Kessler: “Froch doesn’t fight well going backwards”

Photo: Tom Casino/Showtime – By Scott Gilfoid: The new World Boxing Council (WBC) super middleweight champion Mikkel Kessler (43-2, 32 KO’s) summed up one of the biggest problems that former WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch (26-1, 20 KO’s) had last night in their Super Six tournament fight in MCH Messecenter Herning, in Herning, Denmark, saying “Froch doesn’t fight well going backwards.” I’m in agreement with that. Froch looked bad in getting backed up against Kessler much of the night, and wasn’t able to punch effectively when backing up and being pressured by Kessler. When the 32-year-old Froch would throw punches backing up, he lacked accuracy and power.

This is something that Froch and his trainer should have considered when they opted to box with Kessler instead of using his usual slugging style of fighting. I noticed in Froch’s fights with Jean Pascal, Jermain Taylor and Andre Dirrell that Froch couldn’t fight well backwards. They should have just scrapped the idea of boxing Kessler and just went after him all night long. I still think Froch would have lost the fight, but I think it would have been a lot closer unless he got knocked out. Froch ended up losing by a 12 round unanimous decision to Kessler by the scores of 117-111, 115-113 and 116-112.

What I noticed is that Froch didn’t have any snap on his jab whatsoever. He basically pawed with it all night long, using it as a big stick to try and keep Kessler on the outside instead of snapping it with authority. That’s not how you throw a jab and it didn’t work. Kessler got by Froch’s jab every time he wanted to. Froch might as well have not jabbed at, because it was not effective in controlling Kessler or keeping him pinned to the outside. Also, Froch’s accuracy was plain horrible. It wasn’t as if Kessler was using a lot of movement or anything.

For the most part, Kessler was right there in front of Froch all night long, going right at Froch and trying to take his head off with big shots. But Froch, again and again, missed badly with lunging punches that made him look more than a little uncoordinated. The accuracy just wasn’t there for Froch last night. Believe me, there were some rounds that I would have given to Froch had he not looked so clumsy in missing so many punches. Kessler was much more accurate with his shots and a lot better on defense as well. Froch’s defense was nonexistent because he, like he always does, had his hands low during the fight and was getting tagged by Kessler because of it.

Froch says “I’ll definitely be back.” I don’t know about that. He may be back, but I think he’s going to lose his next fight to Arthur Abraham unless he fixes his low guard, his poor jab and his crummy accuracy. I mean, Abraham will be there right in front of him all night long just holding his guard up. If Froch can’t find him with his shots I don’t know what to think. In Froch’s fight with Andre Dirrell, I wasn’t really surprised that he was missing with a lot of his punches, because Dirrell, after all, is a very elusive fighter and hard to hit. However, Kessler isn’t all that hard to hit, and yet Froch was whiffing over and over again with big lunging shots that missed by a mile. Froch has to fix that accuracy against Abraham or else he’ll likely get out-pointed again. Heck, what am I talking about? I think Froch might get knocked out in that fight. Abraham hits like a mule kicks and Froch appeared to get hurt by Kessler a couple of times last night.

Be Sociable, Share!

Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

11 Responses to “Kessler: “Froch doesn’t fight well going backwards””

  • marcomann77 says:

    pac man all the way even though he is lighter he would deystroy all these guys bernard hopkins also would give these fighters a run for there money

  • Kristoffer says:

    Kesslers cut was NOT made by Froch, it was made from headbuts in kesslers fight against Ward!!!!

  • R J Hill says:

    What fighter does fight well going backward?You dont have any leverage going backward in retreat.

  • Anonymous says:

    I’m a big Froch fan but I don’t think it was home cooking, more a case of the crowd influencing the judges.
    Every time Kessler came forward in his flurries the crowd went wild, but in truth a lot of those punches never connected or never connected fully.
    Froch rocked Kessler several times in that scrap, heavy, heavy shots much cleaner than Kesslers ones, but did not let his hands go enough or close the deal like he could have. If that fight was a minute longer, Kessler would’ve woken up with a crowd around him.
    To be fair though, as it was, Kessler prob just edged it, with his better workrate and more efficient jab.
    Wouldn’t bet on Kessler in a rematch though.

  • Cor Lawson says:

    who was the judge who scored it 117-111, wot a load of bollocks

  • Jasper says:

    If you were not British, Im sure you would be able to recognice Kesslers win. Of course it is an advantage to box in your own backyard however, this bout was not won by the fans or the referees – it was won by Kessler – no doubt!

  • weslad says:

    i agree he will be back,hungrier than ever,needs to get that workrate up tho,

  • David Stevens says:

    Scott

    Were you watching the same fight as everyone else.
    Frotch battered Kessler and if he had cut him earlier in the fight, it would have been stopped. Frotch just didnt start fast enough and kessler had the home advantage.
    Frotch does have a low guard, but thats what makes him exciting to watch. Also i challenge anyone in his weight class to say they have a better chin like Frotch.
    He will definately be back.

  • jimmyconway says:

    Shocking article again. Kessler was strong but look at how beat up he was at the end? Froch is the hardest super-middle out there. Nobody can stop him, I think Kessler is a better fighter than Abraham and I think if we take the fight out of the context of being in Denmark, mark each round on its merits. When I was watching the fight I thought Froch had it by a round. When I watched the fight again, I still scored it 115-114 to Froch. Boxing is still about politics and until judges start judging fights based on what they are watching as opposed to what they are hearing, then fairness will continue to depart the sport.

    Fair play to Mikkel in the way he fought but Im really disappointed because I think if Froch fought him again, he would stop him. Froch showed he is stronger than anyone in this competition but strength and brains aren’t the same thing, and I dont think Froch listened carefully enough to his trainer. If he had then I think he would have come out the right side of that decision.

  • marshall says:

    kessler was banged up home town decision wot goes around comes around.

  • smartz says:

    kessler was hurt more in that fight bt i do think e won…if they had a rematch in nottingham froch would stop him IMO

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!