Hearn questions Moton’s level and earnings as fighter rejects claim publicly
Curmel Moton fired back at Eddie Hearn after the promoter questioned his ability and earnings. The response came within hours of Hearn suggesting Moton had earned only a few thousand dollars.
Hearn made the remarks while discussing a potential fight between Moton and his fighter Giorgio Visioli, casting doubt on whether Moton is worth the risk or the money being discussed. He said he would consider offering “a couple hundred grand” for the fight, but suggested Moton’s team would demand far more despite limited commercial value at this stage.
The Matchroom promoter went further, openly questioning Moton’s ability.
“I don’t even know if he’s any good, to be honest with you,” Hearn said last Saturday night, before estimating Moton may have earned “five grand, 10 grand” for a recent fight while competing on a small show.
That estimate triggered a quick response from Moton on X.
“‘5 grand’ gmfu do yo research before you speak on me,” Moton said, dismissing Hearn’s claim and pushing back on the portrayal of his earning level.
The exchange highlights the difference between how promoters and fighters view risk and value. Hearn made clear that from his side, the fight does not yet justify major money, especially with Visioli still being developed. He also suggested that taking the fight now would be a gamble for Moton’s team, while the matchup could grow into something bigger later.
Hearn’s comments also follow a familiar promotional tactic, where uncertainty is used to control early negotiations and keep purses down while a prospect is still being tested. By talking him down and pointing to small shows, Hearn keeps the price low before any offer gets serious.
Moton’s reply shuts that approach down, signalling he won’t accept that positioning without a fight. His response suggests he sees the situation differently, both in terms of his standing and what he should be paid.
The fight itself remains speculative, but the tone has already shifted as questions about credibility are met with a direct response.