Comments on: Froch may Regret Fighting in the Super Tourney

By: ron u.k.

ron u.k. — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:39:01 +0000

So if Froch stayed at home fighting low key opposition as you suggest you wouldn’t slaughter him right? So now he’s taking part in this tourney against the divisions best you suggest he should have stayed at home!
Plus all of those fighters would have beaten Calzaghe!! You are priceless.

By: Chris H

Chris H — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:45:50 +0000

Class only gets you so far. Power, heart and durability are what clinch it. Sound like anyone you know…..

By: Chris H

Chris H — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:41:11 +0000

He’s just miserable cos his mother takes it in the ass….from a Brit

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:22:02 +0000

LFMAO Calzaghe in trouble? Your a clown! The only trouble joe would have might be kessler but he has already beaten him.

By: Danno

Danno — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:28:16 +0000

I don’t know who’s the worse mug.
This Scott fellow for writing this or me having spent the time to read the crap. Annoyed as i am, i want to tell you that, i believe Froch to be a very hard fighter. When watching him against Taylor i wondered how anyone could not think hes terrible defensibly,and utterly beatable.
But, and its a biggun, carl’s a very hard guy, an English streetfighter type, and i’d bet my house on him doing us proud again, whoever the opponent.
After all,you can be the fastest classiest boxer in the world and do great, untill a true fighter comes along and knocks you out. UNNERVING is the word i think i’ve been looking for to describe him.

By: has been

has been — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:25:59 +0000

Boxing is still prize fighting and no real fighter ever regrets having fought another good fighter and made a nice fat purse.

By: Scot Gilfoid

Scot Gilfoid — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:29:26 +0000

I hate Britain, Froch cant beat anyone, calzaghe had a terrible record and would lose to any american including me, i am a virgin

By: johno

johno — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:35:39 +0000

Come on Scotty, your British really

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:34:14 +0000

some quick facts from the next ted atlas Scott Gilford

1. Lacy would beat calzahge in a rematch

2. Laszcano was robbed in his fight with Hatton

3. Hopkins suddenly grew ten years younger in between the Calzaghe and Pavlik fights meaning pavlik would obviously beat Calzaghe

ok i lied about the 3rd one (he did however say pavlik would beat Calzaghe)
but honest to god he said the first 2.

By: adam

adam — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:45:52 +0000

you have to be the worst boxing writer in the world,without a dout you know nothing at all.
apart from kessler and AA he would wipe the floor with the rest FACT. wake up who ever runs this site because this man is a compleat muppet and giving the site a bad rep

By: johno

johno — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:08:21 +0000

Another unbiased pro British article from the man in the know Scotty not. lol

By: Dave H

Dave H — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:22:41 +0000

Word is now the Froch v Bute fight has fallen through, Froch is seeking a fight with Dirrell which will take place within the next three months.

By: mark f

mark f — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:09:44 +0000

Abraham KO Froch, grow up did u see AA’s last but one fight (cant remember his name but it was a lacklustre 12 rounder). I honestly believe that AA and Pavlik are as bad as eachother for avoiding oneanother but if push came to shove Pavlik would win.
As for Ward, this has Froch Ko all over it and if he boxes the way he did against Pascal in the middle rounds he can beat Kessler on points, as his speed is nothing like Taylors

By: hack writer

hack writer — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:15:55 +0000

Froch may have balls…..the balls to get KO’d by Ward, Kessler, and Abraham. Outpointed by Dirrell and a better conditioned Taylor.

By: David

David — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:27:51 +0000

these are all blown up middles apart from kessler and frosh they should put in dawson and hopkins it would be better