Boxing: a spent force? Or can we bring the romance back?

ward4434by Daniel Ciminera: In my mind, boxing as lost a lot of it’s excitement and romance of late. The event that prompted this article is that of the Khan v Salita undercard. Firstly, the fighters on the undercard are at a disadvantage as Khan is not a big-name fighter yet, and what’s more, not many people like him. I’d bet that more people will buy the fight in order to see if he will get knocked out, than to cheer him on. The worst part is that most of the fighters are Britain’s new wave of talent, the Olympic lads. How on earth are these guys fighting on pay per view already? They don’t have a fan-base yet, and can’t expect to build one if we cant watch them fight regularly on free TV.

In my opinion, pay per view boxing is harming the sport a great deal. For starters, in the past decade especially, boxing as a sport has declined in popularity and integrity. While I don’t claim it didn’t used to be, it’s full of corruption, and has fallen to “crony” culture. Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Louis, Marciano, La Motta, Dempsey, Farr, Cooper. Some well known names in boxing, even most young children could identify at least 5 of them. They weren’t hyped up, they weren’t used to make “super-fights” to draw pay per view audiences. They didn’t need to, they were Titans, Warriors, Pugilistic artists who were literally Gods-amongst-men. If they were fighting, everyone was watching. Even more recently than those, we’ve had the likes of Hagler, numerous “Sugar” Rays, Tyson, Holyfield, Eubank, Benn, Jones Jr, Hopkins. Who do we have now? David Haye? Vitali Klitchko? You’d forgive most kids for asking “who?” When did this culture of over-hyped pay per view boxing begin? Was it when Don King threw Tyson to the lions for his own gain? possibly.

Boxing used to be about honour and pride. It still is the most disciplined, and beautiful sport in my opinion. I fear the corporate machine and political nonsense has taken the sport I so dearly love away from me. It used to be about the two athletes in the ring battling to prove who was the best. Now, it is more about who can make the most money from fighting “safe” opponents. The media, as I mentioned before aren’t entirely without blame. There has become a trend of saying a boxer is useless, out of his depth, or finished just because they have lost one fight. If boxers didn’t have this kind media execution to contend with, they may take on riskier fights, they may not “need” to keep the perfect record.

All you hear nowadays is “pound for pound”, I don’t want to see these cross-division fights, the pound for pound best is for speculation, it was part of the romance of the sport. What if? Who would win between…? Stop ruining it for us and make some fights we want to see, promote more fighters, help new ones come through. Build boxing back to what it once was before mixed martial arts takes over completely.

If boxing wants to fend off the likes of the UFC, it needs to evolve fast, it needs to centralize, with clear rankings, and it needs to be promoted better with a simple website, like you have with the NFL, and NBA, etc. A clear layout of who is who, what they are doing, what’s coming up, what has been. We need regular boxing on free to air tv, we need local fighters being promoted, building regional rivalries amongst fighters and fans. I don’t see the need for pay per view if the media helps build boxing back up among the fans, they will get the ratings and figures they’ve become accustomed to.

I had hoped the global recession would have a positive affect on this relentless, fight-anybody kind of boxing. Kind of like Nigel Benn. Not really for the purist, but by god he was exciting to watch. Where are these fighters? Are they cast aside by the media after losing a fight? They may well be working through the ranks as we speak, but they aren’t being promoted by the sport. It is that type of fearless fighter who people will get behind and follow their every move.

Aside from the promotion of more fighters, we need more imagination from the sport. There are signs that it is going to change, but not enough. The Super Six World Boxing Classic is a shining example of what can be done when greed and fear is put to one side for a moment. Four of the six were unbeaten going into the tournament, Kessler’s only loss to the unbeaten great, Calzaghe. Hardly a blemish for most. These are the types of fighters which boxing is so lacking in at the moment. Some of them are going to lose their unbeaten records. Dirrell already has, and Kessler has suffered the second loss of his career. But. People are talking, people are watching and for the first time in a long time, people are EXCITED.


Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

19 Responses to “Boxing: a spent force? Or can we bring the romance back?”

  • Andrew Evans says:

    I agree boxing needs an overhaul, there are too many belts and which one is the real world champion. I think PPV is ruining it. I watched Amir Khan through his amateur career up until now and I have enjoyed all his televised fights but there is no way I am paying to view. I am a keen F1 fan as well but they seem to manage without PPV how come?

  • hasbeen says:

    Boxing used to be a sport where the champs of each prospective division wanted to face each other and prove that they were the best. Title Unification bouts were the back bone of the sport. These were the fights that people would be talking about at work on monday morning. These were the fights that gave birth to more than a few of the great trilogies that people still talk about. Sadly Title Unification bouts are all most a thing of the past. These great fights that used to take place two,three or maybe four times a year have now been replaced by the so called super fights. Rather that provide the viewing public with bouts where the best are facing the best through out the year the promoters are perfectly happy to make a killing giving us one or two of their super fights a year. They point to the money generated and say that boxing in alive and well. Boxing is doing so well in the states that I have to go a tobacco store news stand to buy a ring magazine. I guess as long as the promoters pockets are full the sport is doing just fine.

  • testicularfortitude says:

    cull readership by appealing to base and puerile human motivations…

  • testicularfortitude says:

    Agreed, boxing needs major overhall and it must capitalize on the success and rise of a most compelling phenom in pacman who will soon retire. Boxing has an air of legitimacy and history world wide lacking in other combat sport and as such compelling stats and figures for endless debates and speculation.

  • testicularfortitude says:

    @GH, well, you are right, I ‘ve been blocked so many times, and only the serious article and response…they may allow this one to go through

  • zee zee says:

    boxing is a spent force.

    boxing can come back if boxing was on on bbc / itv

    the heavyweights are dead, plus you have to pay to see boxing now. that sucks.

  • wayner says:

    its true boxing has lost its luster i remember the good ol days of some sock em rock em robot action!! watch barrera morrales 1!!! where people really hated each other and left it all out in the ring now we see bad matchups bad decisions people waiting on a ton of money!!? and willingb to take a risk. with an challenger.. rated or not all these weight catches etc.. and ducking..opponents.. bring back chavez, tyson,holyfeild, hagler,delahoya,trinidad barrera,morales.marquez brothers, stevie johnson.tua,etc

  • Al francis says:

    i would have to disagree with this, dont get me wrong, boxing doesnt carry anywhere near the prestige that it used to, but by all accounts we’re in the middle of a real boom time on both sides of the atlantic.

    David Haye generated 400,000 buys in the UK and HBO’s last 2 ppv’s in the states have reached over a million buys, boxing’s really got its act together over the last 2 years. And with buy rates like that the ppv market seems to be working just fine.

    In both Britain and America all ppv stars are household names barring carl froch.

  • mike collins says:

    i agree, its like i wrote this myself

  • Guest says:

    Great article.
    Money is the issue in most sports nowadays.
    Do you think Mayweather or Pacquiao would be waiting until next year for there possible bout if they were being paid what say Sugar Ray Robinson was paid? No chance, they would be in the ring tommorrow.

  • Guest says:

    I hate it when I am randomly blocked from commenting on certain articles – especially when I have just written an essay on the subject matter.

  • nick says:

    great article pay per view is killing boxing along with greed by promoters and fighters only wanting the really big paying fights.also the big name fighters only want to fight once or maybe twice a year. boxing in the UK can bring in big viewing figures again if it goes back on terrestrial tv with good match ups. that way we can make our world and domestic champions into household names again.

  • DEL-BOY says:

    good article i like watchin amir kahn but i have to agree he isnt pay per view material not yet anyways.I can understand why ufc is growing at a rapid rate the undercard is alot better in most cases than boxing ones and the big one if you want to be the champion of a division you have to fight the best no ducking oponents.

  • dean says:

    greed greed greed says the promoter !!! go back to having a few more fights on free tv to build up fighters names , so people know who they are .. it would be better for boxing as a whole ..does almost every fight have to be for a “title” ?? it is diminishing the sport ..20 or 30 years ago boxing was king ..some of us remember fights on abc and usa tuesday night fights ..we miss them ..

  • Daud says:

    Great point with the pay per view thing. I remember when I was young watching the likes of Ali, Sugar Ray Leonard, and Hagler on ABC sports. That’s a free station you don’t even need cable to get. Try that these days. It would never happen.

  • Harlan says:

    Great Article! Top marks, I think there needs to be more tournaments like the one in the super-middle weight division!! A lightweight, light-welterweight, welterweight tournament would be mouth-watering.

  • Anonymous says:

    I agree wholly with this. You forgot bruno too. He was huge in the 80′s as a celebrity, every kid knew who he was. That’s the key difference for me though, back in the day boxers had personality. I think it’s true in any sport though. That’s why haye is a revelation, he has that charisma.

    What would help in my mind is morefighters that people can actually care about. Look at the British fighters that capture the imagination. Hatton, haye, eubank, benn, lewis, Bruno, and so on…

  • Daniel Ciminera says:

    im a brit too. hence the tommy farr reference, he was from my hometown.

    and i think haye is a welcome breeze in the heavyweight division. but why, because there’s nobody else. he wouldnt have cut it in years gone by.

  • sacha says:

    your main problem is american boxers are too boreing for american fans boxers like b hop,dirrel and maywaeather are to defensive thats why and i know for a fact american fight fans now watch ufc , if it wasnt for the likes of david haye i think boxing would be in a wrose state so dont brit bash him i know for a fact if he was american he would be the next best thing in american eyes but hes not hes a brit and you cant c past that lol

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!