The Case For Joe Calzaghe – Boxing

cal45634339By M.T.H: Joe Calzaghe was one of the most accomplished fighters that Great Britain has ever produced, and the world has ever known. He was the model fighter of remarkable consistency, and one of the elite competitors of this or any generation. His achievements in the 168lbs division make him unquestionably the greatest Super-Middleweight ever.

Calzaghe won the first of his five world titles in 1997. It was in a fight against the former two-time World Champion and British legend, Chris ‘Simply the Best’ Eubank. Eubank was highly regarded by many. He was unbeaten as a Middleweight and had wins over Nigel Benn and Michael Watson on his illustrious record.

Although Calzaghe was still untested at the highest level going into the fight, he managed to drop Eubank in the first round and shock the world by winning a comfortable and unanimous decision. Calzaghe’s dynasty had begun…..

After two successful WBO title defence against a hungry young contender, Branko Sobot and a former opponent of both Eubank and Benn, Juan Ferreya, Calzaghe faced former WBC World Champion and domestic rival, Robin Reid. Calzaghe was able to overcome this tricky foe and win a split decision victory. Although, many people at ringside felt that Calzaghe was unlucky not to be awarded a unanimous decision victory by the judges on the night.

Calzaghe’s consistency would become one of his greatest attributes. He would go on to successfully defend his WBO World Championship on 21 different occasions. Some of his opponents were late replacements. They were not always great fighters, but most showed a keen sense of hunger, and a strong sense of desire to defeat Calzaghe and to take his belt back with them to their native country. Amongst the more tricky opponents Calzaghe faced during his WBO reign were former World Champions like Byron Mitchell, Ritchie Woodhall and Charles Brewer, as well as a tough British Champion in David Starie.

Another notable opponent was Mario Veit. Veit was young German who had earned his shot at the WBO title by amassing an unbeaten 30-0 record. Calzaghe put on a brief but masterful performance and won the fight via TKO in the very first round. Subsequent to his defeat at the hands of Calzaghe, Veit went on an unbeaten 15 fight streak which once again placed him in contention for a title challenge.

The rematch that everyone had been waiting for, would take place four years later in 2005. By this time a series of hand injuries had rendered Calzaghe as a slightly less accomplished puncher, and Veit was able to survive for six rounds, until finally succumbing to the Welshman’s onslaught.

Calzaghe built upon his early successes, and begin to look towards his first career defining fight. The fight would take place in 2005, just eight short years after winning his first World Championship.

His opponent on the night would be the fearsome, young and undefeated American, Jeff ‘Left Hook’ Lacy. Lacy was a betting favourite for the fight, and had recently defeated former Calzaghe foe, Robin Reed, and Super-Middleweight stalwart, Omar Sheika.

Although Calzaghe had some hand injury troubles in the build up that put his participation into question, the fight took place on a barmy March evening in Manchester, England. Calzaghe dominated the fight from start to finish and completely outclassed the tough Lacy. The Welshman eventually won a unanimous decision. In doing so he picked up another world title and the IBF Super-Middleweight Championship belt. He had also introduced himself in spectacular fashion to the important demographic of the American audience.

Capitalizing on his growing fame, Calzaghe faced contenders Peter Manfredo Jr. and Sakio Bika in his next two contests. He won both fights. Calzaghe then set his sights on unbeaten WBA and WBC World Champion Mikkel Kessler. The unification fight took place in front of 50,000 fans at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff. Calzaghe was given problems early on but managed to overcome the difficult Dane and unify the Super -Middleweight division, in some style, winning the third and fourth of his five World Championship belts.

Having accomplished this extraordinary feat of boxing unification, Calzaghe looked to America for his next challenge, which came in the shape of legendary fighter and modern great, Bernard ‘The Executioner’ Hopkins. Calzaghe had often been labeled as a ‘stay at home fighter’, despite the fact that twenty eight of his forty six fights took place outside of his native Wales.

The fight with Hopkins would take place in Las Vegas, USA at the weight limit of 175lbs for The Ring Magazine’s linear Light-Heavyweight Championship of the World.

Calzaghe was caught cold and sent to the canvass early on by a lucky blow from Hopkins. But by once again showing great resilience and determination, Calzaghe outfought and outworked Hopkins, and won the fight via split decision. Most ringside observers agreed with the judges and thought that Calzaghe clearly won the fight.

It was almost time for Calzaghe to call it a day and end his fabulous career, and what better way than to face another ring legend, Roy Jones Jr. at the boxing citadel of Madison Square Garden in New York City. Calzaghe was the easy winner on the night and was able to add another name to his glittering resume of forty six contests without defeat.

After years of hand injuries and extraordinary accomplishments, the time finally came for Calzaghe to hang up the gloves and announce to his tens of millions of fans that he was retiring from the sport of boxing.

Conclusion

Calzaghe won five world titles. He was a five-time World Champion. He unified the Super-Middleweight division and become the linear Light-Heavyweight Champion. His greatness has been proved beyond doubt, and his sporting legacy and permanent place in boxing history is secure.

Be Sociable, Share!

22 Responses to “The Case For Joe Calzaghe – Boxing”

  • Awsome says:

    Calzaghe won the Hopkins fight clearly! He beat the BEST middleweight around(with the exception of Calzaghe himself) & beat him at his peak in Mikkel Kessler.
    & if anything Joe Calzaghe was one of the most under-rated boxers of all time & just like Lennox Lewis, Calzaghe will truly be appreciated in a few years time!

  • Blade says:

    thats last decade

  • Blade says:

    Grear article for a great fighter,joe has no more to prove to anyone,would have liked him to have had reid a rematch but apart from that i got no complaints,everyone fights bums sometimes but they all wasn’t maanfredo’s or rick thornberrys,he had some cracking fights and stood the test of time.He a def top 10 p4p of the lst decade

  • Anonymous says:

    How can people honestly say Froch would beat Calzaghe? i’m british and still think froch is one of the worst boxers around, joe would have schooled him just like he did everyone else

  • RMC says:

    MTH – Have read both articles pro JC and against JC’s legacy. A very good bit of writing, showing both sides views. Congratulations

  • The Chunk says:

    Interesting, just posted a message on the other thread saying it was rubbish.

    Didn’t realise it was part of two parter!

    Interesting how you can show the same thing in 2 different lights and make it look very different.

    Good effort.

  • AndyBoy says:

    Unfortunately for Calzaghe I think he will always have to deal with the question of his status in the game.

    Title fights against the likes of Tocker Pudwill, Mger Mkrtchyan and Kabary Salem during his reign will always reflect badly on him. Plus his decision to fight Jones Jr and Hopkins when they were well past their prime will sit badly with American fans.

    I think his record meant more to him than his legacy and for that he may well suffer with historians, while the casual fan will always focus on the unbeaten career.

  • mark f says:

    Great article, that’ll make Scott Gilfoid cry for an hour or write another load of bollocks showing his hate for calazaghe and his lack of boxing knowledge

  • Owen KO Rowe says:

    Sorry I meant super mid.

  • Owen KO Rowe says:

    Great article. I’m not sure the punch that took joe down against b-hop was ‘lucky’ but he had the boxing skills to outpoint him. And if b-hop is over the hill explain him absolutely schooling the next big thing in pavlik.

    Jones jnr is one of my fave boxers but he should never have taken joe on. He must have known he was done.

    Joe deserves to be mentioned with any super heavy weight and is a def hall of famer for me.

  • tommy says:

    easy hall of famer.good article

  • D says:

    M.T.H you really do arse lick joe. he is a good fighter but not that great. his fans act like he never got hit because he was too fast. but why do people say he had a good chin it is because he did get hit alot. he not a prime roy jones where he is pure taltent. any1 that has done boxing would realise that u can’t be tought what jones has done. as for joe being underated lenox leiws is underrated as he fought better people than joe and still beat every1 he faught. because joe retired underfeted people arse lick hem for no reason.

    i don’t beleive that joe was a chery picker but in the 90′s joe wasn’t good enough to beat jones or maybe hopkins. alot of expers would say that joe got better as he got older which would be in the 2000′s. his best win are to chris eubank who had 6 weeks to prpaire for the fight nad only fought 2 more times after that as he was done and dusted. and kessler. but you guys ahaven’t considered that if kessler loses he might get exposed as e aint beat alot of competition either. but joes fans see past this. the funnny thing is that when tarvar and glen knocked out joens people saw that as jones getting old and he was washed up but when joe beats him people see that as a great victory. iam british an i do surport our fighter but joe is one of our most pretected fighters. why can’t people see that. also u yanks have to calm down about joe being a fraud because he aint.

  • Adam says:

    Your out of your godamn mind. Calzaghe is a fraud and a coward. He retired so that he wouldn’t get his azz whooped by chad Dawson and Carl Froch. He faught old washed up american boxers and claimed greatness from that. He’s a chump and isn’t even in the top 10 of the greatest Super Middleweights of all time. Quit dreaming.

  • Anonymous says:

    great article, Joe is so underrated and gets no credit because he fought hopkins etc. who were past their prime but joe couldn’t even hit them with full power because of hand problems, and was way past his prime himself. Also the hopkins fight wasn’t even close, hopkins was too busy faking low blows to do anywhere near enough to win the fight

  • kıngy says:

    I easıly scored the Hopkıns bout for Joeç I dont thınk The executıoner had come remotly close to wınnıng.

  • wellsini says:

    Tim you say Calzaghe was happy fighting mandatory fighters.

    Surely they are mandatory because they have earned the right to fight for the title necause they are a little good at the art of pugilism…..?

    Calzaghe was a great fighter maybe his only mistake was not losing a fight it seems a guy with an “oh” next to his name is not good wnough to have the tag legend

    Jones Junior 5 losses…..legend
    hopkins 5 losses……….legend
    calzaghe 0 losses………lucky cherry picker

  • pp says:

    Excellent article !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • MichaelW says:

    Good Write up!!! Agree with it all.

  • flummex says:

    I actually thought Reid gave him a harder fight than Hopkins. The Hopkins fight was all about Hopkins trying to jab then hug Joe, Reid came to fight and fought very well. I had Joe winning by several rounds against Hopkins. Hopkins did not do enough to deserve a win & got hit more by Joe than any other fighter he has faced, but I thought the Reid fight could have been a draw.

    I know people criticise JC for fighting older fighters who were not in there prime, but JC was past his prime when he fought as far back as Lacy. A prime JC was hitting much harder than the guy who has been fighting the last few years. A prime JC would have destroyed any of today’s fighters.

  • Ben says:

    I dont get how anyone can say Hopkins deserved the win!!!

    Hes a dirty fighter, he makes his opponents look terrible, but he spent most of the time holding and eating fast but weak punches from Calzaghe.

    Theres no way Hopkins deserved that decision, it was a terrible fight to watch.

    I love hopkins too, im more of a fan of his than i am Joe Calzaghe.

  • Tim says:

    Ignore my previous comments as I just read your other article (didn’t see it before).

    Reading both I have to say they are much better than a lot of other garbage posted here (hi Scott).

    Keep up the good work

  • Tim says:

    I like the way you say people at ringside thought he won by unanimous decision against reid and hopkins lol. I think both those victories were controversial, especially the hopkins fight. In general I think Calzaghe was a very good fighter but not a legend, he avoided some great fights and was happy fighting mandatory’s until fighters like Jones were well past their best.

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!