And us brits are getting excited by it, but who wouldnt.

But i dont agree that hes a coward, ive seen nothing ever in Haye to put that on him. And hes had 2 fights at this weight and won them both extremely impressivly, id say he needs to be seen as a full heavy with plenty to offer.

To me Barrett looked quicker than Klitcsko when they fought, and Haye made him look super slow and it was his pace that allowed him to unleash the power and that pace will be even more noticable against either brother.

Also id say alot of brits aint convinced Haye could beat either brother, we do however think hes got a better chance than alot of boxers people rate better than him.

I also have no problems with the 2 Ukranians. They have been the only real stand out boxers since the likes of Lewis and Tyson retired.

But we crave excitment and they dont give that to us. Most the blame can be on the style of thier opponants which is why people are happy to have Haye arrive on the scene.

Win or lose there is somebody out there now who is not coming into the ring as a fat man with a punchers chance who works like hes in slow motion. Hes fast and is guna throw bombs and still have his punchers chance. Surely thats what we want over the likes of Peters who was a joke in the last title fight.

I have been reading all your comments mate and you have made some cracking points over the last couple of days

yes, the klitschko’s have performed very well in the heavyweight division over the years (they are world champs after all). however, you can’t deny that wlad has over the last couple of years turned into a dull, over-defensive and lame fighter. vital on the other hand is a bit more interesting, but has only just came back from a long lay-off and is very injury prone, so unless he gets some more fights under his belt then i doubt he would be able to beat haye (this is as long as haye can get his own stamina problems shorted out and sustain a high-pressure performance lasting at least eight rounds against him).

on your point about if the klitschko’s were british we would be praising them as if they were gods or something like that, i seriously doubt it. in my opinon wlad is as interesting as danny williams on a good night, so any chance of praise would be at a minimum.

now on haye. you mention that he runs his mouth off and is very ignorant. 2bf, i agree with this (although i would say he is arrogant, not ignorant). but he has so far backed his words up with actions (three world titles in 21 fights says it all) and if this is such a bad thing, do you also have the same view on mayweather jr?
yes he fought a relativley poor fighter in barrett, but he was a good opponent to help him bed in to the division and has mixed it up with good opposistion in the past. i also don’t think haye was “bragging” about who he had beaten after the fight, in fact he gave respect to him for fighting him, but was “bragging” about the nature of the way he beat him. but how you can say he has done nothing? three world titles in 21 fights is great at the least and he has never backed down from a challange. and i think what ukansodoff meant when he mentioned haye being a breath of fresh air was that it is nice to see a fighter who has ambition, a desire, an exciting style of fighting and a good pedigree to back it up looking to challange for a heavyweight title.