Comments on: Breidis Prescott will destroy Kevin Mitchell on Saturday

By: gilfoid talks crap

gilfoid talks crap — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:28:29 +0000

HAHA eat your words gilfoid you have shown yourself to be a joke yet again

well done mitchell lad

By: kyle

kyle — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:35:46 +0000

go scotty boy your analysis was bang on. i think you owe mitchel an apology for being a total numpty who clearly knows nothing about the sport the lad is accelerating his popularity in.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:47:34 +0000

Haha how wrong you are! Awful journalism if you can call it that

By: Mikeonthemoon

Mikeonthemoon — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:51:01 +0000

“What’s more likely to take place is Mitchell being totally destroyed and humiliated in front of a large British audience.”

The painful truth – and I’m a true Brit and a bit of a Mitchell fan.

Good article.

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:12:55 +0000

Why do we have this in the world? Why do people quite clearly hate other nations? It’s pathetic. Scott, it’s about time you grew up, your grammar is pretty good, but I just can’t imagine you being an adult. People like you make me ashamed to be a human. You disgust me.

By: Martin

Martin — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:22:57 +0000

The outcome of this fight will depend on the quality of Mitchell’s defence. If Mitchell keeps it tight, makes Prescott miss with his sweeping shots and counter punches with authority I believe that he will win on points or by late stoppage.

If Mitchell get’s wreckless in the early rounds then I see Prescott winning.

Needless to say Brit fighter = Gilfraud prediction they will lose – surprise, surprise.

By: bob james

bob james — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:30:23 +0000

there are questions to be answered with mitchell stepping up in weight, but ability wise he is streets ahead of prescott. you have obviously not seen mitchell fight very much have you?

By: trigger

trigger — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:55:07 +0000

scot ur a WANKER!

By: David Owen

David Owen — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:55:26 +0000

I’m fed to the back teeth of you Scott

By: Ste Wood

Ste Wood — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:20:03 +0000

Another silly article… so not a bit of respect to Kevin for taking up the challenge then?

By: belowthebelt

belowthebelt — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:08:34 +0000

Interesting … is this another ‘bash the brits’ rant or is Scotty boy actually saying something ?

Uhmn, now I do think that Mitchel is a little jumped up at times, but he is a genuine talent, no doubt. I do agree, however, that this really is a dangerous dive into the deep blue, and not only because of coming up in weight. On the contrary to Scotty, I think the move up in weight will benefit Mitchel somewhat, making hiom a touch faster than Bredis ( very important if Mitchel is to get inside and make his shots count agauinst Bredis.
Bredis can be wobbled and is no ‘iron man’ … yes, he is a lethal puncher, but I am sure that Mitchell’s people were fully aware of this fact before they took the fact – this, in turn, means that they have put together what they believe are the effective game plans to beat the guy.

I think if Mitchell can control his agrresive style and has the ability to take the odd shot here and there, he will win this … possibly by stopping Bredis and making a real announcment about his arrival in the division. However, to stop Bredis, he needs to respect the fact that bredis is constantly dangerous as long as he is on his feet !

By: frad

frad — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:57:46 +0000

mitchell will win, he’s a slugger yes but can box very well also. Scott it was a well written article but i think you over estimate prescott.I cant see him winning on points and i can see him getting outworked by mitchell. Mitchell has not looked good of late but he has all the skills he needs to beat prescott.

By: aj

aj — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:37:01 +0000

i dont really rate mitchell but thefact scott has backed prescott i would bet my house on mitchell because lets face it when was the lasttime scott got a prediction right??????????????? froch v dirrell, haye v valuel, pac v cotto all wrong need i continue?

By: dean m

dean m — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:30:39 +0000

mitchell has took a risk by taking this fight but then who else at this weight that is british would? exactly wat i thought no one to many boxers including khan especially are being brought through the ranks wit a silver spoon. they need to fight real ppl an that is exactly wat mitchell done a few fights back against johannson even tho i dont see carl at prescotts level he is still a banger an a good well schooled fighter. after two rounds if it does go that far my money would be on mitchell prescotts big wild swings i can see being avoided by mitchell an he will then take full advantage of the open chin that prescott provides this will be a war not a first or second round knockout mitchell has a chin unlike tinchin khan cant wait for the fight going to be a cracker

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:07:04 +0000

gemser if hes such a banger y e lose last time out. bangers dont always ko their opponents, u know nothing