Observations on Khan-Salita and Prescott-Mitchell

khan3432By Scott Gilfoid: First let me start off by saying that the decision given to Kevin Mitchell (30-0, 22 KO’s) was one of the most undeserving that I’ve ever seen since I started following boxing many years ago. No way did I see Mitchell winning this fight, not with the running he did against the hard hitting Breidis Prescott (21-2, 18 KO’s). Man, I haven’t seen running like that since I watched David Haye fight Nikolay Valuev. Mitchell was literally running from Prescott for 12 rounds, especially from rounds nine through twelve.

The judges gave Mitchell the win by a 12 round decision by the scores of 118-111, 117-111 and 119-110. I personally had Prescott winning the fight nine rounds to three. But I can see how the judges might have been influenced because the British crowd were screaming their heads off for every punch that Mitchell. And, yeah, Mitchell was missing or having his punches blocked by Prescott. I readily admit that Prescott missed a lot of shots, but doesn’t matter.

Prescott was the one landing the much harder shots in every round, the one that was doing the pressuring and landing the cleaner punches all the way through it. All Mitchell did was pot shot and run laterally all fight long. He really stunk up the place with his running. The scores are absolutely ridiculous, but then again, I’m not surprised after watching the Andre Dirrell vs. Carl Froch bout in Nottingham.

Mitchell did nothing in the fight other than throw jabs until the 8th round. By that time, I had Mitchell well behind in the fight five rounds to zero. I do think Mitchell fought well enough to win rounds six through nine. He edged those rounds by a small margin. But from rounds ten to twelve, Mitchell got on his bike and basically ran for the final three rounds of the bout.

prescott44If Mitchell had fought hard and fought toe to toe with Prescott during those rounds, I think he would have won it just barely, but instead Mitchell ran like no tomorrow. Occasionally he’d throw a pot shot or two, but nothing beyond that. Most of his offense entailed him throwing jabs and looking to land an infrequent power shot. The running was horrible to watch. I really feel sorry for Prescott, because he clearly won this fight as far as I’m concerned.

The referee Dave Parris seemed to choose the exact moments when Prescott was getting his shots off to step in and warn him for things. On one occasion, Parris warned Prescott for punching Mitchell in the back. However, Prescott had no other choice because Mitchell turned around and exposed his back so that he wouldn’t get hit by Prescott.

The warning wasted valuable time just when Prescott was teeing off on Mitchell against the ropes. It reminded me of how a British referee stopped the action in the Ricky Hatton vs. Juan Lazcano fight to let Hatton get his shoelaces tied. At the time that the referee stopped the action, Hatton had just been staggered and was taking punishment. Great timing, eh?

The British crowd often cheered Mitchell’s misses and his punches that were being blocked. This might have had an effect on the judges. It had to, because Mitchell was getting hit hard in the fight and not making a fight of it. I couldn’t give him rounds when he was running all over creation trying to keep from getting hit by Prescott. At the same time, the British crowd would be stone cold silent whenever Prescott would be landing his shots. In pretty much every round, Prescott landed the better shots. Mitchell may have out-landed him in some of the rounds, but that’s only if you couldn’t his weak jabs. Prescott had the much harder jab and was regularly snapping the head back of Mitchell.

It’s really too bad that mostly British boxing fans will see this fight, because if the rest of the world saw it like they did the Dirrell-Froch fight, they would agree with me that Prescott won the fight. It wasn’t even close. Prescott dominated the bout.

I hope that Mitchell and his fans aren’t getting excited about him winning a title, because unless he’s going after a paper title like Amir Khan, I can’t see Mitchell capturing one. I don’t consider Mitchell a top 10 fighter in the lightweight division, honestly. My estimation of his talent will bear fruit in the future when Mitchell is steered into a fight with a good lightweight.

I don’t give Mitchell one chance in hell of beating champions Edwin Valero, Antonio DeMarco, Juan Manuel Marquez, Paulus Moses, Miguel Acosta or Michael Katsidis. Besides them, I see the following lightweights as being much better fighters than Mitchell: Joel Casamayor, Joan Guzman, Ali Funeka, Anthony Peterson, Miguel Vazquez, Yuri Romanov, David Diaz, and Urbano Antillon.

In other words, I see Mitchell as a 2nd tier fighter. I don’t count the victory over Prescott, because like I said, I saw Prescott winning the fight 9 rounds to 3. The good thing that will come out of this fight is that there will likely be an over reach on Mitchell’s management’s part, who after seeing this fight, will probably make the mistake by thinking Mitchell is good enough to beat a top fighter. If they put Mitchell in with a top 10 fighter, he’s going to be torn apart. Forget about putting in with a champion. Mitchell will be beaten by a good top 10 fighter, unless the poor shmuck ends up losing a questionable decision like Prescott did.

***

As for the Amir Khan vs. Dmitriy Salita fight, I’m not impressed with Khan’s win. The reason is I don’t consider Salita to be a top tier fighter. I’m really not sure why on earth the WBA pushed Salita to the number #1 spot given his record of almost all C and B level fighters. Salita didn’t have one good A class fighter on his record. Because of that, I didn’t consider him a real top 15 contender.

Obviously, Freddie Roach saw what I saw, hence he allowed Khan to defend the title and no vacate it. If this was Marcos Maidana in there instead of the slow as molasses Salita, I have no doubt that Khan would have vacated the fight instead of taking him on. Salita gave Khan a chance for an easy defense, and enabled him to keep the myth alive for a little while longer.

Salita went down from the first two shots he was hit with, collapsing on the canvas after getting hit with a 1-2 combination in the opening seconds of the fight. I couldn’t believe it, because he looked like a weak chinned amateur instead of a number #1 contender. I can’t get excited about Khan’s win over a fighter like that. I’m sorry. Salita was heard from the knockdown and seemed to be staggering a little after he got up.

Khan then bum rushed him and dropped him in the corner with a left to the jewels followed by a fight to the head that sent Salita down on his knees. While he was down, Khan teed off on him with two free shots, which he didn’t get warned about from the referee from what I saw. There should have been a five minute time period for Salita to recover from the punches while he was down like David Haye received after he was hit after falling down in his fight with Monte Barrett last year. After Salita got up, Khan finished him off with a left to the head that sent him into the ropes where the referee decided to stop the fight.

This win won’t excite Americans and suddenly make Khan a huge star in the U.S. The reason is Salita isn’t well known in the U.S. He may be an American, but he’s not well known outside of the East Coast, and even then, no one is saying he’s going to be a champion. America has a lot of light welterweights, and just because he’s an American doesn’t mean we’re familiar with him.

Khan basically beat a little known fighter with horrible hand speed. This wasn’t the powerful Maidana or the tough Lamont Peterson, Devon Alexander or Timothy Bradley. Salita was someone that really had no business fighting for a title, not when he hadn’t faced a 1st tier fighter before in his career. I see Khan still getting knocked out by Prescott if he ever fights him again. He won’t. The decision loss to Mitchell finishes any hope of Khan facing Prescott again in this lifetime. That’s too bad, because I think Prescott beat Mitchell, and I think he’d destroy Khan again if he fights him.

I sure don’t want to watch Mitchell fight Khan, and I hope Khan isn’t planning on dragging Mitchell to the U.S. to fight here. That fight won’t draw flies because no one knows who Mitchell is and the fight will basically stink with both fighters running around the ring for 12 rounds. I’m not impressed with Khan, but I do think he’s a top 15 fighter in the light welterweight division. I see Khan as being about the 15th beat light welterweight in the division. But Mitchell, I see him as 2nd tier all the way.

It will be really interesting to see who Khan is matched up against next. Although he’s mentioning Ricky Hatton a lot, but that’s not happening. Neither is a fight against Marquez. Since both of them won’t be available, I see Khan going after someone like Mitchell. Khan won’t t want to fight Maidana, and I can’t see Khan facing a tough light welterweight contender. Khan just finished facing a totally weak number #1 mandatory in Salita.

But Khan will probably take someone weak just the same. Watch, it will probably be Mitchell. What a crummy fight that will be. Khan might as well stay in England if that’s who he’ll be fighting. I still see Khan as a paper champion and someone who will never beat a real champion with any real talent. If he had been facing Prescott on Saturday night instead of the slow moving glass jawed Salita, Khan would have likely been taken out of the ring on a stretcher. Prescott would have destroyed him.


Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

93 Responses to “Observations on Khan-Salita and Prescott-Mitchell”

  • dumb yank says:

    I have to admit, us americans do whinge a lot because like a child we need to be told we’re the best or our egos feel hurt

  • don@london says:

    That’s because you’re stupid Travis and aint got a clue, if you turn your scores around then you’re being generous to Prescott. Now go and eat some peanut butter and jello sandwiches and leave the commenting to people who know a bit about the sport!

  • Travis says:

    Nice to see some real boxing insights on the web. This site seems to have the most sensible contributors. Again the British hype jobs were in process. The whole Mitchell/Prescott production was criminal. Mitchell ran the entire fight and landed nothing of note. The biased commentating on Sky was nothing short of comedy and the scorecards were also laugh out loud funny. There were 3-4 rounds where Mitchell hardly threw a punch yet he wins almost every round. Ridiculous. Even worse was the praising of Mitchell after the fight. Bottom line is Mitchell couldn’t be trusted (and after what I saw I guess rightfully so) to take down a mediocre brawler so they had to secure the scorecards from the off. BTW had it 8 rounds to 4 to Prescott.

  • M&M says:

    Salita didn’t have to fight Khan, he had to fight the 10,000 crowd who hated him because he is American

  • M&M says:

    What about rematch with Salita in New York

  • ryanb says:

    O dear O dear O dear Scott another poor call. What did i tell ya Mitchell will win on points it went exactly as i said it would and again the opposite of what you said. Keep going u might get 1 right 1 day

  • Andrew Evans says:

    Khan beat your American fighter without breaking into a sweat and he wasn’t home bred, you had to import him from the Ukraine. Now you turn on him, don’t you feel ashamed. King Khan is now going to The USA and he will clean up over there, just you wait and see.

  • DAZZA says:

    ha ha ha wot a bellend you havnt got clue ha ha

  • kman says:

    this author seems like a moron..just because his predictions are going wrong he is trying to berate the winners!!!

  • Anonymous says:

    hows the crow taste scott?. you must be used to it by now because you eat it after almost every boxing match!

  • mark says:

    IRISh

    id stop calling others names as your the f**Ktard that said calazaghe was the greatest super middleweight of all time!

    hahaha your a loser!

  • ash says:

    Not once in the whole article is there an indication that it is tongue in cheek, ironic, trying to get a rise, or remotely “clever”. Like someone said before it seems this is genuinely what he feels about the fights he watched. Over the next few years we will see the fighter kahn will become – fully convinced he has everything he needs to do all that he dreams of. We can all say now that Salita wasn’t up to much, and it means next to nothing. Was the Salita fight a good test for Khan? No. But then nobody’s saying that. He flattened the guy in a round, and that’s un understatement, he couldn’t have done better. There will be huge tests for Khan to come and I can’t wait to see how he rises to them. Quite simply he’s the kind of fighter people watch boxing for.

  • neb says:

    Scott is British believe it or not

  • adam w says:

    Not mentioning Dirrell running from Froch or was that just boxing on the back foot. Biased c**t

  • Martin says:

    What a plonker you are Gilfraud!

  • Ross says:

    HAHAHAHA Gilford is such a looser, the guy knows NOTHING about boxing, What a joker!! lolololololol

  • Carrick says:

    Same with Manuel Perez, all he does is write an article saying something about Manny Pacquiao that he doesn’t even mean, and you all bite and can’t wait to rub it in his face when Manny Pacquiao wins. All british fighters, Manny Pacquiao and recently Floyd Mayweather from Chris Williams, if you believe anything they say you are an idiot, can’t wait for the next article with 100 comments of biting

  • Carrick says:

    I dont think Scott is a joke, he is a genius! A bit of a sad genius but he is one. People read his articles and go WHATTTTTTT!!!! HOW CAN HE SAY THIS?????

    He does it because your all gullable and stupid enough to bite. The longer you keep on biting, the longer its going to be that Scott Gilfoid will write articles.

  • Rick says:

    Scott also said this:

    All Mitchell did was pot shot and run laterally all fight long. He really stunk up the place with his running. The scores are absolutely ridiculous, but then again, I’m not surprised after watching the Andre Dirrell vs. Carl Froch bout in Nottingham.

    Dirrell was the one running all night, stinking the place out but you said he your should have won that fight. So it’s OK for Dirrell to literally run away from from his opponent all night but not Mitchell?

    Again inconsistant Scott. You are a joke “writer”.

  • steve says:

    Napoleon time for your meds turn off the computer. Then go to bed or you will miss Waterloo tomorrow and the Brits will win again.

  • don@london says:

    It’s ok Scott you can have mine, it may be a bit big for you though!

  • MR Lee c says:

    SCOTT YOU R AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT AND I BET U GOT BULLIED BY A BRIT WHO KNEW MORE ABOUT BOXING THAN U WILL EVER KNOW YOU FANNY, GET A LIFE AND SOME BALLS AND WRITE THE TRUTH NOT A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS LIKE NORMAL. :-)

  • Colin Pearson says:

    “Obviously, Freddie Roach saw what I saw, hence he allowed Khan to defend the title and no vacate it.”

    Freddie Roach didn’t see what you saw, because what you saw from Salita from his earlier fights was that Khan would be “brutally knocked out”.

    Prescott has also been exposed as a very 1-dimensional fighter, if he doesn’t hit you with a wild haymaker you can easily out box him as he has no jab whatsoever.

  • Anonymous says:

    boxing is not your sport, write about something you know more about, perhaps ballet? or ping pong?

  • Alex C says:

    You said he’d be brutally knocked out and to mark your words. Your words were marked. In this article you’ve performed a complete volte-face. Face up to it, you were wrong. Please seek another job that doesn’t require boxing expertise. You are so wearisome

  • kev 121 says:

    yee haa !!! tears of a clown Gilfoid,hey maybe Mitchell should fight Dirrell,, 10/1, on never a punch being landed tee hee hee !!

  • Anonymous says:

    keep trying gilfoid you’ll get it right again one day like you did with ward ha ha law of averages.keep writing scotty we like a good laugh in the UK and you really are a big joke ha ha

  • Mark says:

    Given your previous column predicting both Khan and Mitchell would get KO’d, I’d think you’d be a little more contrite! Far from it! You are truly a paradigm of buffoonish audacity.

  • Anonymous says:

    You harp on about Mitchell running, when he landed many more punches than Dirrell did against Froch, yet you say Dirrell should have won by a mile. Hypocrite!

  • fishy says:

    humble pie for afters

  • fishy says:

    mitchell done great, sounds like you are jealous of british talent. enjoy your burger and fries, im sure its all you eat!

  • milosands says:

    It reminded me of Lacy v Calzaghe too – you could see from the off that MItchell was going to win and control the fight.

  • Mike. says:

    It reminded me of the Lacey/Galzaghe fight. Prescott thought he was going to punch his head off, but only found him with a couple of good shots. While Mitchel scored to both head and body consistently. You yanks love stats, that’s why I chuckled when it was revealed Mitchel landed DOUBLE the number of punches of Prescott. I’m not great with stats, but on the night, would that make him twice the fighter, or twice as effective? Please help. The playground bully got out-boxed AND out fought, Like Lacey, Prescott has been exposed by the better exponent of The Beautiful Art.

  • josh says:

    how many times to people have to tell you that haye messed up his hand would you go toe to toe with valuev if you where pratically fighter one handed

  • Scott Brutally Wrong says:

    another excellent article. Plz quit.

  • rdmantle says:

    Oh my word!

    I watched both these fights and I can say with absolute confidence that Mitchell beat Prescott comfortably.
    And Khan demolished Salita without breaking a sweat.

  • scotisafool says:

    hahaha.. wot a C.O.C.K u r scott

  • mickeymarley says:

    lol gotta love this site, wouldnt be the same without Gilface.

    You think every other boxing writer got this wrong? Only Gilfish got this one right lololololol

  • number 1's says:

    You are a fraud of a man Scott! I know you write all this ridicule up about British fighter’s because its a laugh and you get a kick out of it aswell. But you really dont have a notion of whats going on in the boxing world. You dont understand the art of boxing and the shady going on in it. All I can say is that Freddie Roach has unleashed a beast of a boxer in Khan , his pace is so frightening , his feints , his head movement. Im very impressed with him at the minute. His next fight is going to be very interesting!!

  • Scott Gilfoid says:

    HaHaHa!!
    Gotcha everyone.I only write this crap to draw attention to myself.I just love all the abuse you give me,keep it coming suckas!!

  • simon19287 says:

    If Khan fights Madfinia i could see him winning a wide UD , WITH FREDDIE ROACH BY HIS SIDE , hes unbeatble

  • fightfan says:

    Scotman you sound like a retard. Great results for Mitchell and Khan, once again proving how little the author knows, and how much he’s simply a wind-up merchant.

  • don@london says:

    I think you two got your wires crossed somewhere fella’s! You were both saying the same thing!

  • David Owen says:

    yeah i did because you came from nowhere i’m speaking to the author not you

  • don@london says:

    Sorry mate i didn’t see that!

  • Dodswm says:

    You might want to get those eyes checked Gilfraud… Prescott was in the black trunks btw, as you seem to have got
    confused.

  • don@london says:

    Scotman, David Owen wasn’t talking about you mate he was talking about Scott Gilfoid (the author).

  • David Owen says:

    Scotman why dont you go and take a running jump off the nearest tall structure and die Prescott didn’t win the fight didn’t get the result off the judges HE LOST THE FIGHT Mitchell shown how to beat him

  • don@london says:

    The game is up Scott, everyone knows what you’re all about now and you’re washed up, finished, kaput!!!

  • Dan says:

    What a burk…
    Typical yank, has no idea

  • the REAL deal says:

    how do you still have a job?

  • Andrew Evans says:

    Scott I really feel sorry for you because there are a lot of very talented British boxers coming through. I have an idea though, when Haye and Khan go over to the States if they became US citizens you could then support them and would no longer have to cry in your beer.

  • David Owen says:

    You should not be allowed to write articles for this site Scott you are a pathetic person you had Prescott winning the fight 9 rounds to 3 shut up Mitchell won the fight no question i really hate you Scott i hope you die a very painful death

  • weslad says:

    abit unfair dont you think ,as mayweathers made a career out of running round the ring away from his opponents,

  • steve says:

    complete tosser !!!

  • Deano says:

    The sports called boxing …Not rockying!! Mitchell out boxed him. Not every bout has to be a toe to toe rocky style slug fest to be a cracking fight. Scotty it seems to me you write your reviews just to be objective for the sake of being objective.

  • Jim Bom says:

    Someone call an ambulance and take this guy to a mental institution: Department delusions

  • West says:

    Mitchell completely outboxed Prescott- he hit his opponent without being hit himself- that’s boxing numnuts! As for Khan he made scot look like a clown with his prediction that Salita would knock him out

  • Mike says:

    Get a life scott you said both of them would be brutally koed. Stop talking out of your backside for a change. Mitchell deserved that victory and its only cause you hate europeans that you think otherwise. If i recall you said khan would get destroyed and know that you are wrong and can’t make excuses about salita being robbed you say he was a knowbody.

  • BlakeyBoyBoxing says:

    By the way this is the last time i leave a comment on one of this numpties articles and if everyone wants to get rid of Scott they should do the same.

  • Davey says:

    lol oh dear , you say Mitchell ran?? giveover your being a hypocrite!, Mitchell skillfully and diversly outboxed Prescott on the back foot and caught Pressott with some lovely lefts, if he barely touched Prescott and ran and hugged him all night like your boy Dirrell did you would have an agrument but unfortunately you forever have your US blinkers on your just an H O R S E

  • BlakeyBoyBoxing says:

    Mitchell totally dominated from start to finish, if you thought Prescott won you truly know nothing about boxing, you absolute t w a t. As for Khan he was devastating. Remember Scott you were bigging up Salita before the fight and saying how he’d knock Khan out and now you say how bad he is, which one is it. 2 more predictions wrong, ha you totall bell end.

  • ALAN BOSWORTH says:

    spot on JOE NEALE.

  • matthew says:

    haha, you say mitchell just ran, and so shouldn’t have been given the decision, but then talk about the froch v direll decision with a sense of injustice! for every yard mitchell ran direll ran a MILE!

  • Iska says:

    What? Another manuel perez-liam santiago clone? Gimme a break,bitte!

  • Rude Bwoi says:

    Oh Dear What a complete idiot.

    I read the first few sentences and that was enough for me.

  • Joe Neale says:

    If every one hates Scott Gilfoid why are you reading and posting on his articles lmao

  • jluck says:

    aaaahhhh i hate this mug! Im starting to get fed up with bn24 because of this numpty writing such bias articles on here every day! He cleary has a problem with the british and is gonna drive people away from this great site! I reckon his old dear must of been shaggin the milk man who happend to be english and it has ruined his life and the only way to get it out of his system is writng crap online! I bet he weighs 60st lives at home with hes cheating mum and aint never left usa!

  • Uzzy says:

    This writer is the biggest joke ever. Sailta will “destroy Khan, mark my words”, that’s what you said right? Did that happen? I’m not sure it did.

    Gilfoid knows nothing about boxing, if Mitchell-Khan was to happen, it will happen in London, there’s been no talk ever of taking it to the USA.

    Also, Khan doesn’t run, he’s an attacking boxer.

  • 5565 says:

    scott, more sh.t comes out of ur mouth than ur as.s

  • Rob says:

    I’m not a fan of running boxers, I didn’t like ali, I don’t like floyd and I certainly don’t like dirrell but come on… Mitchell clearly won this one, It wasn’t close and not open for debate at all! And then Khan… I don’t like him either (really there are a lot of boxers I do like) but he destroyed Salita beyond belief. If you wan’t to write about a questionable decision look at the Paul Williams fight… The 2 BRITS -because that’s what it’s all about for you, those $%^# Brits- clearly won!

  • G says:

    what fight where you watchin? Mitchell nearly took prescotts head off a couple of times, completly outboxed & out thought a lumbering prescott, and you were wrong again about Kahn, hahahahahahahaha. its good you get paid for this garbage, who ever pays you is an idiot

  • KAM says:

    RESPECT TO KHAN AND MITCHELL, AMERICANS NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE BRITISH FIGHTERS ARE HERE TO STAY. AND ALL U KHAN HATERS SHAME ON YOUR NAME THE KID IS FOR REAL.

  • Peter(Hitman Fan) says:

    What about when Dirrell was running from Froch, how could he get a decision.

  • Sam says:

    Wrong again Scott

  • craig says:

    u were the one saying how salita would beat khan how can you go back on what you said you fool. keving mitchel completely out boxed prescott what fight did you watch

  • Ste Wood says:

    btw – I still don’t think MITCHELL ran as much as dirrell!

  • derrick says:

    Theres opinion then there is just poor misinformed knowledge, inept literacy skills, observation skills, boxing knowledge and common sense. Mitchell clearly won with lateral movement and slick counter punching. To add the kids flashy! You can have the wordls hardest punch but if you cant land it , then its useless. Anybody can make mistakes. You will be more respected as a writer if you; analyse your own judgements, the fight and admit you was wrong.

  • London says:

    Who on earth is this guy writing this article, I did not waste my time reading it, I only read the first paragraph and was enough…talk about Mr negative. im outa here. Well Done Amir. First comment he made on Air when he stepped out the ring “First of all I’d like to thank God…” what a true Man!

  • Ste Wood says:

    lads we have it ALL wrong its not that Khan and Mitchell won its that a biased home decision has robbed the other 2 fighters?! Just like the Haye fight Mitchell had a duty to stand perfectly still and let Prescott demonstrate his amazing power to hit him in the head!

    btw – I still don’t think Dirrell ran as much as dirrell!

  • Ukansodoff says:

    Theres only one Scott Gilfoid
    Theres only one Scott Gilfoid
    Walkin along
    Singin a song
    Walking in a Gilfoid BLUNDER land.

  • SHINKWIN says:

    The art of boxing is to hit and not be hit….. and surely the man who lands the most punches is the one whose hand should be raised! Exactly what Mitchell done!

    Maybe try reporting tennis or golf in future Scott as it seems over the years you’ve been following boxing you must have been too focused on the ring girls!

  • milosands says:

    The fact that you take time to write such a lengthy article says a lot about the void you have to fill. The fact that you put so much effort into it also says that this site is all you have. Therefore I feel sorry for you.

    For you to say what you have about Kevin Mitchell is just daft. You did see the punches landed right? Mitchell about 100 landed and Prescott about 50 landed. But you still have Prescott winning yeah?

    So you want Mitchell to stand and trade but Dirrell is allowed to run? The thing is I actually thought Froch was extremely lucky but MItchell took Prescott apart and won easy. Anyone can see that.

    Your funny.

  • Mark says:

    When will people give khan the credit he derserves. He inhilated slaita last night, and now he deserves a shot at the next best, whoever that may be. I definately feel that give him another year, maybe 2 years. He will be ready for a floyd mayweather and under the guidance of freddie roach, he will be a great champ. People are saying salita is a bum and salita is this and that. Well how many top fighters have pacquaio and mayweather fought when they first defended their belts. Not every fighter faces number 1 opposition in title defences. So for once give khan the credit he deserves.

  • wellsini says:

    Come on now Mitchell destroyed Prescott

  • Mark says:

    What the author doesnt take into account in his biased lob-sided article, is Khan is still only 22. He has plenty of time to take on these “1st tier fighters” and I feel he has the mechanics and stewardship to show the world what he can do.

    Im looking forward to reading Mr Gilfoids articles on Khans forthcoming fights with great interest.

  • MattUK says:

    Haha – pathetic from Gilfoid yet again. Americans don’t get sarcasm Steve, I’m confident this is how this moron genuinely feels about the fight. Absolute joke.

  • jamie says:

    what a bellend…

  • andre says:

    mr gilfoid! You are the one who claimed khan would be brutally knocked out by salita and prescott would knock mitchell! You are wrong yet again

  • Steve T says:

    Perfect amount of sarcasm yet again. You’re the only reason to read this site hands down. Keep it up!

  • Duffy says:

    give up t w a t

  • FLETCH says:

    wrong again scot you Knob!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!