Will Fighting Jones Enhance Calzaghe’s Legacy?




calzaghe4534.jpgBy Aaron Klein: While Joe Calzaghe (45-0, 32 KOs) continues to try and talk up the talent of his opponent Roy Jones Jr., who will supposedly be his last fight of his career on November 8th at New York’s Madison Square Garden, many in the boxing world aren’t so enamored by this fight and see it as merely Calzaghe cashing out of the sport the easy way in order to avoid more dangerous fighters like Kelly Pavlik or one of his many talented challengers to his WBO super middleweight title. Rather than have to continue to defend his WBO title, Calzaghe yesterday gave it up after 11 years.

It was an incredible length of time to hold a title, to be sure, but unfortunately Calzaghe had few real tests during the entire eleven years as a champion with which to build his legacy. In fact, an argument can be made that out of the entire time that he held the title, he only had a handful of decent opponents to fight - Mikkel Kessler, Jeff Lacy, Robin Reid and Richie Woodhall. Most, however, weren’t the type that would impress the average boxing fan unfortunately. This is one of the reasons why Calzaghe’s recent decision to retire after a final bout against the 39 year-old Jones has been criticized so heavily by many fans and writers alike. Although Calzaghe is saying that Jones is a good opponent, that he can still fight and isn’t shot, it’s hard for many people to fall in line with that belief considering the evidence to the contrary.

Jones hasn’t exactly shined in the past four years, and has lost three out of his last six bouts against good opponents. Because of this, it would seem strange that Calzaghe would choose him rather than an unbeaten Kelly Pavlik, whom he says is unproven despite the fact that Pavlik has already beaten Jermain Taylor twice, Edison Miranda and Calzaghe’s fellow countryman Gary Lockett with ease. From the looks of it, Calzaghe seems to be taking the easy route against the lesser threat of Jones rather than risk his unbeaten record against a dangerous fighter like Pavlik.

In doing so, however, Calzaghe appears to be taking away from his boxing legacy by taking the path of least resistance. While Calzaghe may feel that he’s accomplished a lot during his career by holding onto his WBO title for such a lengthy amount of time, the fact remains that he fought few fighters, from what I can see, that are really worthy of being considered as good opponents. For the most part, you can throw out 95% of all of Calzaghe’s opponents during his run as a WBO champion, and really only come up with his fights with Kessler, Lacy and Reid as his only real live opponents.

As for his non-title fight against Bernard Hopkins last April, that fight did little to enhance Calzaghe’s legacy given the fact that Hopkins was 43 at the time, and he appeared to fight Calzaghe to a standstill. Indeed, the fight probably should have been ruled a draw, with no real clear winner emerging between the two of them. That fight probably did a lot of damage to those who feel that Calzaghe has an impeccable career, because when you factor that fight in with all of the marginal opponents that Calzaghe faced during his career, it would seem to indicate that he was never the real deal as a champion.

This is why it seems likely that Calzaghe will be doing himself no favors should he immediately retire after facing Jones on November 8th. The fight to begin with isn’t particularly appealing, the kind of fight that would increase Calzaghe’s worth as a fighter given Jones’ fading skills. With Pavlik out there as a better choice, that would seem to have been the fighter that Calzaghe should have chosen as his last fight.

If he could care less about his legacy, then fine, I’d say go ahead and take the fight with Jones and then get out of the sport. However, if he’s concerned with finishing his career on a strong note, and trying to add a good name to his resume, Calzaghe really needed to fight Pavlik. I personally think that Calzaghe is wasting his time with fighting Jones, because it does the opposite of what he wants and tends to give ammunition for those who feel that Calzaghe is avoiding Pavlik. Calzaghe probably could have gotten away with it if he had faced better opponents during his career, however, but unfortunately much of the fighters that he fought up until now have been pretty ordinary, the type that many fighters could still be unbeaten if they had fought.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Related articles:

  • No Related Post
Joe Calzaghe, Roy Jones Jr. l 629 views

« Latest Boxing News: Arreola Destroys Garcia


11 Responses to “Will Fighting Jones Enhance Calzaghe’s Legacy?”

  1. Ben Says:

    Calzaghe clearly beat Hopkins…he landed more punches on him than anybody in Hopkins career has in a fight, was against a biased American ref, 3 American judges and a spoiling injury faking ‘Exacutioner’ and still WON!!! Hopkins is no ordinary 43 year old either, he is still in the top 10 P4P list today, and for a good eason too!!! Also Hopkins is the best fighter in the world today at beating up southpaws and still lost to Joe, so lets get real everyone!!!

  2. Alex Cotton Jr Says:

    Maybe 5 years ago yes, but now no way. Thats like
    Oscar Dela Hoya fighting Julio Ceasar Chavez again.

  3. Sam Says:

    This is discusting! Calzaghe had few real tests during the entire eleven years as a champion!!! Get real he’s beat young champs like Lacy the one punch wonder! Then the very good Kessler… Pavlik has not proved himself yet whos he beat? Taylor? Taylor was crap.. Hopkins will kick kellys ass period

    Kellys got a long way to go! Lets see how good he is at 170lb hes never been there before.. Joe and Jones is the best fight for a long time.. You yanks have nothing no money, no fighters and no one likes you anymore

  4. Anonymous Says:

    Calzaghe is avoiding pavlik simple as tht he fought a finished hopkins and hes gna fight a finished jones fight a boxer in his prime joe pavlik wil ko joes granpa had hm on hs back side in the 1st round

  5. ZKO Says:

    Fighting and beating Jones would enhance Calzaghe’s legacy. He’s beaten the defensive genius (Hopkins), the power puncher (Lacy), the tough guy (Kessler) and now he’s going after the all around speed/skills/power guy (Jones). Jones is not in his prime, but Calzaghe at his age probably isn’t as well. It’s a good move for Calzaghe to further solidify his legacy.

  6. Los Angeles Lakers Says:

    Calzaghe’s legacy probably won’t be enhanced by beating a Jones who is
    clearly past his prime but on the other
    hand I don’t think it will matter because Calzaghe’s legacy is secure.

  7. Bob Says:

    How can it be said that calzaghe has only fought inferior opposition. He has always fought his mandotory challengers and has been avoided himself by the likes on hopkins, pavlik, jones and taylor for most of his career. You name lacy, kessler, woodhall and reid. Dont forget before calzaghe pasted lacy the americans were comparing him to mike tyson. Pavlik has only fought taylor and maranda. Dont forget he was almost beat by taylor in the first fight he looked in more trouble than taylor did when he went down and got stopped! Pavlik has been offered the fight with joe twice and not taken it now he wants to fight him. Calzaghe is by far the better boxer of the two and has proven his ability to take a punch and have the stamina to box punchers heads off for twelve rounds. Thats what would happen to pavlik! And its strange that no one is slating pavlik for fighting hopkins? I thought hopkins was an old man yet pavlik dosnt mind fighting an old man!

  8. mark Says:

    The article is spot on. Calzaghe has not fought anyone who is top of their game. If Hopkins had been younger he would of beat Calzaghe easy it was lack of work rate that lost the fight for Hopkins. Calzghe has been fighting medioca fighters for years who are only ranked by the WBO. Stop mentioning Lacey the guy was just a prospect thats it!!! he was no world beater or ranked P4P by noone. He was no Mayweather was he???

  9. Micky Says:

    No

  10. bob Says:

    What happens if hopkins beats pavlik? Will the americans give calzaghe credit then?

  11. A - Force Says:

    It would be very funny if Hopkins does beat Pavlik. All you Americans will be eating your words

Leave a Reply