Pavlik-Rubio: Kelly Looking To Resurrect His Career
By Matt Stein: Middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik has a lot to prove on February 21st against Marco Antonio Rubio, starting with whether Pavlik has moved beyond his last fight – an embarrassing one-sided loss to Bernard Hopkins on October 18th, 2008. Nothing was lost in the fight in terms of titles for Pavlik, aside from his hurt feelings and some of his credibility as a fighter.
You can’t put aside how badly Pavlik was beaten in that fight and try to ignore it, because it shows that there are some major problems with Pavlik’s style that will likely be exposed in the future when he fights someone with good movement and skills like Hopkins.
Rubio, 28, could be the fighter to do this. However, he’s never been much of a mover in the past, but you can expect him to be trying his hardest to imitate the style of Hopkins. For certain, Rubio isn’t going to try and match Pavlik with power shots. Rubio is smart enough to understand that he probably can’t win that way, even though he has good power and a high knockout percentage of his own.
Pavlik’s lack of hand speed was an issue against Hopkins, but it won’t be nearly as much a factor against Rubio, who is about as fast as Pavlik in hand speed. This is a good thing for Pavlik, because he wasn’t able to get his shots in on time against Hopkins because Bernard was making a good effort in being first with his punches, landing well ahead of Pavlik.
When the two were close, Hopkins was able to land more shots with shot flurries, further beating the slower Pavlik to the punch. Pavlik will be evenly matched in this fight, but he’s going to have to develop some other strategies to use in the future when he faces a middleweight with speed and movement like Hopkins. Cutting off the ring is one thing that Pavlik could do well if he learned to do it better. He a poor job against Hopkins, who was able to roam freely around the ring without being forced to trade shots.
With Rubio, he should be easier to catch up to because he fights much more flat-footed than Hopkins and should be less of a problem in tracking down. To the extent that Rubio can stay on the move and away from serious exchanges with Pavlik, he improves his chances of winning.
It’ll take a good jab and constant movement, though. The minute that Rubio lapses back into his old style of fighting for any length of time and letting Pavlik stand in front of him, he’ll be in grave danger from Kelly’s big power punches.
please use above banner to link back to us!
i agree mark, the only fight calzaghe and hopkins should be thinking about is each other not young up and comers like pavlik and dawson, both should have their last against one another and sort out the unfinished business
Its a matter of opinion, both are guaranteed to be hall of famers. Its an insult to legends like this that the writers on here are comparing them unfavourably to and accusing them of ducking the likes of Pavlik and Dawson who have yet to build their legacies.
Far better than jc, een tho calzaghe is undefeated, altho i think he should have been beaten by hopkins, if he doesn’et prove me any millions of other ppl wrong by facing hopkins again then no doubt hopkins will be a far greater legend than calzaghe ever was, oh and i’m british btw b4 you start sayin its bias its just fact
MARK E I AGREE WITH YOU MAN
This article speaks highly of Hopkins whom was and still is an outstanding boxer, but as soon as JC’s name is thrown in the mix BH turns into a shot fighter who can no longer deliver
Hopkins is world class as is JC
And if Dawson was to fight Hopkins before Calzaghe and lose, all would be quiet.
Imagine what would have happened if he’d fought Calzaghe when all the americans were accusing Calazaghe of ducking him. All gone quiet on that front hasn’t it…… Now its moved on to Dawson.
i agree also! losing to hopkins isnt a embarrassment. had it been an unknown guy, bit like rubio, then maybe it is a little. pavlik win via KO im expecting.
Totally agree ukansodoff! getting dominated and beatin by hopkins is no embarrasment, just ask tito trinidad
You know i think embarresing defeat seems a little harsh.
it was a resounding defeat against a world class opponant at a weight he had never tried before.
until that night he had worked at dominating his natural weight division. if hed been hammered at that weight then yes embarresing but it wasnt.