Froch: “I honestly don’t believe I’ve reached my peak”
By Scott Gilfoid: WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch (25-0, 20 KO’s) keeps track of his training regimen like a detailed accountant, tracking every exercise he does. And at 32, Froch thinks he’s still improving as a fighter. But who knows if this is true or not.
It might very well be that Froch is getting slightly better as he ages, but the amount of improvement likely won’t be enough for him to win the Super Six tourney that Froch is about to take part in starting on October 17th.
It’s nice that Froch is tracking everything, but for him to use this as evidence that he’s getting better as a fighter seems a little flimsy and misguided on his part. However, if it gives himself belief, so be it. More power to him. I’d have a much better feeling about Froch and his ability if he didn’t just finish going life and death with Jermain Taylor on April 25th, needing a knockout in the last seconds of the bout to pull out the win.
Froch might as well scrap that diary that he’s filling out, because his progress needs to get a lot better if he plans on getting out of the group I part of the Super Six tourney, much less actually winning the thing. I’m all for Froch keeping track of his conditioning, because perhaps without being in the best shape possible, Froch probably would have been blown out of the water by Taylor last April.
Conditioning is one thing, but talent is quite another. It doesn’t matter if Froch doesn’t touch an M & M or eat a McDonald’s hamburger, if he doesn’t have the talent to beat extraordinary fighters like Andre Dirrell, Andre Ward, Mikkel Kessler or Arthur Abraham, what’s the whole point? Some fighters naturally have more talent than others and that’s just the way things are.
Froch may indeed be improving, but the amount of improvement needed to beat Kessler, Dirrell and Ward is probably off the chart for Froch and it may be physically impossible for him to do this with his body, no matter how hard he trains. Froch could train forever, but that doesn’t mean he could run 200 meters in 19 seconds. It’s just not going to happen.
In this tournament, Froch is facing fighters with better speed, boxing ability and with power as good as his own. And it doesn’t matter how much stuff Froch writes down in his diary about his training. Those guys are just super talented, which is why they were invited to the tourney in the first place. Now if Froch was making improvements that were suddenly off the chart, maybe I’d give him a slight chance at beating Ward, Dirrell, Kessler and Abraham.
However, I kind of doubt that the 32-year-old Froch is getting much better in any of his exercises at this age. He can down his Geritol, eat his Wheaties or whatever he takes to get the most out of his body, but I don’t think it’s going to help him in this case.
It takes talent to beat those kinds of fighters, and I don’t know that Froch has it in him. His come from behind win over Taylor was really telling. It seemed to show that Froch was at the peak of what he’s capable of doing, getting the most out of his body that he could. However, if Froch is barely beating fighters like Taylor, what does that tell you about Froch’s chances of winning the tourney?
Not too many people are giving Taylor any chance of winning the tournament. In fact, a lot of people see him getting eliminated in the group I part. If Froch is barely beating Taylor, it would suggest that his talent is more or less about the same level. Based on that, one could surmise that Froch will also be eliminated in the first portion of the tourney.
please use above banner to link back to us!
Froch gets some serious column inches on this site, seems like he must be the biggest name in the super 6 as everbody is talking about him and the other’s are barely getting a mention!
Scott – You have gone back to writing ridiculous articles again! I understand some points but to suggest that Froch’s performance against Taylor is a benchmark for what he can achieve in this tournament is stupid. Styles make fights my friend, the mentality of your opponent will dictate how the fight will go, there are all sorts of factors involved. You cannot simply base his chances on ONE FIGHT! and still even in the Taylor fight he kept coming, kept hunting and knocked Taylor, win is a win.
Look Scott we know your a wind up merchant but did you have a smile on your face when you called Ward and Dirrell extraordinary fighters, surely you meant ordinary. What have these two done to be included in this tournament.
“Those guys are just super talented, which is why they were invited to the tourney in the first place” …. was Froch not picked also? Why do you think that was – his looks?? LOL – wake up Scottie
‘if he doesn’t have the talent to beat extraordinary fighters like Andre Dirrell, Andre Ward.’
‘Froch may indeed be improving, but the amount of improvement needed to beat Kessler, Dirrell and Ward is probably off the chart for Froch.’
These two sentences alone show how deluded you are. Have Dirrell or Ward won a world title?…No.
Have they been at the top of world boxing for years?…No.
Can they attract a wide audience around the world, producing big PPV numbers?…No.
I am struggling to find one current boxer in the world who deserves to be labelled ‘extraordinary.’
So how can you possibly believe these two unproven (at world level) boxers deserve to be described in this way?
Not one boxer in the Super 6 is ‘extraordinary’ otherwise the division would have already been cleaned up by one boxer. It’s going a little far describing any of them as ‘super talented’ aswell. Four of the boxers have/have held world titles. Dirrell and Ward have not.
I am guessing now, but a lot of people would, including people outside of the UK agree with my opinion.
Not one of these boxers is extraordinary, but they are talented enough to make up the six.
Froch is rubbish
Calzaghe would av took him 2 school without a doubt.
People on this site biggin him up make me laugh.
Watch the taylor fight again (who was a blown up middleweight) and see how froch was LOSING BADLY untill taylors stamina ran out like normal.
Kessler will retire froch.
Im not sure froch is going to win the super 6.
But i believe he has the heart and the determination to win any fight, no matter who he is in there with.
It also seems that froch is not scared to lose.
If he loses one fight its not going to stop him fighting on with the right mindset to win next time.
I dont know why we put so much importance on been undefeated in boxing. In MMA its totally different. Losing is not the worse thing in the world, it can help you become a better fighter.
Hopkins lost his first ever boxing match!
scott if froch won the tourney u would still find flaws in him and sum 1 2 beat him! u just wish he was a yank dont u??????
Lets hope all the critics of Froch hold their hands up and admit they are wrong when he wins the Super6.Lets get it right , only Kessler is a threat.Froch will be a pound for pound top5 after this tournament….watch this space
I also want to read an article from you asking what your so called ‘superstar’ yank boxers will do with there carrers after they have all been KO’d at least twice!
Who have Dirrell or Ward fought that makes them such formidable opponents or is it just because they are “American”.
When this tournament starts, you yanks supporting your beacons of hope and freedom “Taylor, Ward and Dirrell” are in for a shock
Heres my predictions for Rnd 1.
Froch v Dirrell – Froch by KO Rnd 10
Abraham v Taylor – Abraham by KO Rnd 8
Kessler v Ward – Kessler by KO Rnd 3
We can all be biased Mr Gilfoid, how about you start writing articles which don’t make you look like a fool.
common scott, who are you kidding?
if hes improving all the time then why doesnt he use his jab more and keep his hands up,,,frochs gonna get ko,d in the super 6,
its boring now scott, clearly nothing froch ever can sya will stop you being negative, hes your new hatton, stp writting everyother article about froch itsw boring
Hahahahaha what a deluded article