Comments on: McGuigan: “He [Pacquiao] is a victim of his own success” – News

By: ray gordonreid

ray gordonreid — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:34:42 +0000

victim ha

By: cali

cali — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:24:29 +0000

i love tyhis article.. you know besides the horrible ko on hatton, manny did mostly out work his opponents.. if you dont think hitting people from their blindside is not wearing opponents out, or if those blidside shots dont hurt, let someone hit u blind folded with a pillow. you will have new respect.

By: Manolito

Manolito — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:47:47 +0000

Mayweather really don’t have the guts to fight Pacquiao.
He, in cahoots with his deranged father just wanted to
create a stir and paint Pacquiao dirty hoping against
hope they can catch the interest of the public thereby
making an excuse why his ward Hatton got KO’d. They know
pretty well that this might end up in a lawsuit, but they
are no strangers to lawsuit. Floyd Jr., for one got 4 open
lawsuits at this point in Clark County. Since year 2001
up to September 2009, he had a total of 13 lawsuits star-
from negligence, to gross misconduct to breach of contract. So how would you deal/sign a contract with a
person with that character. Its inutile.

By: Boxing Fan

Boxing Fan — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 14:01:48 +0000

Boxing fans check out this interesting interview on Mayweather http://www.zshare.net/audio/676796581a1c2a9e/
Floyd and Pac fans this will provide you some enlightenment to cease these non sense arguments.

By: LabDoc

LabDoc — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:46:37 +0000

I love it: Pacman standing his ground, like he does in the ring. Mayweather on the other hand, he’s doing his shoulder roll even outside the ring. Running around and looking for cheap shots. His style of boxing reflects his character. This time, he is plainly afraid to lose. If this fight happens, Manny will pour out his madness on him on the very first round. I can see Manny wanting to knock him out in the very first punch. Watch out Floyd. You don’t want Pacman get mad.

By: Philly Lou

Philly Lou — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:36:52 +0000

Dont worry people. This fight will go on. All of this so called shenanigans is to create buzz and sell lots of tickets. It’s all about promotion!!

By: ty

ty — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:18:05 +0000

right on Barry.

By: aloha

aloha — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:14:54 +0000

James…If you’re fighting at Nevada (they the governing bodies who gave you license to fight there) and told you something and the same time the Mayweather team tell a different thing. Who do you thnk you’ll follow? The dictate from Mayweather or The one who gave license to fight the NSAC? That’s commonsense if you have one.

By: ste

ste — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:56:41 +0000

why should pacquiao dance to mayweather’s tune? Mayweather is the smaller name & is trying to play games like he always does. floyd knows the pacc man could beat him & is clearly running scared. if this fight dont happen then old money maker mayweather will only be rememberd for not fighting pacquiao. pacc man has destroyed people that mayweather has beat in better style n floyd is scared . period.

By: guest

guest — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:52:12 +0000

spin your heads, people, spin your heads!

keep your focus on the needle! and never let it go from your sight.

and you’ll never see the truth that you don’t need any needle at all to do this figtht!!!! as a matter of fact, you don’t need any needle to do any fight in nevada or the rest of america!!

while your distracted by the needle and your mind confused, i’ll slip my way out behind.

never stop spinning those heads

AND I’LL SEE YA IN MY NEXT FIGHT WITH A NEW GUY!
__________________________________________________________
if i’m really idealistic and believe that my sport, after so many decades, needs a NEW METHOD OF TESTING, should i just demand it later on a lower paying bout and just take this $40m paycheck fight???
or
if the NEW METHOD OF TESTING that i want is preventing me from getting into that $40m paycheck fight, should i just let go of that NEW METHOD OF TESTING,take the fight, collect my $40m, and just demand that NEW METHOD OF TESTING on my next, low paying bout???

…UNLESS…

UNLESS I REALLY DON’T WANT THAT $40 MILLION FIGHT!!!

now, if i really don’t want that $40m fight, how can i spin everybody’s head so that it would not look like i’m ducking the fight???

By: guest

guest — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:26:16 +0000

spin your heads, people, spin your heads!

keep your focus on the needle while the ‘fight of the century’ slips away from your sight!

spin that head and continue to be confused and distracted.

spin those heads all the rest of your miserable lives

By: guest

guest — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:22:50 +0000

now they asked ‘what happened to the fight?’

i spinned their heads so fast they didn’t even realize there wasn’t really any fight at all!

i ride along with what the public wants and took them for a ride myself.

By: guest

guest — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:22:14 +0000

if i am a fighter and i’m offered $40million paycheck in just one night of battle, why would i make things hard for the fight to take place?????

why would i demand a NEW WAY OF TESTING in a $40m paycheck fight, something that i’ve never done before on all of my previous fights, even to those where i only earned a million $ or less ??

if i’m really idealistic and believe that my sport, after so many decades, needs a NEW METHOD OF TESTING, should i just demand it later on a lower paying bout and just take this $40m paycheck fight??
or
if the NEW METHOD OF TESTING that i want is preventing me from getting into that $40m paycheck fight, should i just let go of that NEW METHOD OF TESTING,take the fight, collect my $40m, and just demand that NEW METHOD OF TESTING on my next, low paying bout??

…UNLESS…

UNLESS I REALLY DON’T WANT THAT $40 MILLION FIGHT!

now, if i really don’t want that $40m fight, how can i spin everybody’s head so that it would not look like i’m ducking the fight?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:11:33 +0000

what I find most amusing is that to prove the allegations mayweather senior etc made, he’d have to prove that he’s not taking PED’s that wouldn’t show up under normal testing… Presumably by giving blood tests, and close enough to a fight that it’d catch things like HGH. So… Umm… Why is the debate happening?

By: 4080wrx

4080wrx — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:12:29 +0000

All this talk about accusing someone with no proof is non-sense. While we are at it let just give Olympic style drug testing to the New York Yankees, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Los Angeles Lakers while we are at it, since these teams have the most championships in their respective sports.

I just want to see the fight don’t care who wins or looses. I just want to see someone get knock out.