Kessler Beats Hopkins, No Doubt About It

kessler4526.jpgBy Chris Williams: I think we saw the fighter that can ultimately put Bernard Hopkins out of his misery last Saturday night when super middleweight Mikkel Kessler (41-1, 31 KOs) destroyed Danilo Haussler in a 3rd round TKO in Oldenburg, Germany. This wouldn’t a case of Hopkins picking on a middleweight fighter like Kelly Pavlik, who at the end of the day, was just too small for the light heavyweight Hopkins. Kessler has the size at 168, the boxing skills, the movement and the speed to easily handle Hopkins and retire him from the sport.

As good as Kessler looked, I doubt that Hopkins will want to take the hook and seek out a fight with him. Hopkins wants a fight with Joe Calzaghe or Roy Jones Jr., either of which would bring in much more money without all the risk that Kessler would bring to the table. I realize that Kessler has been beaten by Calzaghe, but the fight was very close and in a rematch, I’m fairly certain he would beat him. That’s why Calzaghe probably doesn’t want to face him again. As far as Kessler-Hopkins, I don’t see any reason why this fight can’t place.

Kessler would probably agree to fight Hopkins at 175 any day of the weak, because it would mean that he would only have to put on a couple of pounds to make the fight. Realistically, Kessler wouldn’t have to gain a pound and he would still be big enough, quick enough and skilled enough to beat him. Ultimately, Hopkins may have no other option but to face Kessler, because Calzaghe has no interest whatsoever in going over old ground and beating Hopkins one more time, and Roy Jones Jr. won’t be in the position to fight Hopkins after he loses badly to Calzaghe on November 8th.

That leaves only Chad Dawson and Kessler as potential opponents for Hopkins. I don’t see Hopkins having any interest in facing Pavlik again, because he would probably do much worse the next time out, and maybe lose to him. Other top fighters in the super middleweight and light heavyweight division, like Carl Froch, Jean Pascal, Denis Inkin, Lucian Bute, Hugo Garay, Zsolt Erdei and Adrian Diaconu, don’t have a big enough name for Hopkins to waste time fighting.

Hopkins is too small to move up to cruiserweight, so that’s out as well. In the end, Hopkins may have no choice but to fight Kessler if he wants to stay busy. I think Hopkins may have ruined his chances with a second fight with Calzaghe by burning his bridges by going to the last degree with his gamesmanship while trying to promote the fight. Calzaghe probably doesn’t have much interest in a repeat of that whole ordeal, even it does mean a huge payday at the end of the day.

Hopkins did look good in his last fight, I give him that, but that’s only because Pavlik did a poor job putting pressure on him and cutting off the ring. Kessler’s jab would be a major factor in the fight, as he would keep it in Hopkins’ face the whole time. Hopkins previously had problems in his fight with Jermain Taylor mainly because of Jermain’s jabs and speedy combinations. Kessler would bring the same thing to the table against Hopkins, but adding much more versatility when it comes to offensive firepower.

I think this would be a fight that the sneaky Hopkins couldn’t think his way through, trying to devise alternative strategies to beat Kessler. Believe me, Kessler would have a plan B, C, D, E and F, and would quickly work through each one until he found one that worked against the older Hopkins.

16 Responses to “Kessler Beats Hopkins, No Doubt About It”

  • sammy says:

    you rekon they would beat kessler you must be jokeing hahaha kesseler is a great fighter i think he is going to be the next big thing trust me hop ha dont make me lath kesseler would knock him out in 3 easley and dawson he is rubish he would knock him out in 2 and pavlik he just ant in the same leage morons you will see

  • amagerfc says:

    Well,,as Dane I must say this:
    If Kessler was to meet Calzaghe 10 times…….he would loose 10 times!
    Calzaghe is far to superior and to agressive for Kessler to handle.
    Saying that………..Kessler is second best out there. He would outpoint B.Hopkins,
    KO Pavlik, KO Abraham, KO Taylor………
    But against Calzaghe??
    None of above would ever win over him.
    Calzaghe is so so underated. People just do not seem to se how superior he is.

  • Andy says:

    Bhop is far better than this writer suggests and Calzaghe is still too slick for Kessler.
    Kessler is a superb and exciting fighter but Bhop is an expert at not getting hit. Who has ever beat him up? Not even a prime RJJ looked good against him. Give him credit for that,.. although the writer doesnt seem to understand just how good Bhop is. Pavlik has very good power and although he was punching above his weight and he only hit Bhop a few times, Bhops face was still swollen after the fight. Bhop simply out-classed him.
    Kessler too was out-hustled by Calzaghe because Calzaghe is extremely difficult to fight because of his unorthodox incredibly quick, quirky and fast paced style. As Bhop found out.
    As for Kesslers jab, it is good but it has to be backed up by footwork. Bhop knows the ‘science’ of fighting to such a degree its like a chess match to him. He is an amazing athlete.
    All said and done, Kessler is one of my favourite fighters because he is a true warrior and always brings excitement, he’s just not good enough to beat peeps like Bhop and Calzaghe.

  • Stuart says:

    I realize that Kessler has been beaten by Calzaghe, but the fight was very close and in a rematch, I’m fairly certain he would beat him. – Calzaghe destroyed Kessler you moron! Why would he fight him again as he nears retirement?

  • Boxing Professor says:

    Kessler you better watch out for the winner of the Lacy vs. Tayor fight and I’m pretty sure they’re coming for you.

  • dwayne says:

    what did b hop & calzaghe do to the boxing writers? politics doesnt belong in sports. calzaghe will beat kessler every time! but pavlik vs. kessler or pavlik vs abraham would be an exciting fight! push that!

  • Jordan says:

    What is everyones problem with Joe Calzaghe?! He was awesome against Kessler in the altter rounds, trounced Hopkins after a poor 4 rounds, but showed what a true world champion he is by climbing off the deck and out boxing him. Lacy was anhilitaed, and Jones will be made to look like a muppet come next month. Longest reigning champion of modern times, unbeaten in 45, Held all of the belts….so tell me, how can this man have gone on for so long if he is a fraud?!

  • Ben says:

    Calzaghe would beat Kessler in the rematch…this fool never saw the fight obviously, but Kessler won’t fight Hopkins because why should he? Kessler is too hungry, powerful, sharp and not well known enough.
    Hopkins would lie and say Kessler isn’t even in the same legue as Pavlik just because his American…even though it is a lie.
    I’d pick Kessler to KO Pavlik and always have done. B-Hop vs Kessler is 50/50 and a great way for either one of them to earn a rematch with Calzaghe…but Hopkins won’t do it.

  • Velvet Rope says:

    I for one would like to see Kessler Hopkins, but don’t think Kessler has the pulling power to make this fight financial attractive to Hopkins. Kessler seems a robust fighter, but if you are comparing their respective efforts against Calzaghe, combined with the Pavlik shut-out, you’d have to favour Hopkins. That said, Kessler is strong and skilled enough not to make it a mis-match and an interesting one for the boxing fan, but I fear there would not be enough main-stream interest.

  • keil says:

    Why do some people write such reports, its totally ludicrous to even think such a thing? Not sure what fight you were watching but calzaghe convingingley won the fight from 6 to 12 and would have floored kessler in the 8th if it weren’t for the ref.
    Second point why would calzaghe not win the rematch? I’m sure calzaghe has continued to step up a division and successfully maintain his unbeaten record. Furthermore, Kessler has only fought bums since his defeat. In all due respect Kessler is very good fighter and a match with Hopkins would be very spectacular but stop getting confused in life. No doubt during this credit crunch you’re the only person in the world that has a money tree in their back gardens.

  • A - Force says:

    Bias yanks

  • pikemc says:

    Calzaghe kessler was not a close fight, calzaghe would not lose a rematch, and even if he did win the rematch, this site would probably claim that kessler lost because he was abducted by aliens the night before

  • ding a ling man says:

    What Kessler would fight B-Hop like he fought Miranda. BS in 40 odd fights his only notable fights is Calzaghe, andrade and Beyer.

  • Steve says:

    Dont agree with you assessment of Calzaghe-Kessler. Joe had far superior hand speed and would win every time until his speed deserts him. Kessler admitted that himself. Also Calzaghe would have knocked out Mikkel if the ref hadnt jumped in after a stunning body shot by Joe.

  • pko says:

    This sounds like a Hopkins hater here. Everybody was hyping Pavlik up before the fight, including Kelly himself. Now that BHop schooled him the excuses are plentiful. Kelly got his ass handed to him period! BHop is 43, wants to avenge one of his losses against Joe or Roy, why shouldn’t he? He’s looking to retire so let the “new” champs fight each other.

  • dan says:

    Would be a good fight i rekon,i think kessler would beat hopkins but u never know with b-hop.

Leave a Reply

Links
Search


Boxing Forum
Ads
Link To Us
please use above banner to link back to us!