Comments on: Is Calzaghe A Cherry Picker?

By: craig

craig — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:43:09 +0000

your comments are total ridiculous joe is the man.He has been world champion for over ten years.An has beating good fighters such as jeff lacy richie woodhall chris eubank charles brewer robin reid should i go on. he’s beat Numerous of good opponents the fans know he would beat all the young fighters you mentioned including you. Before you make your comments next time try lacing a pair of gloves up an stepping in that ring then make your ridicolous comments because you would relise how much he has achieved number one british boxer of time

By: jim daley

jim daley — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:06:06 +0000

awwwwwww is Lieberman a little bit annoyed about somthing? how to make yourself look ridiculously bitter in two articles…..
Let me guess your next few articles are going to be about other boxers with the occasional reference to how unworthy you think Calzaghe is? Does he make you feel insecure?

By: neil M

neil M — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:23:31 +0000

because hopkins and jones have never fought mandatory challengers right? I like the way you negelct to mention how Joe has beaten people like Eubank, Kessler, Reid, Mitchell…..
Whats the point having a rematch with kessler? Your on about him wanting to make money (oh no…how could he) BUT thats the whole point of rematches. Yes, he could fight pavlik but then wouldn’t Pavlik be the one fighting old men seeing as Calzaghe is 37? You have contradicted yourself so badly! ha

By: bazbaz

bazbaz — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:04:43 +0000

exactly when should he have fought Mclleland!? youve really outdone yourself this time michael even by your standards, why not watson aswell, in fact lets get a time machine and Joe can fight everybody at every weight since 1900.

By: kopdogg

kopdogg — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:42:48 +0000

if pavlik loses to hopkins i will quit watching boxing. please… how about we put money on it. Im gonna pay for pavliks PPV but watch JC for free so i can laugh when he loses and i didnt pay. ahaha

By: kopdogg

kopdogg — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:37:49 +0000

great article. how about he should have fought against Jermain taylor and see how he would have done if he thinks kelly isnt good enough. HAHA i guarantee JT would put up one hell of a fight if not KO Calzaghe. JT is still a big opponent i think and will see that by when he beat the crap out of somebody he knows he can beat up.. lacy. if calzaghe can beat lacy. watch JT crush him. hopefully JT gains some confidence back which he should.

By: michael bullsh*t

michael bullsh*t — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:45:23 +0000

same old michael bullsh*t

By: Ben

Ben — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:54:52 +0000

By the way Michael, ask Roy Jones yourself and I bet you he would tell you himself that he avoided Calzaghe, and not the other way round!!! Calzaghe and Steve Collins chased Jones for years but he didn’t want to know…he actually admitted it…maybe I should have your job Michael, due to the fact I know significantly more than you do about Boxing…maybe you should write about Baseball or something.

By: Hardcore

Hardcore — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:19:27 +0000

Not read this, no point, based on his previous anti-calzaghe comments. Lose this contributor; he’s totally biased & uninformed. Crap.

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:34:04 +0000

actually find out about wat your saying befor u rite it

calzaghe wanted hopkins or jones when he was way younger

he wanted them when he was stil fighting robin reid
you really do no nothing bout boxing

stop writing on hear

By: Dean

Dean — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:36:06 +0000

jermain taylor a formidable opponent?

kessler vs pavlik will answer this ongoing debate.

By: Tony.D

Tony.D — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:46:33 +0000

Hahaha, 2 quotes here that are really funny … “I’ve always been a huge fan of Calzaghe” and “the boxing fans that actually know the sport, like me”
Michael you will look so stupid if Pavlik fails to beat Hopkins, not long to go now.