I thought Fury Beat McDermott quite easily

fury453434By Scott Gilfoid: After watching Friday night’s clash between British heavyweights Tyson Fury (8-0, 7 KO’s) and Big John McDermott (25-6, 16 KO’s), I’m in full agreement with referee Terry O’Conner about Fury having won the fight. I had Fury winning eight rounds to two for McDermott. Referee O’Conner had Fury winning 98-92, the exact same as me.

Personally, I could care less which fighter won the fight because I’m no fan of either of them, but I got to tell like it is. Fury won the fight. The fat guy, McDermott, didn’t consistently work hard in every round and it was all he could do to muster up three, sometimes four, good shots per round. You can’t give it to a guy like that when he’s getting his head jabbed nearly off.

While big boy McDermott would be resting in every round, Fury was tagging him with a lot of short hooks with both hands. They weren’t huge shots but in the absence of anything coming back from smothering McDermott, I had to give the rounds to Fury. I could only score the 1st and the 4th rounds to McDermott.

In the other rounds that McDermott did well in, the 8th and 9th rounds, Fury came back in the last minute of the round to steal it away from big boy. That’s not Fury or O’Conner’s fault. It’s all on McDermott. If he wanted to win the rounds, he should have fought hard all the way through them instead of landing some good shots early and then tiring out and basically trying to crowd and smother Fury.

McDermott was beaten to the punch in the last half of every round because he would get tired and just try and rest on Fury’s chest. I don’t blame McDermott for doing that because if I was carrying all that fat I’d be trying to rest all the time to. But you can’t reward a fighter rounds just because he lands three good punches in the first minute of the round, and then does nothing in the last two minutes.

I think for a lot of British boxing fans, they’re blinding by the screams from the pro-McDermott crowd. What they don’t realize, and I don’t blame them for being ignorant, is that this fight took place in McDermott’s neck of the woods in Brentwood, in Essex.

That’s McDermott’s home turf, so if you want to watch the fight, you have to turn down the sound and the drone of those British talking heads. If you listen them crow about how great McDermott looked all fight, it just had to have an effect on you. I could barely understand them through their thick accents, so I turned the volume down not to have to listen to them jabber and froth at the mouth over McDermott.

So what I saw was a fat guy that turned his back on Fury more than a couple of occasions in the last two rounds and ran across the ring. I never seen stuff like that from a professional fighter. Fury was turning the heat up on McDermott and really outworking him, in particular in the last three rounds. Those are the championship rounds, people.

You can’t slack off and think you’re going to win the fight if you’re lazy in the last three. I back O’Conner to the hilt in his decision. He got it right and the rest of you who saw McDermott winning, you need to watch the fight again and turn down the pro-McDermott crowd noise and the nonstop chattering of the talking head announcers and watch for yourself.

McDermott only landed a few good shots every round, usually in the first minute of the round, and was outworked in the last two minutes. He ate a ton of jabs in the fight and smothered his own shots by getting too close to Fury. It looks like Fury will fight him again, although I don’t know why he should.

Big boy had his chance and he lost and even worse, he lost in front of his home crowd with them screaming their heads off like maniacs. If you can’t win under those circumstances, why should Fury waste time fighting McDermott again? I wouldn’t.

If McDermott wanted to win, maybe he should have lost some weight and been in condition to work hard for the full three minutes of every round like Fury instead of trying to smother and wrestle with him on the inside. Fury said it himself after the fight, “I was the one working. He [McDermott] was trying to maul in close.” I totally agree with Fury. When you’re fighting a wide body like McDermott, of course they’re going to try and smother and maul on the inside.

With that kind of weight that they’re carrying around, they can’t stand and trade for a full three minutes of every round without exhausting themselves. But you don’t give them a victory for landing three good punches per round coupled with a ton of ugly wrestling.

You got to work hard like Fury and what the home crowd feels about it doesn’t matter. Fury won the fight and that’s the way it is and the way it should have been. I got a lot of respect for O’Conner. He got the decision right and you people who think he blew it, should be kissing his backside and apologizing. He’s a class act. Fury did a great job in this fight and I thought he looked excellent. He needs to work on his power a little and keeping the fight at a distance, but besides that, he looked damn good for a 21-year-old fighter with only eight fights.


Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

32 Responses to “I thought Fury Beat McDermott quite easily”

  • colin bailey says:

    Who did I watch you fight tonight Fury? Dunno never heard of him, your hype and back-handers are becoming painful. Frank Bruno must be considering retirement surely?

    You are a joke, Roy Shaw would have chewed you up and spit you out you fake…in fact Roy may re-apply for a license (legend).

  • colin bailey says:

    I want to fight Fury, purse bids please?

  • colin bailey says:

    John Mcdermott will tell ya, I would knock the Fury out in 3 rounds,…

  • colin bailey says:

    I want to fight Tyson, easy…

  • colin bailey says:

    Go back to bingo mate as you have no idea about boxing

  • Michael Payne says:

    Scott you idiot those “talking heads” with there “thick accents” know more about boxing than you ever will. Shut your mouth & go write about a sport you know about………

  • Gaz says:

    Clearly a lot of ppl thought McDermott won, I thought it was close with Fury winning based on a higher punch volume but not necesserily better quality. very much down to individual perception though

    Iv also just read that referee O’Connor was knocked out by McDermott’s father and corner man back in the 70′s!

  • wickerman08 says:

    Watch it with the commentary off and Fury clearly wins as he was the busier fighter…Completely agree. It pains me to say it as Scott is border line racist to us here in the UK but there you go.

  • Funky says:

    I to though Tyson had great potential. But, his hands were down too much, nearly all his punches were arm punches with no power and he didnt jab enough. If McDermott can get him out his game then british level is as far as he’s going.

    But he’s still young and has alot to learn, i think he should continue fighting at this level now to improve

  • mike says:

    before I thought Tyson had potential to be really good,He should be 7-1 now.Judging on how this fight went.I beleve there going to be putting him up against lesser oppisition now.

  • Chris Hardy says:

    Clean effective punching scott you idiot….. you cant give a fight to someone that just throw punches that are blocked……. bell end…

  • Ian Curragh says:

    I know that scoring boxing fights is subjective but the decision for Fury was an utter disgrace. The only way you could post an 98-92 score for Fury is if you score points for blocking punches with your head. A rematch is required to sort out this mess.

  • dougie says:

    you must have been watching another fight big john won that fight easy even me big boxing fan was shocked at furys porformace a did think he was the best hope 4 a title since lewis but after big john who aint the best in britain beat him an never got the desion a have a differnt veiw on fury dont no why herbie hide dosent move up an whip all the heavyweights in britain oot

  • Anonymous says:

    Danny Williams will DESTROY Fury!! & that’s really saying something.

  • frank says:

    I had fury by a round r 2. He worked harder over the 3min each round. Glad he got the decision, hes a better chance of doing something but cant see him do much on world stage, with a new trainer, who knows, hes only 21. Think hes been brought on too quickly

  • wellsini says:

    I watched this fight and the decision was a disgrace!

    Trouble for Tyson now is surely now he is the English champion he will have to go after the British champion after a tune up fight does anyone think this guy can beat Danny Williams?

    After that he must step up to the commonwealth championship and no way will he beat Sam Sexton or Martin Rogan.

    This fight camne far too early for Tyson

  • Sam says:

    Neither of these fighters are going anywhere.

    Does anyone have the statistics on how many punches fury landed in the fight against big mac?

    It was a close fight but I would have to give it to the fatty by 1 or 2 rounds.

  • Sro says:

    Dear oh dear Mr Gilfoid…when will you write a decent article? People want to read them…but you just wont write one.

    Apart from a thinly veiled dig at the British (yet again) – one thing you have to realise is that alot of people ARE fans of these two fighters and in order to have a professional website with far more substantial articles and readers you need to write balanced, well supported arguements. You just seem to attack anyone British. Why is that?

    The fight was close but I had Mcdermott winning as Tyson seemed average at best and his inexperience was plain to see. I am a fan of Tyson but he needs a condtioning coach and he should stop listening to his own hype.

    Mr Gilfoid why wont you write a decent article?

  • sidp says:

    i belive that fury won by 1 point….. but the training by john fury is showning to be poor. tyson doesnt seem to be any better now than he was in feb.

    he has the skills but needs someone like emanual stewart to take over his traing.

  • ALAN BOSWORTH says:

    WELL SED STEVE I AGREE GILFOID LOOKS STUPID SAYING THAT

  • j says:

    scott please stop writing articles

  • David says:

    i had it as a draw or mcdermott won by 1 round

    he fought fury much better than fury thought he would

  • deano71 says:

    scott were you one of the 3 blind mice that scored it even between lewis v holyfield 1 coz judgeing by your article you must of been!!!but i do love reading your wind up material,it still baffles me how some people still bite they must surely realise your NUTS.

  • Carrick says:

    Tyson was the busy fighter in the ring, and still didnt land as much as McDermott. McDermott landed 114 and Tyson landed 104. The commentators we’re right, McDermott was landing the cleaner punches and had a hit ratio of 37% or something. McDermott could have been deducted points in the last round, turning his back away and walking towards the ropes. The Referee was awful in that fight, bad throughout the fight and a terrible decision.

    Tyson showed guts and he was brave, also shown he has a good solid chin too, but he lost that fight. I hope they have a rematch, only because i want to see if Tyson can learn from his mistakes and show that he is worth the hype.

  • anon says:

    every round was competitive and close,so if you favor one guy over the other in the close rounds it is possible too have a wide margin in even a close fight.but what i do agree on with the writer is the commentators or fans have an impact on how we c a fight, ive watched a fight with british commentary and then american and both times ive had a slightly different scorecard.they have a way of making you c there way by going on about one thing or other and then looking out for it in the next round

  • Matt Porter says:

    Shut up Scott, no-one gives a damn about your anaylsis on our fights in the UK or anywhere for that matter. He landed 40% of his punches, more than double Fury, and Fury couldn’t hurt him, Mcdermott always gets screwed over.

  • lee robertson says:

    Scott I never read your article but if u agree with the ref then you know nothing about boxing or how to score it.

    that decison was a fix and i recon due to the heavy betting in favour of fury

    Nonsense

  • duffy says:

    even thoe i was supporting tyson, john was the true winner.

  • Rich says:

    This fight was an awful lot closer than people are making out. I was watching from ringside and thought that Mcdermott had won by maybe two rounds and was shocked when the decision went Fury’s way. Having re-watched the fight today, i’ve actually reversed the decision to 96-95 to fury with the third round a draw. I think that the ref was bonkers to give the fight to fury by such a wide margin, but giving fury the win does not constitute daylight robbery. Mcdermott’s work was the cleaner, but fury was throwing in clusters with blows that were more glancing but could be called scoring shots. A re-match is the only fair way of settling the argument and i hope tthat fury is as good as his word.

  • ben says:

    tyson worked a lot harder but mc big mac landed the better punches on the night i had mcdermott winning by 2 rounds there is no way on earth tyson won 8 rounds your the biggest idiot on the planet if you think that you know nothing about boxing please keep your thoughts to yourself gilfoid your a very silly man

  • Adz says:

    I also gave Tyson Fury the fight by 96-94. However, some of the rounds were so drab and difficult to score that I would not have been surprised in the slightest had McDermott got the nod.

    I think O’Connor’s scoring was shocking, there is no way Fury won by 6 rounds. His jab (although weak) was his only saving grace that night and I think it’s clear he’ll struggle to get anywhere near the world stage unless he improves drastically on his footwork, power and stamina.

  • Fletch says:

    you have proved time and time again what an idiot you are mr gilfoid only you the ref thought tyson won no one els did!!!

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!