Time to change the record – Froch ‘BEAT’ Dirrell

froch4534By Liam Santiago: I am sick and tired of hearing people saying Andre Dirrell beat Carl Froch. It is really starting to boil my kettle. Recently Dirrell’s trainer or advisor or whatever has claimed Froch was beaten. Amir Khan has also stated his thoughts on a ‘hometown decision’. Bo**ocks! Froch beat him clearly. On my card is was by two rounds. Dirrell came on strong in the late rounds, but that is not enough.

I am also sick and tired of fighters who take a beating throughout the whole bout, then win the last two rounds and claim they have won. That is what Dirrell did. Froch bossed him through the fight, Dirrell came on very strong in the last two rounds, so he thinks he has won. The same thing happened with Paul Smith vs Tony Quigley. Quigley totally dominated Smith. However, Smith won the last two very convincingly and the judges gave it to him.

The commentary from John Rawling did not help the critics. It was damn ridiculous. He stated Froch was getting out boxed and missing with everything. At the start of round 8 I muted my television and watched the fight in peace. Anyhow, Dirrell was beaten. Simple. Froch won. It is now time for all the bitter Froch hater’s to change the record and look forward to Froch vs Kessler and Dirrell vs Abraham.


Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

20 Responses to “Time to change the record – Froch ‘BEAT’ Dirrell”

  • D.Solis says:

    All the people that said froch won are mostly from england and don’t want to admit that froch lost because they have too much pride.They need to bow up and admit that froch got very lucky that he foght in his backyard.Instead of having too much pride and admitting dirrell won the fight they should be ashamed that their beloved froch got schooled the way he did.I don’t understand how they could still have faith and stand by their talentless fighter after he showed that how ameteur he looked that night.I would be ashamed tocall myself an english boxing fan

  • ROOTS says:

    J-LANDER I DON´T HAVE TO GET IN THE RING WITH CROCH, FIGHTING IS WHAT HE GETS PAID TO DO. HE IS NOT THAT GOOD AT THAT. BUT I WOULD MEET YOU IN THE STREET ANY TIME,AND I CAN PROMISE YOU IT WOULD BE BRUTAL.

  • Anonymous says:

    Good article agree with opinion of both fights! Can you please teach Scott Gilfoid how to write a decent article!!!!!!!!!

  • Peter(Hitman Fan) says:

    Liam thank god you said something to make everyone appy except the americans keep up these kind of articles.

  • j lander says:

    love to see you in the ring with froch roots,now that would be a laugh haha

  • ROOTS says:

    FROCH KNOWS HE LOST, THAT WAS EVEN WIDER THAN VALUEV´S LOST TO HAYE.FROCH IS THE MOST INEPT OF THESE SO-CALLED WORLD CHAMPIONS,BOTH HIS POWER AND TOUGHNESS IS OVERATED.TAYLOR,A COMPLETE NON-PUNCHER,HAD HIM DOWN AND HURT IN THEIR FIGHT,SO HOW THE HELL CAN HE BE SO TOUGH.HE WAS THE ONLY MAN TAYLOR KNOCK DOWN IN OVER 6 YEARS

  • liam the nutmole says:

    i only suspected you were a complete idiot until i read this article. Now i know. This shows me just the kind of “expert” you really are. You judgement is horrible and you are a biased moron. You must be froch’s girlfriend or something because there is no way in hell froch won. I was rooting for froch and became a dirrell fan by the end of the fight. Hes a middleweight mayweather with a bit more power and a bit more balls

  • samo says:

    kettling my head, is the expresion I have grew to love.

  • Anonymous says:

    Froch got beat and the world knows it I can tell you one thing Kessler is going to know him out

  • karma says:

    liam stop writing!! why are you still writing!! negative credebility!

  • FLETCH says:

    take my cmment of you yanky c.u.n.t dont like the truth

  • Rocky says:

    Your kettle always seem to be boiling…

  • owenspud says:

    Dirrell was too careful-if they fought again now,I have no doubts that Dirrell would won comfortably.Froch is like Bambi on ice!

  • Anonymous says:

    Who give a Sh*t about your card Liam.

  • Mark Fletcher says:

    Froch won but i disagree Liam as you say Dirrell came on strong late, I thought that Froch got stronger although Dirrell would have won round ten had he not held

  • Andrew Evans says:

    I completely agree after all the judges decision is final. Dirrel held and was very negative. There is no way a European judge would favour another European, they have all fought wars against each other.

  • kev 121 says:

    Nope actually europe’s in the lead 2-1.Ward pulling off a great win to finally make this a contest.No use kessler complaining about hitting on the break or excessive holding this is proffessional boxing at the highest level and he shudda responded accordingly.froch did, when dirrel held on like a girl, froch threw him off like a man and when dirrel tried to hide his chin behind froch’s shoulder, froch hit him anyway,finally realising he had to fight he did ok, but too little too late. how many challenges over the years have sat in the dressing room still full of beans wishing they’d done more

  • Johnson says:

    FROCH WON – DIRRELL = RUNAWAY P*SSY Y*NK. GET OVER IT LOSERS!

    HAHAHAHA 2-1 EUROPE, NO AMERICAN WILL WIN THIS COMP! ENJOY EATING HUMBLE PIE OR PECAN PIE AS IT IS OVER THERE!

  • danny b says:

    listen m8t give up wee the writing u speek pish

  • Jason says:

    DIRRELL CLEARLY BEAT FROCH…FROCH NOW WAY IN HELL WON DAT FIGHT..AMERICA IS IN THE LEAD 2-1

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!