and after the fight with Lockett, and would seen curious that Calzaghe believes that Pavlik wasn’t interested in a fight.

Pavlik, arguably the best fighter in the middleweight division, has been interested in a fight with Calzaghe for well over a year, something that most boxing fans are well aware of by now. It was thought that Calzaghe would fight him after Pavlik’s fight with Lockett recently.

read more

Kelly Pavlik – Heir Apparent Or Over hyped Fighter?

pavlik67241.jpgBy Adam Laiolo: To gain the mantle of ‘the next big thing’, the one who will dominant once older or established champions have been beaten, retired or both, you have to make a significant dent in this champions division and be stalking him for one last great throw of the dice, that last bite of glory, bowing out on a high note with pride and reputation intact. This very rarely happens, that last temptation of glory or even a last paycheck to sail off into retirement has got the better of a plethora of former champions and legends of old. Whatever the reasons for this final swansong, it doesn’t, and shouldn’t, damage any reputation of previous glories or conquests.

The champion should, after years of grinding and battling their way to the top, be able to then sit on their throne and choose who and when to fight next, if at all.

read more

Hopkins vs. Pavlik: Will Kelly Beat Bernard Into Retirement?

pavlik562351.JPGBy Jim Dower: With the latest trend in boxing, WBC/WBO middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik (34-0, 30 KOs) has decided on facing a faded star of yesterday, in this case former middleweight champion Bernard Hopkins (48-5, 32 KOs), who is nearing his 44th birthday. The fight might have been supremely interesting eight to ten years ago when Hopkins was in his prime but as of now it’s hard to get excited about it other than the spectacle of it. In one corner you have Pavlik, 26, who is currently in his prime and by far the best fighter in the middleweight division, and in the other you have Hopkins, a fighter who is coming off of a narrow defeat to Joe Calzaghe but who has lost three out of his last five fights.

All things being equal, this would be a fight that Hopkins would be lucky to win even in his prime. However, he’s left his best years behind in the rear mirror years ago and is now sticking around the sport more like a spoiler, making fighters like Calzaghe struggle while at the same time beating pretenders. Pavlik, though, is anything but a pretender, and will be bringing huge power with him in the ring when the two meet on October 18th in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

read more

Pavlik-Hopkins: Kelly Looking To Put The Old Dog Down

pavlik6355.jpgBy Michael Lieberman: With Joe Calzaghe now showing little interest in getting in the ring with undefeated WBC/WBO middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik (34-0, 30 KOs) after his total destruction of Calzaghe’s fellow countryman Gary Lockett in a 3rd round TKO in June, Pavlik has now turned his attention to recent Calzaghe opponent Bernard Hopkins (48-5-1, 32 KOs), who he hopes to take out in an impressive fashion taking Hopkins out so that there’s no question in people’s minds who the better fighter is between them. This is especially important after Calzaghe failed to prove that he is better than Hopkins, and had to struggle to get a 12-round split decision victory in April.

Even more embarrassing for Calzaghe, however, was the fact that he was knocked down by the 43 year-old Hopkins in the 1st round and took punishment for the rest of the way in earning a controversial victory. Pavlik, a knockout artist with enormous power in each hand, is looking to be the first fighter to take Hopkins out, which if he can accomplish this feat with all the clinching and wrestling that Hopkins will likely do, will be something quite extraordinary. At the same time, it will bring heat on Calzaghe by showing how the two fighters did against a common opponent, namely Hopkins.

read more

Has Pavlik Earned The Right to Demand a Bout Against Calzaghe?

pav57273.jpgBy Jonathan Watkins: To become a renowned champion, you must fight your way to the top and then maintain the skills and consistency to stay there. Once accomplished you then have the luxury of sitting at the top of your division and being sought after by up and coming boxers. These fighters, aspiring to become better than the best fighter, have something to prove, unlike the title-holder who has already proven his worth.

A current champion who has come under scrutiny about his choice in fights is one Joseph Calzaghe, the Welshman who boasts a record of 45-0-0. Along with this impressive record, he has held the WBO Super-middleweight title for an astonishing ten years. On the way to earning these credentials he has beaten such fighters as Chris Eubank, Jeff Lacy, Mikkel Kessler, and Bernard Hopkins. Joe Calzaghe’s record speaks for itself.

read more

Calzaghe: Is He Tarnishing His Legacy By Avoiding Pavlik?

calzaghe4631.jpgBy Dan Ambrose: This is a question that has many boxing fans and writers wondering about since undefeated super middleweight Joe Calzaghe decided upon fighting what many people consider to be a faded Roy Jones Jr. rather than a young, 26-year-old undefeated middleweight Kelly Pavlik. Although Calzaghe has made his reasoning pretty clear for deciding not to fight Pavlik – “he’s not ready…he hasn’t proven himself…he turned me down previous…etc” -it doesn’t seem to be making much sense to many people and it’s not pacifying a lot of non-English boxing fans, who see it as something other than what Calzaghe is saying.

It’s strange, though, for Calzaghe has always been a fighter that I personally have considered brave, taking on the toughest super middleweights in the division like Mikkel Kessler and Jeff Lacy. However, the list runs short after those two fighters, and there’s still interest in my part, and other boxing fans, to see whether Calzaghe could prove how good he is by facing a fighter smaller than himself in Pavlik, a middleweight, and who appears to be equally as good. Especially after Calzaghe’s last fight, a 12-round split decision over a 43 year-old American fighter Bernard Hopkins, who not only came close to beating Calzaghe but also knocked him down in the process.

read more

Calzaghe: “I still don’t think Kelly Pavlik has really proven himself”

calzagher5555.jpgBy Dan Ambrose: Sounding a lot like the fox in Aesop’s fable of the “Fox and the grapes,” Joe Calzaghe recently said “I still don’t think Kelly Pavlik has really proven himself,” a comment made to Setanta Sports as a reason for Calzaghe to have bypassed Pavlik and instead choosing to fight the 39 year-old Roy Jones Jr. The comment seems rather disingenuous considering that Pavlik has recently beaten Jermain Taylor, not once, but twice in succession. Calzaghe himself recently defeated Bernard Hopkins, who was twice beaten by Taylor, which makes Calzaghe’s excuse seem a little more than unbelievable.

By seemingly downgrading Pavlik, Calzaghe appears to be denying his desire for something that he perhaps feels that may not have the ability to succeed at. In other words, if you he doesn’t think he could beat Pavlik, then why not fire away at him with comments about him not having proven himself in the past. The problem with that, however, is that few boxing fans appear to be buying what Calzaghe is saying. I can’t see too many people in agreement with Calzaghe on his views about Pavlik not having proven himself, since Pavlik did after all beat Taylor twice, and is about to likely beat Hopkins as well. It just seems like a sad excuse to me, one made in an effort to avoid a harsh reality. Calzaghe, if he truly believes that Pavlik hasn’t proven himself, then he seems to be somewhat deluded, a step behind what’s going on in boxing.

read more

Will Calzaghe be Branded A Coward If He Retires Without Facing Pavlik?

calzaghe335333.jpgBy Michael Lieberman: Undefeated super middleweight Joe Calzaghe (45-0, 32 KOs) has made it no secret that he’d like to retire with his undefeated record intact, and with his boxing legacy unblemished with any ugly defeats that would mar his record. In the past several months, however, he’s been pursued steadily by unbeaten WBO/WBC middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik (34-0, 30 KOs), who has gone to great lengths in order to try and land a fight with him. Even though Pavlik is the smaller fighter, he’s willing to take the risky bout because he knows that he’ll ultimately earn more respect from the boxing public, and be rewarded by receiving even bigger paydays should he come out on the winning end of such a fight.

Calzaghe, though, has opted to take the safe route, taking a nice comfortable bout against the totally shot Roy Jones Jr. on November 8th, at the Madison Square Garden, in New York City, New York. It’ll give Calzaghe, who wants to get as much money he can before retiring from boxing, a nice payday at a minimum of risk. The drawback to that, however, is that it’s not a fight that the boxing public, in large part, want to see, with most of them preferring the try and shut the trap of Pavlik by any means necessary.

read more

Pavlik-Hopkins: Kelly Has All The Advantages

pavlik56235.JPGBy David Lahr: Looking for another big payday, undefeated WBO/WBC middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik (34-0, 30 KOs) will be fighting former middleweight champion Bernard Hopkins (48-5, 32 KOs) on October 18th at Atlantic City, in New Jersey. Having recently defended his title with an impressive 3rd round stoppage of Gary Lockett in June, Pavlik is now ready for some really big money against the 43 year-old Hopkins.

While there are some grumbling among boxing fans about the choice of Pavlik’s opponent, to be sure there isn’t any other top middleweights in the division that can bring in the kind of money that Hopkins can at this point. However, with that said, this is a fight that has mismatch written all over it. Hopkins hasn’t looked impressive in a fight since defeating Antonio Tarver two years ago in 2006, and seems to be declining in his work rate and ability to fight as hard as he used to. With two losses against Jermain Taylor in 2005, a clinch-plagued victory over Winky Wright in July 2007, and then a 12-round split decision loss to Joe Calzaghe in April, (also a fight in which Hopkins clinched often) it seems that Hopkins’ career is on the downward direction.

read more

Calzaghe-Jones, Pavlik-Hopkins, De La Hoya-Pacquiao: Is Boxing In a Race To The Bottom?

jones464346664.jpgBy Tony Krebs: Just looking at the current state of boxing now with fighters like Kelly Pavlik facing 43 year-old former champion Bernard Hopkins rather than other more deserving middleweights, undefeated Joe Calzaghe avoiding his top super middleweight opponents to fight a 39 year-old Roy Jones Jr, and then for the kicker of them all, Oscar De La Hoya taking on Manny Pacquiao, a fighter that he outweighs by 25 lbs. There is certainly a great deal of ridicule that has occurred due to these bouts, as it seems to have made a mockery of the different weight classes, removing established weight boundaries, turning things into a state of chaos in which only what brings about the most money seems to count.

Forget about taking on your number one mandatory, these fighters seem to be out for one thing – the most money they can get for a fight. I suppose it wouldn’t matter so much if it didn’t affect other fighters in their weight classes, ones that are being overlooked just so these fighters can get a chance for a big payday. However, I don’t see it as being fair to the other fighters in the division, nor to boxing either. If someone like Kelly Pavlik, the WBC/WBO middleweight champion, is taking on fighters like Hopkins as 170, what happens to other fighters that may have had a chance to show their talent if given the chance against Pavlik?

read more