Power, Poise and Posing: The Fistic Legacy of Prince Naseem Hamed

naseem543By Steven Pink: It is the uniquely paradoxical nature of boxing that very often the sport’s most skilled practitioners draw the ire and criticism of fans as readily as garnering admiration. Boxing’s iconoclasts from Muhammad Ali to Floyd Mayweather are derided for their idiosyncratic approach to the sport as often as they draw plaudits for their luminous skills. Yet few fighters in recent memory have polarized popular opinion quite so markedly as Naseem Hamed.

The Sheffield wunderkind regularly garnered rave reviews as he cut a swathe through the Featherweight division in the 1990’s, while simultaneously drawing the withering censure of the conservative element within the sport for his overt posing and histrionics, perceived lack of respect for his opponents and outrageous self confidence. In many ways Hamed represented a precursory template for modern day braggarts such as Mayweather and David Haye. Never one to hide his light under a bushel Hamed ceaselessly banged his own promotional drum and in doing so transformed himself into a huge box-office draw on both sides of the Atlantic.

Yet there was substance to be found behind the brash and abrasive exterior. Hamed, 36-1 (31), in a 5 ½ year run at the top of the 126 pound division, proved himself to be arguably the most consistently successful British boxer of all time and a candidate for the best Featherweight fighter of the last twenty years. At 5’ 5” he was a frighteningly potent composite of fistic talents. One punch knockout power allied to blinding speed and, in his earlier career at least, a uniquely loose limbed style of avoiding punches. While the Featherweight division, once the home of such luminaries as Willie Pep, Sandy Saddler, Ruben Olivares and Salvador Sanchez, toils in obscurity led as it is by competent though uninspiring champions such as Chris John, Steve Luevano and Takahiro Oah, it does us no harm to reflect on the last time the division truly captured the public’s imagination.

Like so many stellar prospects Hamed’s early career featured numerous matches against the journeymen opponents so beloved of matchmakers; and while wins over the likes of Ricky Beard, Miguel Matthews and Peter Buckley were anything but difficult or unexpected it was the poise, ring generalship and crunching power the young Sheffield prodigy displayed that marked him out as a uniquely precocious prospect. Trained by boxing sage Brendon Ingle Hamed’s style was a subtle variant on that used to good effect by stablemates Herol Graham and Jonny Nelson. Though what made the youngster stand out was his unique command of punching angles and his bewildering unorthodoxy in the ring. Dipping at the waste or swaying backwards Hamed would think nothing of launching huge uppercut leads or swinging hooks that often seemed to come up from the floor, yet were fired with such speed and precision that opponent after opponent simply found no answer to the puzzling conundrum poised by the diminutive battler. Only a few fights into his nascent professional career and Hamed was already becoming headline news.

Yet the press attention, while praising the ever rising catalogue of opponents reduced to immobile rubble in the ring, was not blind to the less savory elements of Hamed’s fistic makeup. His propensity for posing, taunting his opponents, dropping his hands and sticking out his chin combined with exaggerated back pedaling from exchanges all the time allied to a near ceaseless level of verbal sledging that would have done credit to an Australian cricketer, all served to alienate numerous armchair fans. It seemed that by the time he fought Vincenzo Belcastro, 28-6-3, for the European Bantamweight crown in only his 12th professional fight many of the crowd had paid in the hope of seeing the wily and experienced Italian shut his mouth. Yet when faced with better quality opposition Hamed invariably rose to the occasion. Belcastro was floored twice, in the first and the eleventh and dominated in a near virtuoso performance. The veteran of 37 fights was left a bemused and bewildered fighter, reduced to chasing shadows for the entire fight, while repeatedly soaking up punishment in return. The Prince pitched a shutout on two of the three scorecards.

At the age of twenty Hamed had annexed his first significant title. However, he was not to hang around at 118 pounds for long. He was maturing quickly, like modern day prodigy Manny Pacquiao adding weight and power while retaining his speed and poise. Indeed it is almost forgotten that in his early days Hamed garnered just as much praise for his defensive adroitness as his power. Indeed his in-ring radar was at times eerily reminiscent of a young Pernell Whittaker as he swayed, ducked and slipped his opponents punches; rarely ever taking a flush blow. Reeling off seven consecutive knockouts following the Belcastro match allowed Hamed to showcase his power for a wider audience, while giving him time to mature into a fully fledged 126 pounder. Among his most impressive wins in that knockout run were victories over Freddy Cruz, 44-6-6, and Sergio Liendo, 42-4-3, two men who had never previously been stopped. Hamed had shown he was ready for the big stage.

That stage was to be the bear pit of a Cardiff ice rink in front of 16,000 screaming Welshmen, united to a man in the common cause of supporting their hero, WBO Featherweight titleholder Steve Robinson. Hamed, who had never previously fought at the weight, had harangued Robinson at every turn over the preceding months, loudly proclaiming that he had the beating of the blue-collar champion. Many detractors claimed that Hamed’s mouth and promotional clout as much as his fists had secured the title opportunity. Though it must be said that the streaking Hamed, 18-0 (16), was big box office and presented Robinson with his most lucrative payday and highest profile fight.

Robinson, 21-9-1, was a brave and competent fighter who had risen from journeyman status to become a respected champion. He boasted championship victories over the likes of Colin McMillan, Paul Hodkinson and Duke McKenzie and was teak tough, battle hardened and comfortable in the trenches. Yet Hamed, in what many critics still believe to be his defining performance, annihilated the Welshman with a punch perfect display of precision boxing, defensive guile and concussive hitting. Robinson was hammered to defeat in eight rounds, after having been floored three times in all. Hamed had shown focus in ignoring the spittle soaked opprobrium of a rabidly hostile crowd and earmarked himself as a stellar talent in ripping away Robinson’s title in his backyard. A star was born that night; one who was to go on to set his own name proudly among the dazzlingly effulgent firmament of boxing’s elite champions over the next five years.

With Hamed’s public profile spiraling the flamboyance and showmanship was ratcheted up to a higher level. Borrowing from professional wrestling’s gaudy ring entrances Hamed was to variously enter the ring borne on a palanquin, march down a fashion runway and trot to the ring in a Halloween mask. He even went as far as to be deposited in the ring by an elevator set up in the MEN Arena. These bizarre ring walks (or potentially humbling exercises in hubris as some saw it) speak volumes about the Herculean confidence of a man, who while riding the crest of his championship wave, simply believed that he could not be beaten. The statistics between 1995 and 2001 emphasize that he was not wrong, though his conceit did render him something of pantomime villain among much of the British public and press.

Hamed, unlike too many of today’s cosseted and pampered title holders, proved to be a refreshingly active champion. What is even more laudable is that he chose (with a few notable exceptions) to defend his crown against the cream of his division’s crop. His run at the top saw him defeat a number of notable foes. The lanky and awkward former IBF Champion Manuel Medina, 52-7, was stopped, despite the wearying effects of a heavy cold, in eleven rounds. Tom Johnson, 44-2-2, the long serving IBF titleholder who was making his 12th defence, was hammered to defeat in ten rounds. Wilfredo Vasquez, who was demolished inside seven rounds, chose to vacate his WBA title in order to accommodate Hamed, who was quickly becoming the number one draw in the lighter weight divisions. Sadly boxing politics served to deny the sport a unification fight. Though interestingly Hamed was to go on to outpoint the rugged WBC king Cesar Soto, 54-7-2, in a rough and tumble battle in October 1999 which made him the only British fighter ever to have captured all four of the major alphabet association belts. For good measure Naseem also stopped IBF Super Bantamweight ruler Vuyani Bungu (who had previously made thirteen defences of his 122 pound belt) and future champion Paul Ingle (in a give and take struggle in which a seemingly shattered Hamed somehow managed to find the finishing left hand howitzer to knock out his previously unbeaten foe).

However, Hamed’s most thrilling performance was against the skilled and hard hitting Kevin Kelley, 47-1-2, in New York. In what must be accounted a featherweight version of Hagler-Hearns the two men traded multiple knockdowns over four thrilling rounds, with Hamed rallying from the very brink of defeat to level the Flushing native with a chilling left hander. It was the fight that would cement Naseem’s legacy as the most exciting fighter in the sport and one in which he even managed to earn the grudging respect of a hitherto scathingly critical Larry Merchant who was calling the fight for American television. Hamed had proved he could come through a war and rise from the canvas to down the very best fighters the division had to offer. While his chin (never perceived as iron clad following knockdowns against Daniel Alicea and Paul Ingle) had been clearly dented, notwithstanding issues of balance, his fighting heart had allowed him to prevail.

Yet the fight also provided vivid evidence that The Prince was entering what was to become a steady decline. The reflexes that had carried him through numerous battles over the years were slipping and he was becoming ever more easy to hit. This was partly due to the fact that as the knockouts mounted Hamed began to approach each fight as if a stoppage was inevitable. In doing so he neglected his skills and eventually allowed them to atrophy. By the time he faced Marco Antonio Barrera in 2001 he had become something of a one-dimensional puncher. The grace and fluidity of his early ring outings was now little more than a distant memory. Combinations became less frequent as Hamed became a stalking puncher obsessed with landing the big left hand. His fight against the hard-hitting Augie Sanchez, 26-1, provided further evidence of Hamed’s, by now, one-track approach. Both fighters were stunned in a wildly exciting slugfest before Hamed found the punches to stop the American in the fourth; it was to be his last successful defence; a life and death struggle against an opponent he would have dissected a few years previously. At the age of twenty-seven Hamed, by now a millionaire husband and father had fallen out of love with the sport. The contentment of his home life proved ever harder to abandon for the Spartan rigours of camp and he became an increasingly reluctant trainer. These chickens came home to roost against Barrera, who boxed smartly to soundly outpoint a strangely plodding and distracted Hamed and in doing so handed him his one and only defeat. Strangely Naseem was to fail to take up the rematch clause stipulated in his contract and the solitary defeat was never to be avenged.

For many the tepid nature of Hamed’s capitulation against Barrera irrevocably tarnished his legacy. Looked at objectively what one must take into account is Hamed’s dwindling appetite for the sport as well as the noticeable decline in his skills. Losing to Barrera was no disgrace. The Mexican holds his own place amongst the elite of boxing’s pantheon and would have given any featherweight of recent vintage a stiff tussle on that particular night. Many other extenuating factors can be called to account to throw further light on this one career aberration. Hamed was no longer working with long time trainer Ingle, while his dwindling motivation had resulted in a fractious and desultory training camp. Yes, Hamed could have re-motivated himself and sought redemption in a rematch. That he chose to forgo this privilege and walk away from the sport a year later at the age of twenty-eight should be weighed up and analyzed in the context of the many great champions who foolishly went on for far too long, returning to the ring long after the fistic well spring of their talent had been bled dry.

Hamed possessed everything necessary to secure greatness. He was skilled, exciting, hard hitting and flamboyant. His fights were almost universally exciting and his knockout wins most often spectacular. He showed heart in blazing back to defeat Alicea, Kelley and Ingle and always displayed a willingness to fight the very best opponents, often in their own country or hometown. Most importantly of all he displayed longevity reigning as the unquestioned number one in his division for many years. Hamed, forever the iconoclast chose to follow his own path and left the sport, if not at the summit of the mountain then gazing contentedly from the foothills secure that a peak conquered once need not be reattempted. In an age of tepid and unspectacular champions we should remember The Prince fondly. It may be some time before we see his like again.

Share and Enjoy:

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MySpace
  • MSN Reporter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Live
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS

Back To Boxing News 24 l Boxing News Facebook Version

27 Responses to “Power, Poise and Posing: The Fistic Legacy of Prince Naseem Hamed”

  • steve starr says:

    great fighters are only great when they lose and come back even better! naz could not do that so i say he was a good fighter but not a great (sorry naz) you were fun to see fight but thats it!

  • Liolo says:

    ‘It is the uniquely paradoxical nature ‘, sum1 explain what the f uk that means. remember, WRITER, that alot of boxing fans are working class an dont understand wierd words.

  • Blade says:

    Jesus,c’mon guy’s (or gals),Naz was a great showman but that’s it,he could’t fight and after the kelly fight was exposed.Who did the guy actually beat in their prime,best i can come up with is paul ingle!Vasquez,robinson,johnson perfect timing by frank warren.He fought one great in barerra and got took back to school,it was embarassing!Imagine how he’d have gone on with morales,pac man,marquez!Games up over!!

  • i love khan says:

    Hameds good, but not great. very average. good article by the way.

  • KELLY says:

    I agree with the statement that NASEEM HAMED is the greatest feather weight fighter for at least the last 20 years and perhaps the greatest ever. He is also likely the greatest ever British fighter, or is certainly in their company.

    Fighters like Naseem inspire all of us.

    I hope he inspires Ricky Hatton to come back as I still believe that Ricky Hatton has a lot of victories in front of him.

  • Wayne Lord says:

    Tbone, you are so correct. Naz’s legs were very powerful for such a small man. I always wondered if e did something to develop that power Michael Spinks also had tree trubks for legs and had same kind of one shot power with his right cross. He too could take a very good shot until Tyson hit him. I think his legs sent a message to his head.

    Seriously, Naz had the incredible reflexes that the exceptional athlete like Jones and Ali had. I think Wilferdo benitez and Whitaker also had that radar like ability to evade punches at the last possible minute. But only Naz, Jones & Robinson could also deliver that concussive shot as they were pulling backwards.
    It is more difficult than it sounds to hit that hard leaning backwards. You must have reflexes, timing, power & speed combined to do it. I agree that only Ali was able to reinvent himself when those gifts started to erode.
    I wish Super Roy would do the same. First he has to forget 175. He was always very strong &d could tie up any fighter. At 175 he no longer can do it. So why fight there? I am sure it is tough to get there but 185 and up would give him back strength and confidence to execute a game plan.

    Naz however has been away too long to come back, but if he did, his timing would be way off. I am sure he would still have power like Super Roy. It is the last thing that goes. But he too should go up I think maybe 135 would be fine. Super Roy and King Naz, two superlative athletes!

  • art says:

    naz was annoying but always entertaining, i think barrera humiliated him so much he was embarassed to show his face again.

  • Lee says:

    Fewer fighters have brought new fans to the sport.. boxing another Naz to bring back the veiwers now

    By far the most entertaining fighter I’ve watched and he backed it up too with convincing performances. He is the reason I got into boxing and will probably remain my favourite fighter for many many years to come

  • joe bob says:

    Nice article. NO ONE CAN OR WILL COME CLOSE TO NAZ! Today boxing you don’t get your moneys worth!

  • Sam says:

    He was a fantastic boxer, great to watch with a very tricky unorthodox style, and his speed and power was amazing for a featherweight.

    He was an arrogant man tho, I read in Joe Calzaghes book, he was bragging to carl thompson (the man who knocked out david haye a few years back!) how much more money he earnt then him, goading him, a guy who weighs 8 stone 10, goading a man, who is in top shape and weighs over 14 stone!

  • tboneNYC says:

    With those big ring entrances and that one punch highlight real power.Prince Naseem Hamed was one of boxings greatest entertainer, and we as fans will prob never!see the likes of a fighter to even resemble the man they called “THE PRINCE”.

    Make a comeback Naz!

    P.S. That style was not intended for making a fool out of his opponent.Hamed has been fighting with that style since he was 12.I have amature footage of Naz when he was fighting as a kid,its sick,he’s doing those exact same moves he did as a pro.

  • tboneNYC says:

    Let me start by saying that Hamed grew on me rather quickly when i first took wind to him back in the mid 90’s.
    His ring entrances were the best and his style to me was nothing we as fight fans have ever seen before.But that style that Naz had was a style that fed off of his athleticism pure and simple.
    Naz had realy big legs for his size,prob were he got that sick punching power he showed night after night.That style of fighting that Naz had was a style that only a fighter with that much athletic ability could showcase.But when a fighter relizes on using athletic ability and no fundamentals what so ever, its hard for that fighter to have that longevity that a classic style hands up boxer would have in the sport.
    The same goes for super Roy.The man used his pure athletic ability when he got in the ring.These types of fighters if they are going to stay in the sport for any length of time have to either adjust there fighting styles or retire or get beat by a class A fighter like Barrera, because there body’s are incapable of doing the things they did in the ring when they were younger.
    As the article states,Naz was in his early 20’s when his skills seem to diminish,thus being a product of his super athletic style.
    When Roy fought Calzaghe he tried to do alot of the stuff he did earlier in his career and as we all saw,his body did not have those reflexes to accomodate that athletic style of fighting(super fast leaping lead left hook)one of the punches that Roy would throw and catch the chin of his opponent 99.9% of the time.That Roy is long gone.
    I seen Naz in an interview a few months back and he looked like another man.There are rumors of a Hamed comeback, but from what i saw,i hope he started training a long time ago.

  • 786 says:

    naz was legend and would have destroyed most featherweights in his PRIME trust me, it’s just sad that he got a bit too cockey and stopped training properly but that was part of the package!

  • Rahil says:

    Prince naseem is awesome, hes my favourite fighter of all time, he brought a whole new audience to boxing with his antics and every boxing fan should respect what he achieved as a pro boxer. Naseem hamed was good enough to beat barrera but he seemed to have lost love for the sport and didnt box like he normally didwhen he fought towards the end of his career. Nevertheless the prince is simply one of the greatest british champions

  • Owen KO Rowe says:

    Fantastic article. More like this please.

    Naz was a fave of mine. When I was growing up it was him and Jones Jr that made me fall in love with the sport.

    Leaving the Ingles coupled with his ‘I cant be beaten attitude’ took away from him true, global respect. He should have gone on to have huge big money fights against people like Morales, Junior Jones and maybe a young Pacman but I’m not sure on that one.

    He should forever be remembered as one of the best entertainers the sport has seen but in myopinion, a bit of a waste.

  • Wayne Lord says:

    Naseem was no Prince….he was a king! He had so much skill and confidence and it showed in each fight. What amazed me was how quickly he could hit with concussive power, after making someone miss by inches. What impresed me more is the fact that he could also deliver his mule kick punch as he was retreating. Note this “mule kick” was not a big swing like George Foreman.
    The King could deliver that KO punch suddenly, against the run of action, with surgeon like precision and with the littlest of ease. There are many KO punchers but very few fighters can do it like I have just described. Robinson, Super Roy and Hamed are three of the best in delivering that type of short power punch.
    He was a breath of fresh air and made you want to watch him fight. He was not the most elegant and graceful fighter at all times but he was a speed demon. Like we all know, speed kills. Hamed used this with incredible angles and some of the most creative, yet unorthodox moves. He complemented it all with that one shot KO power.
    I had read before the Barrera fight that he was not supposed to fight anymore but he wanted very badly to cement his legacy with that win. I have no idea if that was actually true but he did not look like his usual self. In today’s vernacular, apologists would be saying he was a shot fighter.

    Look Paul Williams came right back and destroyed Quintana after looking terrible in the first “shot” fight! He came right back and nearly killed him. Sometimes a fighter can have a wrong game plan or just not be mentally right for a big fight. It should not happen, but it does. Some fighters like Louis vs Schmeling 1 learn from it and become great and even destroy their nemesis in a return bout whenevr it happens.
    I wanted Prince to avnge that loss. But the fact that he did not seek never a rematch and retired, may be proof that something was wrong. It may have been like Tyson, the huge bank account took away the hunger and desire to train. Or in his case, the transformation from an awkward but very great defensive genius to a bang them out first brawler, had taken its toll.
    Whatever it was we may never truly know. What I know is that he was extremely talented and IMO was the top draw for a few years. Had he beaten Barerra he would have ben the cash cow for many years. He would have been called out by everyone who wanted a big $ day.
    This is what we see now with Manny and will be the same with whomever replace him when he gets old. I still think he retired too young but I am happy to see he stayed that way. Please, do not make any comebacks and tarnish your legacy. You are for sure a future HOF. Great article and thanks for bringing back sweet memories.

  • Oragon na British says:

    Hamed against Morales? He’ll try to learn some Mexican boxing lessons he never ever seen from the British boxing styles…

    Hamed against Pacquiao? He’ll suffer from punches strong enough to put a Sahara Camel to sleep.

    Hamed against JMM? His flamboyance will be against a too good counter-puncher; he’ll never score a round against JMM.

    Hamed against Valero? He’ll never recover from a Venezuelan knockdown.

    But I think Hamed will be brilliant against Barry McKiggan & John Thackston. He’ll definitely a legend after this fight.

  • blavo says:

    Great article,

    Naseem is a legend , a great we will all remember him , wont be another like him.

    if he trained with ingle , and stuck by him he would have beaten barrera , and then morales , he wanted them fights before but they never came to the table.

  • Ben says:

    Prince is one of my all time heros. Im from the same city and trained at the ingle gym at wincobank.

    He has always been a great inspiration to me. His confidence was unbreakable, he was entertaining, skilled, funny, and most importantly got the job done.

    But in the end he destroyed himself by ending his relationship with the people who made him what he was (the ingles). Ingle said after the fall out “hes got 4 more fights, then hes finished” and sure as hell… 4 fights later he was out of love with the sport and lost to barrera on points.

    His actions also cost him most of his friends in his home town. Now hes overweight, still cocky… and has come out of jail in the past few years after he crashed his sports car almost killing a man.

    I would love to see hamed come back to the sport. Just get in shape prince! Come back to the gym, help train people, help inspire them. We all know your success has inspired the latest generation of sheffield fighters… (junior witter, kell brook, steve barnes). Aswell as fighters around the world, for example pauli mallinagi.

    Your a king! Thank you for the childhood memories.

  • Anthony says:

    Great article. I grew up watching the Prince, mostly staying up late to see 1 or 2 round knockouts, but i loved it. We will never see another boxer like him in our life time.
    I still honestly believe that the Prince would have beaten anyone if he stuck with Ingle. They seemed to have a great relationship, after they split I think this was when his loss of love for the sport became apparant.
    A fully fit and hungry Prince, I believe, would have beaten Barrera that night. Not so sure if he could KO Barrera.
    Hopefully Princed Naseem will get the recognition he deserves, like the writer of this article has shown, and at some point be awarded his place in the Hall of Fame.

  • Ukansodoff says:

    Naseem Hamed is one of my all time faves. Him and Nigel Benn were the most entertaining and exciting fighters on UK telly when i was growing to love the sport.

    I always saw Hamed as a possible all time great, he had the skills, talent and power to take him to legendry status.

    What he didnt have was the discapline to box for points, he wanted to KO everybody and went out to KO everybody. He never really boxed his way through rounds sensibly to win the round on points.

    So when somebody as good as Barrera came along and stopped him landing the big shots Hamed didnt have the answer to start boxing his way to a points win.

    If he had learnt and used that part of the sport i think hed of been unbeatable.

  • wellsini says:

    Brilliant article. Prince Naz was a true great.

  • Steve M says:

    Great article , I believe Hamed’s downfall began when the level of influence on his career transferred from the Ingle camp to his family , this coincided with the change in style from elusive boxer puncher to pot shotting brawler.

  • Ukansodoff says:

    Prince Naseem Hamed is there with Nigel Benn as my 2 favourite boxers ever. Skilled, talented, cocky, hard, ENTERTAINING and born champions.

    The one thing Naseem Hamed was missing was discapline, he never boxed a round in his life to win that round on points, he went out to KO the other guy simple as that.

    So when he couldnt knock out a massivly smart and discaplined Barrera he was losing the rounds being outboxed.

    Im sure if hed of had the discapline to box more we could of seen one of the greatest world champions the world has ever seen. Though some argue that in his peak he was that already

    he certainly had everything else needed to become one.

  • jameso says:

    I agree very well written article and on a good topic too. Personally Hamed is one of my favourite boxers ever. Whatever his weaknesses were i think the apparant ease he cut through his opponents has not been mirrored anywhere else since. More on this website by Stephen Pink, less by Perez

  • Andy C says:

    Great article. Manuel Perez should take some notes from this one.

  • Boxing Fan says:

    Which would you rather bet your money to:

    1) Hamed as a featherweight

    2) Paquiao as a featherweight

    3) Barrera as a featherweight

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!