Comments on: Hatton-Pacquiao: The Better Man Didn’t Win

By: A message to the writer...

A message to the writer... — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:50:28 +0000

Thousands of readers are flocking to your article just to see you in denial… I don’t know if you realize that but we’re all having a good laugh at you hahaha.

By: bulokinkotumbongmo

bulokinkotumbongmo — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:08:56 +0000

Hey Manuel Perez, if you believed with your talent as a writer why dont you put some money on cotto, and let see who will be crying after the fight on Nov. 14, 2009…..

By: Manuel Perez

Manuel Perez — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:21:35 +0000

Sorry guys. i loss bigtime!

By: George D

George D — Sun, 17 May 2009 20:22:08 +0000

Even if Pacquiao will give Hatton a rematch for ten times the result will be the same over and over.Hatton might even end up being KO’d three times in the first round.Pacquiao is simply too fast,too skilled,too class for Hatton.Still my hat off to Hatton.You’re a brave fighter mate!!!

By: LMNO

LMNO — Fri, 08 May 2009 04:09:14 +0000

“I think this article makes at least one valid point – that the jury should still be out on the pacman.”

After the ODLH fight I realized that no matter who Pacquiao defeats there will always be DOUBTERS / HATERS.

So that’s a PACQUIAO Haters excuse for the ODLH and HATTON fight, “De La Hoya was barely recognizable and weakened from weight loss and Hatton fought the dumbest fight of his career and was obviously over confident.”

EXCUSES are for PANSIES! Polly go jump in the ferry boat with M. PEREZ! SPARTANS rise up!

By: Polly

Polly — Fri, 08 May 2009 02:23:58 +0000

I think this article makes at least one valid point – that the jury should still be out on the pacman. His wins over De La Hoya and now Hatton were more spectacular for the names than what actually happened in the ring. De La Hoya was barely recognizable and weakened from weight loss and Hatton fought the dumbest fight of his career and was obviously over confident – speaking openly of a rematch with Mayweather before he even climbed in the ring with Pacquiao.

By: jaggernaut

jaggernaut — Thu, 07 May 2009 04:43:31 +0000

hatton’s 1st mistake.. accepted a fight with manny
2nd mistake.. he showed up in las vegas to fight manny
honstly, manny is just too good a boxer vs ricky. rick is good, manny is better…and he’s the best right now.

By: Alexandr Hermann

Alexandr Hermann — Thu, 07 May 2009 04:42:48 +0000

Perhaps, the author doesn’t know that boxing is not only won by strength and power. He should know that each human being has the PHYSICAL, COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL functions. I still believe that Manny Pacquiao is ahead on all the three human functions, hence, the fight was so easy for him. The Team or the Coaching Staff is also a very relevant variable contributing to his win.

By: stellar27

stellar27 — Thu, 07 May 2009 03:54:12 +0000

you cannot teach an old british bulldog a new trick…in boxing there is a essentail thing called gameplan ricky did not have any for pacquiao he vocally said he will be more stronger and bigger for manny but he ever said that he is much wiser to manny? none… he was been fooled by Floyd joy whatever, who belittle the team pacquiao…Rematch will be no problem bring it on! but believe me it will end the same faith and it will take alot of toll to ricky and maybe endangered his health…

By: boxingguru

boxingguru — Thu, 07 May 2009 03:03:31 +0000

Manuel Perez, Are you serious? Hatton almost got killed and he’s still better the better of the two. You definetely need help..SERIOUSLY!!!!

By: Weiss

Weiss — Thu, 07 May 2009 03:01:59 +0000

Well after reading the article, I must agree that Mr/Ms Perez does have some point. But based on your previous articles, I do believe that you just hate MP, maybe coz he beat up Mexican fighters, or maybe coz you lost BIG money by betting against him :p

I’m starting to wonder just how many more great fighters must MP beat to get your approval. Or would you just give excuses everytime he wins. Maybe if he beats Mayweather or JMM again would shut your trap and accept that MP is indeed the best.

By: Pacboy

Pacboy — Thu, 07 May 2009 02:58:00 +0000

Gabriel Perez…. You are so wrong!!!

The reason Hatton was victim to KO of the year for having his guard down and Manny’s power is not because he used wrong tactics… BUt because he was weight drained and dehydrated!!!

The truth hurts and it hit you as hard as Manny hit Pacquiao…

By: aaron

aaron — Thu, 07 May 2009 02:41:23 +0000

you just can’t accept that your favorite fighter lost.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 07 May 2009 02:27:28 +0000

Excuses, Excuses, Ricky was destroyed by a better fighter. If this, that, yeah right excuses!

By: yosh

yosh — Thu, 07 May 2009 00:43:28 +0000

pacman is too great , even how gud hatton was, there is no chance hatton beat pacquiao. pacquiao was so great and even hatton figt differrnt way i mean not brawl fight and dirty tactics(how would u say that hatton is better man with his dirty tactics the better man is always not cheating) . if he change his style not brawl , oh men i thnk its going to one round stopage coz pacquiao love not brawl fight. paquiao love to slug with a distance, the fight in may 2 is hatton world style and not even touch pacquaio ,