Chad Dawson – The Name on Nobody’s Lips
By Cinquez: “Bad” Chad Dawson, the current IBO and IBF light-heavyweight champion, is arguably one of the most exciting fighters in any division at the moment. His dismantling of former champion Antonio Tarver was as compelling as it was a significant step in the development of a man who, at just 26, has many years left in boxing. Yet all the big names are reluctant to fight him. Jones Jr., Calzaghe, Hopkins, Kessler and Pavlik have all either been silent on the issue are said outright they have no desire to fight him.
With 27 victories and no defeats, this man lays claim to two of the most distinguished belts in boxing, at a time when there are still great fighters available to fight. Hopkins, Calzaghe and Jones Jr. only appear interested in fighting each other, and perhaps there is a significant reason as to why.
At 36, Calzaghe has indeed had to wait a long time to be given recognition of his boxing ability. His performance against Hopkins was supposed to cement his place against the greats and yet it appeared to leave far more questions than answers. Victories over Jeff Lacy, Mikkel Kessler and a highly disputed victory over ”The executioner” do not qualify someone into the hall of fame. ”Stay at home Joe” earned his name for a reason, and whilst Calzaghe could rightly argue he shouldn’t have to leave Wales as the title Champion to defend his title, his lack of significant fights from 1997 (When he defeated Chris Eubank for the WBO title) right through to his fight against Bernard Hopkins could yet come back to haunt him. So perhaps he, more than RJJ or Hopkins, should want to fight a credible opponent in Dawson to be truly recognized amongst the boxing greats. A win over Roy Jones proves nothing; his star was truly dimmed with his brutal defeats four years ago, and his lackluster performances since.
Roy Jones Junior, more than Hopkins and Calzaghe, will have no desire to fight Dawson. Jones Jr., so emphatically knocked out by both Tarver and Glen Johnson (Neither recognized for their knockout power) has led him to take on smaller fighter since then, and the four years since those defeats certainly will not have helped to maintain his one true asset; his athleticism. His victory over Felix Trinidad, though comprehensive, proved very little when reminded that Trinidad was natural at welterweight, and at best a middleweight. Fighting Dawson, a man who systematically defeated a man (Tarver) whose knockout and subsequent rematch victory over Jones Jr. would be a true redemption fight for Jones Jnr. But, most likely a fight he would lose.
The third man in the equation is Bernard Hopkins, and his open rejection of the fight, also pours scorn onto his claim that he is looking at ”bigger and better things”. Hopkins ”loss” to Calzaghe did not suggest he should retire, but the fight against Kelly Pavlik was one that I felt Hopkins should win. His losses against Jermain Taylor I felt had been somewhat dubious, and Kelly Pavlik’s one dimensional style was indeed perfect for the Hopkins, whose versatility and unconventional style was a perfect match for the slightly crude style of Pavlik. His victory however, highlighted his superiority over the current king of his former division, one he didn’t abdicate but lost in a palace coup d’état. So why not then, given Calzaghe rejection of a rematch with him, take on the current Light Heavyweight star?
At 36, 39, and 43 respectively, the Calzaghe, Jones Jr. and Hopkins all have one thing in common, their shared status as boxing veterans. Do they still have the desire to prove themselves against fighters who are young ambitious and most importantly, have a very good chance of victory? Other than Manny Pacquiao and Miguel Cotto (His recent fight loss to Antonio Margarito), there appear very few fighters willing to take on fighters who are on an equal footing with them. Watch this space boxing fans…
please use above banner to link back to us!
Oh well, my colleagues have introduced an Designer Belt online store. They said that price and quality are very good. Can you give me more suggestions?
i know for a fact.. that chad dawson will beat anybody that comes his way..chad this is your boy from highvile they talkin like they stupid..
He lost that fight against Glen Johnson, I was not impressed by him at all.
I dont think Calzaghe will lose. However, i dont think either fighter will beat Dawson. would be an interesting match-up though. Hopkins should now retire with his pride intact.
The winner of the Joe Calzaghe vs. Roy Jones jr will be Roy jones and if B-Hop want some Roy will serve him too.Roy Jones jr. best pound4pound in the lt.Heavy weight divison. Roy is going to beat Joe and hand joe his 1st loss and if Chad Dawson want some he can get it to.Roy is going to get all the Belts again. Roy is BACK ya’ll.
DAWSON S A MINT FIGHTER BUT HE WILL LOSE TO CALZAGHE MAYBE HOPKINS AND WILL LOSE TO ROY JONES HE WILL WIN PAVLIK AND THEM BETTER OFF FIGHTING THE TOP 10.
Dawson is a good fighter but he has to go and get some top fights.B-Hop, Roy jones, and super joe are top name fighters. Dawson vs. Kessler would be a good fight at a catchweight of 170.Nontitle fight.
Good article, think it’s true Dawson derserves to be in the mix with RJJ, B-Hop and Calzaghe, but his issue, is not being a big enough name to make the $$$ that these three would be looking for. Faces the same problem as Kessler really (recognising Kessler did fight JC, but that was the 168lb undisputed, plus a 50,000 gate help bank-roll it). Secondly, why is Tyson ranting about Calzaghe and skin-colour in the previous postings? Rage issues, I fear.
Dawson would smash them all
tyson18
Im glad someone said it. If calzaghe was black this would have been mentioned a long time ago. Just as Marciano’s era included no black boxers, its hard to look at Calzaghe’s career when he has fought nobody of distinction other than an aged Eubanks and Hopkins (who he either drew with or lost). To put it in perspective, 45-0 does not always tell the same story and the record of Lennox Lewis, Barrera, Margarito, De La Hoya, Chavez, Hopkins, Nelson, Mosley, Holyfield and the rest will all be better because even though all have lost they at least fought great fighters. ”Stay at home Joe” for a reason. Nothing to do with him being from Britain. Eubanks,Benn,Lewis are all British. But their records in terms of opposition cannot be compared to Joe Calzaghe. He has a legacy of nobody’s and over the hills. Roy Jones Junior was DESTROYED by Tarver and Johnson over 4 years ago!! Since then he has lost his speed, and his heart. What qualifies this to be a legacy cementing fight? Its a joke, and because of that he has gone down in my estimation somewhat. It would have been more credible to fight Hopkins again than take this option……
To be honest, the this question is not one to even think about. Dawson would beat most of these guys, but then he looked suspect against Glen Johnson. So you never know that is the main point
Brilliant article, i for one have long thought this about many of the leading lights. The unfortunate truth is that the $ counts, and as long as there are easier fights available for more (or equal) pay, then it really is a no-brainer. But it’s part of the reason the UFC are currently crowing. Well highlighted though!