Comments on: Abraham vs. Dirrell: Andre won’t let Arthur get his shots off

By: Tunney

Tunney — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:31:56 +0000

Scott, why do you hate European fighters so much? You bash the Klitschkos, Calzaghe, Kessler, Abraham – every single good European fighter.

Please explain why sometime, will you?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:24:45 +0000

Scott Gilfoid you only write about Dirrell… Plus you have a biased opinion.

By: don@london

don@london — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:00:43 +0000

Sorry, dozed off after reading that article!

By: Future King

Future King — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:15:26 +0000

Please, I cant believe you would even right this scott. Direll has great speed, but cmon why in the world would u put him in the same categorie as the legends? Arthur is good, thats why hes undefeated, plus he fought with a broken jaw and still won, i see a 6th round KO victory Arthur Abraham.

By: No dirrell yes Carl Froch

No dirrell yes Carl Froch — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:09:19 +0000

Carl gave a nice lesson to Dirrel
Abraham will distroy Dirrell’s brain.
scott gliford will keep writing articles..

By: jack

jack — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:02:38 +0000

you’re telling us to get up to speed with the 21st century and dirrell is a modern day boxer, yet you’re comparing him to robinson and ali!

By: Danny*

Danny* — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:56:34 +0000

we’ve still goit another two weeks of the same article to come. ‘Is Dirrell too fast for Arthur?’ etc etc. He might actually win but FFS get a life. I’m looking forward to the next ‘Scott’ (c*nt) article about a Brit boxer…..I reckon it’ll be kel Brook on Monday…..(Is Kel overrated?)…

By: JD

JD — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:27:52 +0000

You sound like a broken record. Find something else to write stupidity about.

By: Daz G

Daz G — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:41:06 +0000

Dirrell has done nothing and your comparing him to the 2 greatest boxers of all times that just shows all of the crack you have been smoking.

“It’s not running, thats what we call boxing.”
Sort your life out, there’s a difference between good movement and running.And again handspeed is nothing without timing and Abraham might not have the speed advantage but if he works the body early in the fight with his power then dirrell might just lose.

By: Ash

Ash — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:29:02 +0000

Footwork like Sugar Ray Robinson or Muhamed Ali, Scott are you high?
Dirrell has excellent movement and speed, of that I’m sure, and he could probably beat Abraham. Let’s not over-rate Dirrell, he’s good, but there’s no way he derserves to be mentioned in the same article as those legends.

By: No Fear

No Fear — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:28:14 +0000

I won’t be watching this fight as I am resolved never to watch Dirrell again. I would not even watch him giving me one million pounds.

I hope AA caves Dirrell’s head in.

By: inkspired

inkspired — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:57:12 +0000

i hope abraham reads ur posts mr.gilfoid, cos if he does i’m sure it will only drive him on even further and make an even bigger mess of your ‘PROSPECT’, and i say this cos so far he aint shown himself to be world class at all.