DeGale vs. Wilczewski: James beating Groves to the top
By Scott Gilfoid: James DeGale (10-1, 8 KO’s) is in an excellent position to get a title shot against one of the world champions in 2012 if DeGale can get by European Boxing Union (EBU) super middleweight champion Piotr Wilczewski (29-1, 10 KO’s) on September 17th.
DeGale lost his last fight to George Groves last May by a controversial 12 round decision. The decision was a popular one in England, but elsewhere around the world many boxing fans still saw DeGale winning the fight. The loss hasn’t knocked DeGale down in the rankings. Indeed, if anything, DeGale is doing even better than before. Groves didn’t get a bounce that you would think he might have and still languishing at the bottom of the rankings by IBF and WBC.
DeGale said this to Sky Sports News “I’ve learned a lot from the Groves fight. Obviously cutting down the ring and throwing a lot more punches is the first thing, while keeping a good defense. When I boxed Groves, I made the first seven rounds a spar and although I was cutting down the ring, I wasn’t throwing enough punches.”
DeGale treats the loss as a learning experience and realizes how important it is to get rounds under his belt and learn from the experiences to get better. DeGale will obviously beat Groves to the top and that’s not just because DeGale is a couple of years older; it’s because he’s got huge talent and other people can recognize that. He just needs a good trainer and more experience he’ll be a champion in no time.
Wilczewski doesn’t have much power and is going to have problems with DeGale’s power and pressure that he puts on him in this fight. Wilczewski won’t have many options to fall back on. He can’t run because DeGale has been working overtime at cutting off the ring and applying pressure on his opponents. Wilczewski can’t stand and trade, because DeGale is too strong. If he does that, DeGale will mow him down quickly.
DeGale will get to the top, win a title and maybe show some generosity to Groves by giving him a shot a title. I don’t know DeGale will do this, because I certainly wouldn’t. Groves didn’t want to give DeGale a rematch after winning a controversial decision, so I think it’s only fair to have DeGale leave Groves out in the cold and let him fend fror himself and languish on the bottom of the division.

please use above banner to link back to us!
james degale is the man and will be a world champion.a loss is a minor setback,just ask nigel benn.
This is one of main the problems with bxing and why its not as popular as it should be. Degale just lost his british title to groves, yet degale gets a shot at the european title. how does that work. In no other sport does the loser get to move up whilst the winner doesnt get a shot. disgusting.
this article is well off the mark … degale was way too static in the groves fight … he did no where near enough to get a contraversial decision in that fight he was fighting like an amatuer for at least half of it … all that bad mouthing groves before the fight (the most excessive it gets from a fighter (apart from haye, ha) and then he produced that joke performance. hes far from ready for kessler.
He likes Degale because like Khan, he will more than likely cross over and fight in America.
And Gilfoid, how can you give an analysis on a fight when I bet you haven’t even seen this Wilczewski fight.
You are a good writer, but write about something you have no idea about!
as soon as he wins a world championship belt your going to hate him.
degal needs a warm up fight 1st! cnt fight for belt after a loss!! gilfoid why do u like degale so much wen u always hate on the brits!! your wierd
Is this one of those same European belts that you are so dismissive about with other fighters….. Junk article as usual.
did not think you could fight for the euro belt coming off a loss so what about that giford
De Gale is a joke, looked scared against Groves in his last fight. Next Audley Harrison from the UK (and I’m a British boxing fan!)
scott gillford hates white people
scott’s dream orgy = degale, dirrell and ward.