Pacquiao won’t be able to penetrate Clottey’s clamshell defense

By Dave Lahr: Manny Pacquiao is in for a big surprise on Saturday night when he attempts to go on the attack against former IBF welterweight champion Joshua Clottey. Pacquiao is used to having his way against a recent rag tag variety of beaten up and aging fighters but on March 13th, Pacquiao is going to find that he can’t penetrate through Clottey’s impregnable clamshell defense. I’ve seen Clottey in action in many of his fights, and it’s almost impossible to get shots through Clottey’s high guard and land anywhere to his head.

The only fighter I’ve seen who’s had any small degree of success at getting through Clottey’s guard is former World Boxing Association welterweight champion Antonio Margarito in his 12 round decision win over Clottey.

And the reason Margarito was able to land effectively a small part of the time against Clottey was because he was throwing over 100 punches per round. With that many shots being fired at Clottey in every round, something was bound to get through his guard. Still, at the end of the fight it was Margarito who looked badly beaten up, not Clottey.

In fact, Clottey looked as if he had just gone for brief stroll in the park. His face was totally unmarked and he was barely sweating. That tells you a couple of things. One, Clottey has tough skin because Margarito was able to get through his guard with a number of hard shots in every round. And two, Clottey’s clamshell defense is almost impossible to get through with punches.

With Pacquiao, he’s going to have an even tougher time landing shots because he has such short arms and won’t be able to throw looping shots around the sides of Clottey’s guard the way that Margarito was able to do. Pacquiao will have to settle for just jumping around from side to side to try and get to the sides of Clottey’s clamshell defense. I don’t see it happening.

Clottey will shut Pacquiao down almost completely, and then rake him with shots to the head. Once Clottey starts walking Pacquiao down, the Filipino fighter is going start getting tagged a lot and beaten up. Ricky Hatton and Miguel Cotto both failed when trying to pressure Pacquiao. However, neither of them had the clamshell defense working for them.

In Hatton’s case, he was almost completely defenseless out there against Pacquiao, because Hatton foolishly made the mistake of trying to throw hooks. That didn’t work and he quickly was taken out by Pacquiao. Clottey is a whole different ballgame entirely. He knows how to block punches, so when he comes forward raining shots on Pacquiao, it won’t be a case of him taking big shots to the head the way that Hatton was in his 2nd round knockout loss last year to Pacquiao.

Clottey is going to end up shutting Pacquiao down completely the same way that Winky Wright shut down Felix Trinidad years ago, sending him into retirement. Once Pacquiao realizes he can’t land anything, he’s going to get desperate and will ask his Freddie Roach for help. Roach won’t have a clue I’m afraid. Oh, I know Roach will have a lot to say, but his advice will be completely worthless because Pacquiao won’t be able to pry Clottey’s clamshell open.


Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

91 Responses to “Pacquiao won’t be able to penetrate Clottey’s clamshell defense”

  • Rob says:

    Dave Lahr has quit writing for good due to his horrendous predictions and nonsensical articles

  • ahahaah says:

    hehehe stick now your head between your legs or worst in your arseee!!! but dont commit suicide…hahaha another excuse? oh pac fought clottey at 147 catchweight and clottey looks drained and small for pacman..LMAO!

  • Speaz says:

    Agreed.

  • Anonymous says:

    great article!!!! Clottey will destroy the pilipino in 5-6 rounds. Clottey will land some super hard punches to pac´s big head

  • boxingfan#1 says:

    So Cotto was able to beat or at the very least fight Clottey to a draw but Manny won’t be able to do anything against Clottey. This writer is an idiot. As a matter of fact all you folks saying Clottey is definitely going to win are idiots. I don’t think you know jack about the sport of boxing and I sure as hell hope your not gambling men.

  • guest says:

    hey squak! you are just exactly like dave lahr!!! brainless! you hate it that pacquiao fought cotto at a catchweight and yet you are all praises to floyd chicken who came in two pounds over the agreed weight against marquez!!!!

  • BattleCat says:

    Rag tag opponents??? How old are you nine???

  • Speaz says:

    Ahem,

    To whom it applies…

    I’m going to assume that you’re an adult, so I’ll try to talk to you like one. Ok here it goes…when someone says something like…lets take for instance “Pacquiao is overrated”…ok…that’s not whining. That’s whats called *stating their opinion*.

    When someone states their opinion…ok…and you’re immediate response when it isn’t an opinion that you share is “Stop whining”, what you’re really saying is “Stop saying things that I don’t agree with and don’t want to hear”…which ironically enough is technically whining, because as opposed to offering a valid counterpoint, you’re basically just making noise to drown out what you don’t want to hear.

    Now, with that said…going forward…

    Lets say for instance, someone actually compliments your favorite fighter, but you aren’t particularly happy with the way they complimented him. As adults do we

    A. Except the fact that we disagree on somethings
    B. Look to get the other person to agree with you 100%
    C. Blurt out “Stop whining”
    D. Blame Floyd Mayweather

  • darkInside says:

    bottomline is that this fight won’t be an easy one for either fighter..

  • gard says:

    @Bob’s Friend

    I agree,except for the last line.The May 1st fight is still in limbo,IMO. Something still CAN happen,and it will depend on the outcome of the March 13 fight.So Mosley can still be in the WW being ducked.

  • Bob's Friend says:

    More whining.

  • LitsonManok says:

    Pacquiao is overrated. Arum and Roach knows it. They will never ever ever pit Pac against a fighter in his prime, especially those who are nimble on their feet.

  • waltz says:

    @ Fighter
    lol. that was such a bad and a poor reply.

    still, boxing fans > fighter fans. since you are a boxing fan, let go of the flaming.

  • gard says:

    At some point in the fight that clamshell has to open to garner
    some points,and besides the body will be there to hit.

  • legal32 says:

    Clottey should win this fight. The only thing that troubles me is that he appears to be too deferential to Manny. I suspect it is because they are from the same camp. Needless to say, I don’t see the arrogance that he will need to beat Manny. He’s bigger, stronger and a better all around boxer. The only advantage that Manny has is speed which might be nullified by Clottey’s defense and counter-punching. I hope Clottey exposes Pac.

  • Fighter says:

    Bob. I’m impressed. Funny how you got all this experience, but every post you make lacks education with regard to the art of combat. There’s no need to try to impress us. I don care what you say. I know what I’ve done in my life. I don’t need to come here and try to impress. Like I said. If you can’t provide intelligent commentary on the subjects, don’t adress me. You are a clown. I guarantee you would last no more than two minutes where I’m from. I’m here to discuss boxing. You’re a typical internet thug, telephone tuffguy, sitting berhind your keyboard, trying to convince us, and yourself, that you are…what you’re not. You’re a B/tch. If we were face to face I would tell you, and knowing what I do, there’s not a thing you would do. You notice, I don;’t initiate tuffguy talk. Not what I’m about. You’re a little napoleon type angry man. You/re a lame assed clown, with a quater ounce of boxing knowledge; stick to what you know…clown.

  • oldSchool says:

    I understand being a fan is important and that every fighter has his day, but on paper clottey seems to easy but all who follow boxing knowthe guys been robbedbefore and could b again. Manny should win but that does not mean he will.

  • lacem up says:

    @SPEAZ

    yes , im old enough…i remember that exact aron pryor fight !! his corner said “get me that jug”..some one else said “what jug”…his response was “the one i mixed up “….people are in denial if they think current standards are enuff for testing in boxing !! only cheaters dont want more thourogh and random testing…

  • Jorge says:

    LOL at Tyler Comments!

    People have the right to think whatever they want to think its called freedom of speech.
    Its not that serious.

  • Manong Tagacebu says:

    PacFAN says:
    March 10, 2010 at 11:04 am

    Nuff Said…

    Pac = Fighter of the Decade
    Pac = 7 Division Champion
    Pac = Fighter of The Year
    Pac = All Time Great
    ========================

    I agree with the first 3 statements. But All Time Great? Even Pacquiao doesn’t consider himself THAT great.

  • Tyler says:

    To all,

    of you who thinks this fight is a mismatch and a sure win for pacquiao. and clottey is such an easy opponent. and you dont give a sh*t on even buying the PPV, then why you all take time writin here. just STFU and mind your own damn businesses, if uv got the fight all figured out then bet your house and your wife’s mom on it. smartaS*es

  • Tyler says:

    i understand your sentiments davey boy, being such a lowly blogger that you are and probably wouldnt be credentialed in any big boxing match. who can blame you? you have no other choice but bash on the most popular boxer in pacquiao in order to have some internet hits for your blogs.
    again and again pacquiao proved you wrong and make you look stupid. but i guess youre used to that by now. how pathetic

  • darkInside says:

    and to all the haters.. we know that you won’t have anything good to say about pacman.. he may beat up superman but still it won’t be enough.. we, the fans of pacman, are just secured in the knowledge that you haters may not acknowledge his accomplishment but the boxing establishment do not turn a blind eye on these accomplishment and the number of awards given him is sufficient enough..

    now for the clottey fight, i’m sure roach knows how stiff of a defense clottey have and i’m sure that he is good enough to find a way to dismantle this defense.

  • primemover says:

    dave, whats got in your head that you cant get out of the pacman… come sunday, all your articles will say it was clottey’s mistake that he lost the fight… you will never ever get the pacman credit… how pathetic..

  • darkInside says:

    this writer (not so sure though) just can’t make up his mind.. a couple of articles before he is spouting that clottey’s not enough to be on the same ring as the pacman.. and now he’s predicting the opposite.. i wish he’d do the same thing that other ‘retired’ writers of this site did and promise to not write again if pacman wins.. or maybe ‘experience’ already taught ‘him’ something.. right? :D

  • Squak says:

    This is not even a fight worth buying when we all know CLOTTEY wa cherry picked. This fight is a joke, I would feel bad for CLOTTEY but he’s geting a big PAYDAY. PAC is gonna win, i dont think it will be by knock out, but he will win, who knows CLOTTEY might take a dive. But we all know PAC wont fight someone on the level, I still cant believe he needed a catchweight for a damaged COTTO. I wont consider him P4P king unless he really steps up. Now Floyd is fighting the man PAC ducked, and he’s fighting for SHANE’s belt and without a catchweight, now i consider that to be P4P material

  • Speaz says:

    lacem up

    I think that fight (for better or worse) raised a lot of questions in the fight community. Remember how Aaron Pryor infamously walked through those hellacious punches from Alexis Arguello back in their fights?

    Then, the whole Panama Lewis controversy exploded over the “mixed” contents in the water bottle Pryor had in the corner (fighters are only allowed water in the corner). Then shortly after that, more and more info started to come out about Aaron Pryor’s substance abuse. I’m willing to give Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt, but I think a lot of people are looking at the fact that Marquez backed him up for 11 rounds with a broken nose, and Morales was able to keep him a bay in their first fight. Those fights were at ’25 and ’30, so people are thinking to themselves…ok what changed here? It could just be because both of those guys are tactical counter punchers, so I’ll give Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt, but when you look and see that he has two KO 3′s on his record at 110 and 112, people are going to ask the question…especially when you move up, get stronger and you never seem to tire in your fights. Still, I’ll give Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt. Those KOs were early in his career and I’m not really sure what kind of amateur career he had before them. He really isn’t a non stop fighter either like I initially thought. He usually throws in 15-30 second spurts, and then spends a lot of time and energy (a lot of it wasted) bouncing around his opponent (almost pretending to be a boxer vs a brawler). I think this is something that Roach put in when he started working with him and he’s still learning it…footwork, movement setting up the left with the right hand etc…I wish he would stop doing it because it looks silly sometimes, but no question, working with Roach has made him a better boxer…so if it aint broke then no need to fix it for my entertainment. Pac has definitely developed as a boxer under Roach, even if it looks akward at times, so much respect to him for working to step up his game after Morales I.

    Then I think…I remember how Mosley was a hellacious puncher at lightweight. He had great speed, and was already a good boxer. When he moved up (and bulked up), he wasn’t blowing through guys like Pacquiao is now. That’s usually the norm for fighters moving up. People expect to see some compromise…even from a world class fighter like Shane.

    Now, it could just be the level of competition Pacquiao has been facing (shot Oscar, shot Hatton, shot Castillo, damaged and retiring in two fights Cotto). Maybe Pac just struggles against counter punchers and he hasn’t really faced one in awhile and that’s why he’s been looking so good lately. He hasn’t really fought a good counter puncher since Marquez. Castillo was a good counter puncher (back in the day), but he’s been shot since the suspension. Pac is usually wide open when he throws because of the odd angles he throws punches from. A disciplined counter puncher can catch him all night long fairly easily. Cotto wasn’t in trouble with Pacquiao until Cotto got wild and got caught. When Pac landed, he wanted to brawl and got beat to the punch, and that fight was basically over after that.

    Cotto was also coming off of Mosley and Clottey so you have to wonder how much he had in the tank. Remember Cotto had some stiff fights earlier in his career too (Torres, Pinto, Quintana, Judah…and so on). Cotto has been hurt bad before several times and the Magarito assault should have got Magarito jail time. In my oppinion, he should never get a license to fight in the states again and he should consider himself fortunate he’s not in jail if in fact he has used those wraps before which I believe he has. Think about it. Magarito was a compubox wonderkid that just threw a lot of punches. That’s what made him such a good sparring partner for De la Hoya. Then all of a sudden he has guys bleeding from the nose, eyes and ears…and then remember the cauliflower ear fight where he basically knocked the guys ear off? We may never know, but if I never see him fight again, I wouldn’t be disappointed. So, in light of all of that, I’ll give Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt, but his actions have indeed been suspect. I hope it’s all been hype. It does make more sense to have these fight take place before Pac v May, so maybe it still happens, but if it is in fact hype, I think it’s boiled over and has gotten out of hand. Kind of like Clooney and Holmes. Remember all the racial tension around that fight back during the run-up? Was hoping to never see that again…but I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.

  • Arnel says:

    Just prepare for the hate train come sunday morning (maybe even right after the fight) from all of these writers on how Clottey was defeated…(take your pick)
    a. too slow
    b. mismatch
    c. a virtual unknown
    d. pac on PEDS
    e. ANYTHING THAT WILL MAKE MANNY LOOK BAD!

    My money’s on e.

  • x-man says:

    ha,ha guess you never seen much of pac fighting.the clam very expose.also he has this fake and dig should be perfect for cottey,haven seen that punch in about 7 fight hope to see that awesome ko.

  • Bob's Friend says:

    To The Fighter

    What would you say if Manny beats Floyd. After all your facts pointing out Manny’s flaws and all your facts pointing out Floyd’s greatness what would you say?

    You are setting yourself up. I watched on youtube.com a lot of people who said that Mosley and Margarito and Clottey could not knock Cotto out therefore Manny would not be able to hurt Cotto. After the fight they could not man up and accept that they were wrong and had there excuses ready.

    If Manny beats Floyd here is what you are most likely to say:

    - Floyd was past his prime
    - Mosley soften Floyd up
    - Pacquiao was using steroids
    - Floyd was robbed
    - It was a lucky punch
    - Floyd had a off night
    - Manny needs to now fight Paul
    Williams to prove that he is the best

    You, Mr. Fighter, I am sure were one of the people who said that the Oscar Pacquiao fight was a miss match – after Manny destroyed Oscar you then changed your story and belittled his accomplishment by saying Oscar was weigh drained, old and was cherry picked.

    For all your facts, Mr. Fighter, you are biased because no matter what Manny does you will always belittle his accomplishments.

  • curt20 says:

    I agree with fighter too much credit is being given to manny for wins against fighters who were no longer at their best Barera and Morales were great fighters but they were not at their best when manny came along and Morales still managed to beat Manny.. To date Marquez is Manny’s only opponent who was at the top of his game and that’s why manny had so much trouble with him the rest of Manny’s fights was just good match making they picked the fights that his style could take advantage of that’s why he stayed away from Chris John, Joan Guzman, Zahir Raheem those guys would have made manny look bad with their defense and counter punching.. If clottey follows Cotto’s round 1 then he wins easy Cotto did a good job of keeping his hands high and using his jab in the 1st round and won that round easy and could’ve dominated the fight with that but he let manny bait him into a brawl when manny laid on the ropes and let cotto bang it opened cotto up to an exchange you can’t do that with a fighter with Manny’s speed cotto got hit 4 and 5 times during short exchanges while only getting off 2 or 3 shots that did nothing..

  • Bob says:

    Fighter both Floyd and Manny beat an old out of shape Delahoya. Delahoya lost the heart to train and fight after the Mayorga fight. That’s the fact. If you think Manny has problems with taller boxer’s than you no nothing and shouldn’t post here. Manny has boxed years and I can guarrante you that he has put ass whippings to taller fighter’s in and out of the gym. I’ve been a fighter myself Amatuer and I was good, I have also been a trainer that have coach my nephew to 4 national titles. So I believe I know the fight game much better that a 360xbox fighter.

  • Me says:

    nothing has change DAVE LAHR is still an IDIOT ANIM@1.

  • Ken D. says:

    Who hired this writer?, Are they evaluating the column before they put out to the public, because it sucks !!!!

  • Kid Blast says:

    huh

  • davelahrisbrilliant says:

    wow… you just outdo yourself with every “article” you put out. the hatred/jealously or whatever you have for pacquiao is pretty sad. it’s as if he stole your girlfriend or is dating your mom or something.

  • Lamotta_91 says:

    Pacquiao vs Clottey should be a great fight however im looking forward to the Jose Louis Castillo vs Alfonso Gomez fight more!

  • Ness says:

    I agree with you a 100%. I find myself spending more time discussing fighters you menting from the 90′s than I do the current crop.

    Another thing… remember the undercards that Don King just to put together…. back in the days, it was a party, today it’s a get together with friends.

    Peace and keep posting!!!!!

  • JesusJones says:

    Nice work Speaz but I think it’s why the game plan is to fight him on the outside??????????

  • Francisco says:

    Why do you assume pacquiao will be head hunting?

  • lacem up says:

    i just watched pac cotto , the entire fight for the first time.. ive seen clips b4 thou..im still on the fence about pacman however..mayweather would be a good test for pac..i just dont see how a fighter like pac can be at best average for his entire career then just walk thru these hard punchers..i seen cotto land some real hard punches and it doesnt even phase pac..im suspitious..ive watched boxing for over 40 years (im aging myself here)..i love to watch pac fight but im a man of integrty too…somethings NOT right about him (pac)..

  • Ness says:

    Speaz… Great analysis! You took me back to the 1999-2005 era.

    Why don’t you get a gig in this site… not kidding!!!!

    Note to editor…. contact this dude and publish get him on the rooster.

  • Speaz says:

    Interesting analogy with Trinidad v Wright. In hindsight Tito never had the legs to move up past welterweight/superwelter, but it made sense at the time.

    Here’s how it came about and why its relevant today…

    Tito cleaned out the welterweight division at a time when it was just as competitive, if not better than the current welterweight division…and he was still relatively young, so it only made sense to move him up to setup Trinidad v Jones at middleweight.

    At the time, the thought of Trinidad losing before the Jones’ fight was unheard of. He beat De la Hoya back when De la Hoya was actually De la Hoya in what was billed at the time as the fight of the century (definitely the showdown of the decade even though it didn’t live up to the hype). After that, he crushed the young phenom, and one of my favorite fighters at the time, Fernando Vargas. Remember, Vargas was somewhat of the Tiger Woods of boxing at the time…the youngest US amateur champ ever…the youngest Junior Middleweight champ of all time…undefeated as a pro. Add to that, Tito’s wins over Whitaker, Pendleton, Campas, and Camacho before De la Hoya and pretty much no one thought Tito could be stopped before the Jones fight.

    Then along comes the Hopkins fight which was supposed to be nothing more than a tune-uo for Trinidad v Jones, but little did we know at the time, that Hopkins (who was basically making his bones fighting relative unknowns) had other plans. Not many people thought that Hopkins could befuddle Tito with defense and counter punching but he did…to the point were Tito basically gave up mentally halfway through the fight and began to break down before Hopkins finally put him down. The thing about that fight that annoyed me most is that when there wasn’t a clear target, Tito just wouldn’t throw. In order to beat a guy like that you have to throw, even when there is no target. Hit his arms, his elbows…anything, just work. That’s what Jermaine Taylor did against Winky Wright and he was dominating that fight before the headbutt…I can’t stand when fighters don’t work. Anyway, back to the analogy.

    After the Hopkins loss, Tito goes into retirement and actually came back boxing a lot better. He had good movement against Mayorga and actually looked like he worked on his footwork and jab. He destroyed Mayorga, but he actually did it looking like a boxer puncher instead of just a brawler which was impressive. So bring on Jones (who had been starched himself by Tarver) right? Not so fast.

    Wright v Trinidad was supposed to be another tune-up fight for Trinidad v Jones (the comeback plan was to fight Jones all along). It made sense at the time. Tito had CRUSHED Vargas before his retirement and Vargas beat Wright (barely). Sort of like how Pacquiao CRUSHED Cotto, but Cotto beat Clottey (barely).

    In theory, since Tito beat Vargas (down), and Vargas beat Wright, then Tito should’ve been able to blow Wright out of the water right? Negative. Someone hit the nail right on the head earlier when they said styles make fights and as it turns out, Wright’s style was all wrong for Trinidad.

    Vargas was an offensive fighter, so he was taylor made for a power puncher like Tito. Wink was a defensive counter puncher which is the last thing Tito needed to see, but if he was going to fight the speedy counter puncher Jones in a megafight, then he had to get the Wright tune-up in. Sound familiar to a similar situation in boxing today? At the time, no one cared about Winky Wright. He was supposed to be this guy who was too slow, with no offense, no power, who didn’t throw combinations etc… Turns out, he practically shut Tito out on the scorecards in much the same way as Hopkins.

    Fast forward a couple of years…

    Pacquiao beats down Cotto, but before setting up a potential megafight with the speedy counter punching Mayweather, he turns to a guy that Cotto has already beaten. No problem right? Afterall, Pacquiao did beat Cotto down, so why not get a tune-up in with a defensive minded former champ that Cotto already dispatched of. This time instead of Wright (Vargas leftovers), it’s Clottey (Cotto leftovers). After all, who cares about Clottey? He’s slow, doesn’t throw combinations right, doesn’t punch with the same pop as Cotto right? He’s going to be right there in front of Manny all night right? Almost seems like a rerun. There are actually a lot more similarities…but I won’t go into them all. I actually think it’s a pretty good analogy based on those things alone.

    One difference with Clottey though is Clottey will give up the body, because his arms aren’t as long as Wink’s and he doesn’t move as good as Hopkins or Wright. Clottey at times does like to brawl too, but it’s more like Erik Morales, and Arturo Gatti, where if you hit them, they feel the need to answer back right away. Clottey reminds me alot of Winky Wright. He loves to sit in that turtle shell and then smile at you and let you know just how much you didn’t hurt him after you flurry. Then come right back and steal rounds.

    If Pac is having a hard time touching the body, or the ref doesn’t let him work, this fight could turn tactical quick. If the ref is someone like Kenny Bayless, watch out…Pac could be in for a long night. Clottey lands heavy combos and they could be just as eye popping as Pac’s. if Clottey looks physically bigger and looks like he’s backing Pacquiao up, then the scoring could get interesting. If he actually starts to back Pacquiao up, the fight is basically over.

  • Mike says:

    Manny has beaten excellent fighters,period!Just becuse a Ricky and Cotto have both been stopped does not make them washed up.After both of their losses they went on to win again and as warriors who want to be among the best they deal with it!
    This fight I see a tough fight for both guys but every time I pick against Manny he shows me something new and impresses me further.Herer’s to a great fight!

  • gary says:

    BTW, you said no one is talking about pac-clottey … you’re right! no one but me, you ….

  • gary says:

    ‘Pacquiao won’t be able to penetrate Clottey’s clamshell defense’ … yup & clottey’s gonna win because of his clamshell defense, right? LET’S GO PACMAN !!!

  • Anders says:

    Why do you hope clottey winns,have something against manny?

  • MoneyPack says:

    MANNY PACQUIAO will not only win this fight but will overwhelm CLOTTEY in a spectacular blitzkrieg offense. Yes, this is definitely worth fifty bucks.

  • Bob's Friend says:

    Fighter, you have a big mouth and you are always whining how Manny gets too much credit. Do you still drink breast milk or maybe someone took away your favorite toy. Don’t cry Floyd is here to tuck you into bed. Hush, it’s ok,if you believe really hard like how you believe in Santa Clause then maybe Manny wont win any more fights. Ok. Now go to sleep. Thank you Uncle Floyd, I will tell all the kids in the playground that you will beat the evil Manny.

  • C-Rock says:

    Manny will break his shall (D) with no real issue if Clottey do not throw alot of punches he will be detroyed!!!!

  • edy-toronto says:

    That’s alright Dave. As long as you do not classify Clottey as “rag tag” after Pacman beats him

  • Fighter says:

    @Anders. I think Manny is the better fighter. Note, I said fighter, not boxer. But seriously, he does have an edge. He does however, have some holes in his defense. I don’t think Clottey is gonna give Manny the savage beating that some people say, but I don’t think it’ll be quite an impressive victory if Manny wins. Clottey is hard as nails. But he’s not quite buisy enough for me to confidently say he’ll win. He hurt Zab, banged up Margarito AND Cotto, which says alot for him. His biggest feather will be his fight against Magacheato. He threw 100 punches /round at Clottey, and he still did quite well. I’ll give it to Manny in a split. Clottey is not getting ko’ed, so forget that. This is not a tomatoe can, as I have passed said of Clottey, and I take that back, he can hurt Manny if he mentally and strategically trains very hard. Clottey is tough, but he’s not a top teir fighter. Simple answer, I think Manny will win. But I sure hope Clottey does.

  • Ness says:

    Is this article meant to fill a quota… you know atleat have someone that sees Clottey win.

    I do think that it will be more competitive that most think… but the more I think about it, the more you have to give it to Pacman.

    After watching “Road to Dallas”, I was left with the impressiont that while Pacman was a top notch professional working team, Cottey has a semi-pro crew that was patch together in the last minute and are clueless.

    If Clottey, pulls this this one off…. we will have to decide if it’s becuase he is that good… or we are just giving Manny too much credit.

  • Jesse says:

    you are a joke pacquioa is going to not only win but he is going to shut down clottey!!!!!

  • Fighter says:

    Huna. Well said. Short, sweet, and accurate. there’s a chance for anything, as I’m sure we all picked Tyson over Douglas, Jones over Tarver, etc, but unless some celestial event occurrs, you got it.

  • Huna says:

    Is Lahr a real boxing reporter or just a Fan writing an essay? Some points may be valid, but the best thing Manny has been doing over the past few years is lining up quality Sparring Partners. As such he will have much more success in breaking down Clottey than Lahr believes. PAC by UD-Wide Margin, Just a better skilled boxer than Clottey.

  • LEE COOOOO says:

    FIGHTER, THATS SOME FUNNY SH*T MANNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anders says:

    Fighter who do you think will win this fight?

  • Fighter says:

    What happened Bob? It seems like every time you getmade to look a fool, you tuck tail, and leave town for a few days. Same thing happened last time. Man-up dude.

  • Fighter says:

    Hey everybody. According to BOOB, Oscar is over 6′ft tall.
    He must be taking HGH or some kind of PED.LMAOLMAO!!!

  • Fighter says:

    10-6.5=?

    a) 6

    b) 5

    c) I LOVE MANNY PACQUIAO!

    d) 3.5

    And remember children, the right answer is not always C ;)

  • Fighter says:

    Bob. Last I checked, Manny was 5’6 and a half. 5’10 minus 5’6.5 = what? Not 6 inches i’ll tell you that. This is my point about pacquiao fans. They’re so arrogantly in allied to Manny, that the facts go by the wayside, only to be replaced by speculations, heresay, and opinions. It’s hard to have a conversation on strategy, and the art of boxing, when people’s judgment are so clouded by infatuation. Do your homework before you post. Really. Men lie, women lie, numbers don’t.

  • Fighter says:

    Bob. You’re right. Oscar was taller than Manny. He was also YEARS past his prime, and it showed in the fight. If you can’t admitt that, than you’re just as biased as the guy who wrote this thing. Clottey’s different. If you notice, he beat a very slick boxer named Zab Judah. You probably were not chasing Pacquiao headlines just yet. My guess is, you started following Pac a year ago, when you first heard of the sport of boxing.

  • Bob says:

    Fighter what was Delahoya 5’2 ? Delahoya was 6 inches taller than Manny, Do your homework before you post

  • taurus says:

    Dave Lahr is just really obsessed with Pacquiao. I bet he is placing his bet against Clottey since he lost already a lot of money betting against Pacquio

  • PacFAN says:

    Nuff Said…

    Pac = Fighter of the Decade
    Pac = 7 Division Champion
    Pac = Fighter of The Year
    Pac = All Time Great

    No Matter What You Said and Hate. These Facts Cannot Be Denied. It is already written.

  • Ant Banks says:

    Mr Lahr, I’ll be waiting patiently for your comments Sunday morning. It will be interesting to see how Clottey is somehow now ‘damaged goods’ and so forth…

  • namo! says:

    @fighter, I’m not calling anybody a hater, I left it up to the writer. I just mentioned my hope that if pac wins that the writer will not downplay the win after what he has written here which is always the case with him.

  • Fighter says:

    I have to say though, the last paragraph of this thing is a bit far off. Winky and trinidad (Trini was also overrated) is a whole different story. You can’t compare Winky to Clottey. Winky is a far supperior boxer, having faced, and defeated far superior competition than Clottey. I highly doubt Clottey will be the one to retire Manny. That is a job left for one of two men: Floyd, or more excitingly..Shane.

  • Nombre says:

    @fighter

    You probably are right. Manny Pacquiao is a great fighter, but in his fights against good technical fighters he’s not very impressive. People need to really check out the Marquez fights again. This guy is a head hunter.

  • Got Skillvoid says:

    Even if he can’t penetrate the clamshell Clottey will need to do more than just block shots to win. If he just stands behind that tight guard all night he will loose a wide UD.

  • Fighter says:

    Name me one fight where Manny focused on the body attack? Manny is a head hunter. He feels compelled to stike back at the head when scored upon. Beginning with his signature, throwing his hands up, or banging them together, as if to say ‘come on’. I don’t think Manny is too intelligent a boxer. i beleive that if he fights a technical fighter, he will be very frustrated, as he himself is technically flawed. I think if goaded into a trading battle, Manny can be exposed by the right guy. Is Clottey that guy? Unlikely. That’s probably why Manny picked him, as a sure thing. Clottey is unlikely the one to expose Manny’s weakness, but it’s not impossible. If Clottey were fighting Shane, Floyd, Collaz, Williams, Martinez, or Berto, this would be a warm up fight. But this actually is a descent fight for a guy like Manny, who is overrated, and underexposed.

  • WWANKAH says:

    Huge, Stronger, Bigger, Nutshell,…what not. However you want to wish, the smaller guy is gonna win by knockout. Pac’s gonna do the same to either Floyd or Moseley and to dave lahr as well.

  • Jimmy M. says:

    oh this guy again!…you have a way of luring me into your articles (even though you dont know much about boxing dave). I dont agree with anything you said. just like in your article about freddy roach and pacmans style of fighting clottey. Manny Pacqauio is a smart fighter, he wont be headhunting all night hoping one or two shots get through his defense. what he might do is go to the body (preferably the ribs) to get clottey elbows down just enough to where manny can work his way up. or he can just work the angles, get around those gloves with hooks. OR anothher way is to throw a couple of punches (doesnt have to land) then step to side, and as clottey moves around to face manny, thats when he (manny) can atack. personally, i would just go to clottey rib and body and work my way up. clottey defense is good if your the type of fighter that can only head hunt and is one dimensional. but pac is too smart and fast for clottey. my prediction, winner, pacqauio by TKO late rounds between 10-12.

  • Fighter says:

    Styles make fights, and he knows that another guy who is willing and able to trade, like Mosley would destroy him. Shane is a strong WW. Manny could’nt cope. H eMIGHT have a chance against Floyd, as Floyd will not press him. Shane is another animal.

  • Fighter says:

    I think Clottey has a chance, but I also think Dom is pretty accurate. If Manny ever gets the stones to fight Floyd, or vice versa. We already know he turned down Shane. No mention of drug tests, purses or nothing. Manny knew right off the cuff, he wanted no part of that sh/t! LOL!!

  • Fighter says:

    One of the reasons Manny might have trouble is hight. I have mentioned some of the flaws in his armor, noow I WILL say this; Manny uses angles in a great way. But I don’t know if he can do this against a guy who has longer reach AND is taller. We’ll see. Freddy said something about Manny staying on the outside. How? He’s too short in this fight to do that.

  • Fighter says:

    I’m so sick of pacfans calling people haters, and liars, and questioning their boxing knowledge because they gie an opinion that is against Pacquiao. These fans are more arrogant than any I’ve ever seen, because they attack anybody who provides a technical, or any other opinion that is not in Pacquiao’s favor. I mean, are you all so in love with a man? Do you adore him so much that you forgot that he’s far from invincable, and has lost 3 times, and drew 2x? I will admitt that Clottey is the underdog, but he still has a chance, as Pacquiao is a flawed fighter. If he studies his tapes, and makes adjustments, he can catch Pacquiao, the same way Morales, and JMM did. They’re not spectacular boxers by any stretch, but they did it. And they did it w/in the last ten years, yet somehow, he gets ‘boxer of the decade?’ Wow!

  • Del says:

    ‘And the reason Margarito was able to land effectively a small part of the time against Clottey was because he was throwing over 100 punches per round. With that many shots being fired at Clottey in every round, something was bound to get through his guard’

    Read that paragraph you just wrote, how many punches does Pacman throw, and how much faster will they be! Come on man, im not saying this is a walk in the park for Pacman and full respect to Clottey but ill take a stoppage in round nine with Clottey in no position to continue!

  • namo! says:

    I just hope this writer remembers all the things he said in this article and not try to downplay things if pacman wins. If he does, it would be like admitting he is just another hater and an ass..le.

  • vinny says:

    This is the same guy that said nobody is talking about Manny vs Clottey. Seems like you keep the conversation alive Dave. You know last time I wrote something like this you deleted it twice. We’ll see if you decide to delete this one again because it states the truth about your obsession with Pacquiao.

  • Ben Thought says:

    Dave Liar again! C’mon just eat clams for your meal. You haven’t changed your style. Still the same … Pacman will never beat anyone according to Dave Liar. So, what happened? Manny is a 7-Division champ in boxing, best boxer of the decade and best boxer of the year 2009! What a writer?

  • jjabrams says:

    this prediction is nothing but a silly attempt to increase page hits. you’re a douche lahr.

  • Dre00 says:

    Funny how you pactards can say “This is gonna be an exciting fight” I mean you have a Clottey that has a very boring fighting style, because usually you pactards call all technician “boring” and yet when the fight between Manny and Floyd was canceled some said “it would have been a boring fight anyways” And please don`t even start by saying Clottey is more exciting than Floyd, the dude is a “TREE” no head movement, no foot work, and i`m positive Manny will trow 6-8 punches and he will trow 1! sorry but very boring!!!

  • Caine says:

    Just enjoy the fight! It will surely be exciting with lots of explosive punches coming from both fighters.

  • Manong Tagacebu says:

    This is Dave Lahr’s prediction on what will happen. In a few nights we will know if Dave is right or not. Can’t wait!!!

    Go PACQUIAO!!!
    Go CLOTTEY!!!

  • gar 30 says:

    All you writers keep going on about how shot Miguel Cotto was when Manny destroyed him. Yet unless I am mistaken Joshua Clottey fought the same Miguel Cotto {post Margarito beating} and lost a close decision,now I am not saying Clottey is a bad fighter,I actually have a lot of respect for him especially his punch resistance but come on, Manny can not hit him? I have never seen Clottey in a fight against good opposition where he has not been hit,that is why he has a reputation for having a good chin,you are talking him up to be a defensive genius,he is no Floyd Mayweather!!!!

  • Clark Kent says:

    … and a reminder to fans: let us just have a good discussion and leave the animosity behind.

  • Clark Kent says:

    I’m honestly unsure about this assessment. What I’m sure of is that Pac’s skill will again be challenged. He also throws a lot of punches per round and in many angles so in that regard, I wouldn’t be sure about such a ‘conclusion’. The good thing about it though is that Clottey presents a different opponent and will now determine Pac’s ring generalship which is underrated since he’s been winning in his past fights, although we saw a glimpse of how smart he is in his fight with Cotto. So in a nutshell, I wouldn’t want to bet on it.

  • Hawaiian Man says:

    Defense Will Not Win A Fight……..Punches Will Score….aloha

  • Ryptox says:

    Huh? Are you kidding? LOL ?

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!