Abraham vs. Dirrell: Andre won’t let Arthur get his shots off
By Scott Gilfoid: When you’re dealing with a fighter who has almost no hand speed or ability to move around the ring the last thing you want to do is make it easy on them by just standing in front of them to let them punch. This is why Andre Dirrell (18-1, 13 KO’s), an extraordinary boxer, won’t be making it easy on former International Boxing Federation middleweight champion Arthur Abraham (31-0, 25 KO’s) in their March 27th fight at the Joe Louis Arena, in Detroit, Michigan. Abraham, 30, obviously would like nothing better than for Dirrell to stand and trade shots with him at close range.
We’re not talking about running here. Let’s be straight about this. Dirrell will not be running from Abraham, just as Dirrell wasn’t running against WBC super middleweight Carl Froch in their stage 1 Super Six tournament fight on October 17th in Froch’s home city of Nottingham, England. Froch fans, who may not be used to seeing an American with movement like Sugar Ray Robinson and Muhammad Ali moving around the ring, but that wasn’t running.
It’s called boxing. Some of the fighters from Europe are going to have to get used to it and get up to speed in the 21st century. The sport has evolved in the past 40 years and Dirrell is what we call a modern fighter. Abraham is going to have to learn on the job on March 27th or else he’s going to get royally spanked by Dirrell for 12 one-sided rounds.
The problem for Abraham is that he’s going to have major problems trying to get his shots off. Abraham has been used to having his mostly European opposition stand directly in front of him, making it easy for him to find them with his slow punches. He fights like a mummy. Seriously, it’s like fighting a big bear and then making it easy for it to maul and claw you by just standing in front of it.
Every time I see one of Abraham’s fights in the past where his clueless opposition just stood in front of him, I want to scream and shake some sense into his opponents. None of them fought him correctly, not one, and that includes American Jermain Taylor. They all blew it by being there for Abraham and made it easy for him not to have to plod around the ring to find them.
Believe me, Abraham won’t be able to land his slow punches against Dirrell, because he isn’t going to be fighting him in a small box. Dirrell is going to use the entire ring and make Abraham use his short legs to find him. This is going to be a major mismatch for Dirrell, you can’t count on that.
please use above banner to link back to us!
Scott, why do you hate European fighters so much? You bash the Klitschkos, Calzaghe, Kessler, Abraham – every single good European fighter.
Please explain why sometime, will you?
Scott Gilfoid you only write about Dirrell… Plus you have a biased opinion.
Sorry, dozed off after reading that article!
Please, I cant believe you would even right this scott. Direll has great speed, but cmon why in the world would u put him in the same categorie as the legends? Arthur is good, thats why hes undefeated, plus he fought with a broken jaw and still won, i see a 6th round KO victory Arthur Abraham.
King Arthur is an undefeated warrior.
Dirrell runs, holds and throws punches while backing up.
Gilfoid writes the same article over and over.
Predictions – AA wins by KO and Gilfoid writes another bad article making excuses for his Mandingo fantasy.
Carl gave a nice lesson to Dirrel
Abraham will distroy Dirrell’s brain.
scott gliford will keep writing articles..
you’re telling us to get up to speed with the 21st century and dirrell is a modern day boxer, yet you’re comparing him to robinson and ali!
we’ve still goit another two weeks of the same article to come. ‘Is Dirrell too fast for Arthur?’ etc etc. He might actually win but FFS get a life. I’m looking forward to the next ‘Scott’ (c*nt) article about a Brit boxer…..I reckon it’ll be kel Brook on Monday…..(Is Kel overrated?)…
You sound like a broken record. Find something else to write stupidity about.
Dirrell has done nothing and your comparing him to the 2 greatest boxers of all times that just shows all of the crack you have been smoking.
“It’s not running, thats what we call boxing.”
Sort your life out, there’s a difference between good movement and running.And again handspeed is nothing without timing and Abraham might not have the speed advantage but if he works the body early in the fight with his power then dirrell might just lose.
Footwork like Sugar Ray Robinson or Muhamed Ali, Scott are you high?
Dirrell has excellent movement and speed, of that I’m sure, and he could probably beat Abraham. Let’s not over-rate Dirrell, he’s good, but there’s no way he derserves to be mentioned in the same article as those legends.
I won’t be watching this fight as I am resolved never to watch Dirrell again. I would not even watch him giving me one million pounds.
I hope AA caves Dirrell’s head in.
i hope abraham reads ur posts mr.gilfoid, cos if he does i’m sure it will only drive him on even further and make an even bigger mess of your ‘PROSPECT’, and i say this cos so far he aint shown himself to be world class at all.
Kevin Mitchell against Breidis Prescott – was that running or boxing scott?
David Haye against Nikolae Valuev – was that running or boxing?