Comments on: Abraham vs. Dirrell at Madison Square Garden – Boxing News

By: Pertsh

Pertsh — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:55:09 +0000

you are being extremely bias. you need to take into consideration that Abraham has much more experience, and a much better record. you are only saying that you think Dirrell will win and why, but you need to write an argument to that, which is why people think Abraham will win.

By: MarathonMan1

MarathonMan1 — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:00:14 +0000

Who gets the Benny Hill award in Boxing???

By: Social Network

Social Network — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:05:34 +0000

I am 100% sure that Drrell will not go home, he will for sure go to hospital and probably quit boxing after fight with Abraham. Believe me I know what I am saying!!! You don’t believe? then see this Dlinked.com

By: T Money

T Money — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:46:46 +0000

I would never pay money to watch a fighter with Dirrell’s style. I think America will enjoy Abraham’s style more. Just check out the pay per view numbers of MMA or the Old Mike Tyson fights.

By: Bergamasco

Bergamasco — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:30:45 +0000

I think Froch and Dirrel are the worst boxers of Super6. Dirrell proved better, but he landed few punches to deserve the decision. In a football (you Americans call it “soccer”) match, it would have been 0-0. No-skills against no-character.

Abraham is great, the logic favourite of Super6, but Taylor was able to trouble him. I didn’t seen the elbow shot. Abraham was clearly ahead at the moment of KO.
If Taylor recovers from the 2 KOs, he has chances with everybody.

Ward-Kessler, spectacular match. Claps, claps to both!

By: Gra

Gra — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:38:49 +0000

You might be right that Dirrell will win, but your analysis couldn’t be worse. Abraham has developed a style that has given him a long winning streak. He uses his amazing punching power to intimidate fighters by punching little but effectively in the first few rounds, giving them a taste of what is to come and making them panic and up their work rate. Then, around round five or six, when he sees they’re spooked and getting tired, he ups the ante every round until they fall. As, I predict, Dirrell will.

By: tiko

tiko — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:51:08 +0000

man…this guys is an idiot. AA is a great BOXER..he takes his time, develops a stategy and sticks with it. he has the best defense in the super six, one of the stogest punches and is a smart boxer. he doesnt do anything hes not supposed to. i think the fight is going to start as usual slow for AA. dirrel is going to take a quick lead the first five rounds. then direll is goin to get tired, and AA is going to knock him out in the 10th.

By: Stuart McLeod

Stuart McLeod — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:43:12 +0000

biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig knob comes to mind

By: mark f

mark f — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:52:08 +0000

Can Dirrell sell tickets for an arena? we already know Chad Dawson cant.

By: Daud

Daud — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:12:13 +0000

i thought i was the only one that saw the elbow he gave taylor. i too am not impressed with abraham and see dirrell winning the tourney

By: Bmastermind

Bmastermind — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:03:31 +0000

hellooooooooo. thats abrahams style he waits, he waits and he waits , then he comes at you and knocks you out, the guy is still unbeaten, he knows whats he doing and he is going to win against dirrel, no matter where the fight takes place. As far as dirrell vs froch i think direll won that fight, and it was a very unfair decision.

By: D.Solis

D.Solis — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:59:42 +0000

I don’t know why everybody is saying dirrelll ran all night,he didn’t.Dirrell also stood in front of froch and landed combinations,so what was the excuse for froch not answering for those shots landing.Dirrell fought the way a speedy skilled boxer does when he is faced against an aggressive fighter that tries to walk you down.You back him up with your fast jab and then land your combination and get out of the way to set it up again.So thats what he did and he lost the fight for it ,just because all the brits wanted to see froch brawl and it didn’t happen theyre saying that dirrell ran all night.Well too bad this ain’t burger king you can’t always have it your way,this is boxing.Dirrell gave froch a boxing lesson and hes gonna do the same against the so called german king arthur.

By: chris

chris — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:03:04 +0000

Scott, don’t suddenly make out you like carl froch by saying you think he’s a great fighter. You could have fooled me. You hate the bloke, all you do is slag him and other euro fighters off. Every one of your articles either slags off a euro or goes on about how an american fighter got a dodgey decision vs a euro. Why dont u fu*k off you racist pri*k.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:44:13 +0000

Oh great this means dirrell can run all night and steal the victory.

By: Shelton

Shelton — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:41:57 +0000

Euro fans are biased. To a point its not their fault, we as american have been dominated boxing for year but instead of being humble about we brag and down grade their boxing when they have any success. This is the same reason many hate Pretty Boy Floyd. Now I do feel Abraham is limited but could he win by late stoppage…Yes. The test for Dirrell will be to be standing after 12 because he will win if he does but if he doesn’t we know the result. On another note Kessler is amazing with a little more coaching he can be a boxing legend. Ward vs Kessler will excellent, two highly underrated warriors going at it…getting chills thinking about it