By Manuel Perez: When Manny Pacquiao (47-3-2, 36 KOs) was in the process of beating David Diaz last Saturday night to win his WBC lightweight title, a question that was somehow overlooked by the boxing world was why was Pacquiao fighting Diaz, considered to be the weakest of the lightweight champions, rather than Nate Campbell, the fighter considered to be the best by far in the division. The word circulating around the boxing community is that Campbell was considered too dangerous for Pacquiao, and that he would have beaten him.
Having seen Campbell fight on many occasions, I’d have to agree with that opinion. Campbell would be simply too strong for Pacquiao, and could counter him and break him down in the fight, much like Erik Morales did in his first fight with Pacquiao in March 2005.
A lot of people believe the same as I do, that Campbell would easily beat Pacquiao if given the chance. Don’t hold your breath on waiting for that to happen, because it won’t. Let me say this once: Pacquiao will never fight Campbell. Not in this lifetime, that is. Campbell is on another level, too sturdy, too strong and with too much stamina and boxing skills to risk putting Pacquiao in with.
Campbell would close the distance, forcing Pacquiao to exchange with him. I noticed that Pacquiao would retreat backwards every time that Diaz would come forward, giving ground and hitting him while going backwards. This wouldn’t work with Campbell, who usually comes forward behind his long jab, something that Diaz failed to do against Pacquiao. This would mean that Pacquiao wouldn’t be able to get off the hook by retreating backwards, and would get hit in the face each time he does this. With this avenue cut off, Pacquiao would have to try and use lateral movement to neutralize Campbell’s superior power.
This, too, wouldn’t work because Campbell is quite adept at cutting off the ring on his opponents, and would intercept Pacquiao as he tried to maneuver around him. With these two options taken away from him, Pacquiao would only have one choice, either slug it out with Campbell for face a slow painful beat down one punch at a time. I figure Pacquiao would then elect to try and stand and trade with Campbell, even without his trainer’s advice. While we’re on the subject of trainers, I noticed that Pacquiao rarely gave his trainer Freddie Roach much of his attention in between rounds of the Diaz fight.
Instead, Pacquiao seemed solely focused on watching his slow motion high lights rather than listening to the advice given him. I foresee the same thing happening if Pacquiao were to have to face Campbell. Pacquiao would be too busy looking at himself on one of the large monitors mounted in the arena, or looking at the crowd, and would miss out on some valuable advice being given to him by his excellent trainer. Even with the advice, however, Pacquiao would have little chance at beating Campbell, but at least by actively paying attention to his trainer, he might stand a small chance of beating Campbell.
Pacquiao’s only real chance at beating Campbell would be to stand and trade with him at close range, and hope and pray that he can somehow open a bad cut on the face of Campbell, one so bad that the fight is ultimately stopped. Without that, or perhaps a landing a lucky punch, Pacquiao will get blown out of the water by the bigger, stronger Campbell. He’s simply not big enough to stand in with him for long, and would be thoroughly beaten and broken down by Campbell over the course of the bout. If Campbell can make easy work of Juan Diaz, one of the best fighters in all of boxing, he’d make an easier job of Pacquiao, who I rate a level below Juan Diaz in ability.
For that reason, I suppose Pacquiao’s management can see what I can see in looking at Campbell, and can correctly estimate Pacquiao’s chances against a fighter as tough and as skilled as Campbell, and see nothing but bad things for Pacquiao in such a matchup. If Pacquiao were to ever face Campbell, I’d be willing to guess that it wouldn’t take place until 3-4 years in the future, when Campbell, who is currently 36, is no longer dangerous as a fighter. In other words, Pacquiao would wait him out.

July 6th, 2008 at 5:20 am
For a fact, Nate Campbell is a nobody compared to the daring devil Manny Pacquiao. Just look at the resume of Pacquiao. This writer knows nothing about boxing. Learn the history and learn the real score. Pacquiao is undoubtedly the best in boxing business.
July 6th, 2008 at 8:25 am
You seem so sure about that, I elect not to believe on your so called “analysis” on the reason that I only trust opinions of experts which sad to say, you are not
I mean who the fuck are you by the way?!?
July 6th, 2008 at 8:37 am
This is one of most entertaining article I’ve read in a long while. It’s so ridiculously funny. The author must be Mexican.
July 6th, 2008 at 9:22 am
This write up is to purposely entice manny pacquiao to fight nate cambell. I believe this writer is under campbell’s promoter’s payroll. Sad to say his analysis has no basis. He hasn’t even compare relative opositions in between fighters he’s comparing like barera and campbell’s destroyer robbie peden. Come on man, THINK first if you have brains before making analysis like this!
July 6th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
YOU ARE DARN STUPID
July 6th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Nate lost to Peden, twice I think, and to Lorenzo. Very good reference for your opinion.
July 6th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
No!
July 7th, 2008 at 10:57 am
maybe one day top rank would let pacquiao fight campbell…the best lightweight and p4p fighter in the wold, along with marquez, guzman, valero, juann diaz, megatron, hulk hogan, justin timberlake, 95 chicago bulls…and he if by some miracle or fluke he gets lucky and beats them…then maybe these highly respected and knowledgeable boxing writers might consider him one of the better fighters today….MAYBE….
July 7th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
This writer will always find somebody who he thinks can beat pacman. He won’t stop until manny beats Klitschko.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Man….! the author’s assertion is no brainer at all.!
Obviously, he’s on the payroll of Campbell’s promoter (Don King). It seems he’s tryin’ to entice an argument w/o solid basis…! “The Galaxy Warrior” is schooled by Robbie Peden, Lorenzo, & a couple more of other fighters.
Time will come, MP will give his day in the RING..
Peace…!
July 8th, 2008 at 3:17 am
in the event manny ktfo campbell when they meet in the ring, this writer will again tell us that manny beat an aging campbell, just like barrera and morales hehehehehe! is there anything new? before they said that diaz will beat manny because diaz is durable. hahaha
July 8th, 2008 at 3:21 am
just wait for the top lw’s elimination for the right to face pacqiuao on the ring, then manny will eliminate whoever left standing.
July 9th, 2008 at 6:04 am
blahh blahh blahh blahh…..
Too much speculation…..
July 9th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Nate Campbell is slow. He maybe strong and durable but still slow. Speed is matter most. Diaz punches are strong too
and he got beaten because he was ssss000000 slow.
July 9th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Nate Campbell is slow. He maybe strong and durable but still slow. Speed is matter most. Diaz punches are strong too
and he got beaten because he was ssss000000 slow.
July 10th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
disgusting.no basis bias,pacman will ko nate anytime he want.
July 11th, 2008 at 9:23 pm
you know what youre just a sore loser, ill bet my whole salary that manny pacquiao will beat nate campbell and knock him out in the 3rd round.
July 16th, 2008 at 11:54 am
nagdamgo ka dong?????????
trans: are u dreaming???
July 20th, 2008 at 2:20 am
This writer got what he wants… attention. Everybody knows that Manny Pacquiao is one of the greatest if not the greatest fighter of all time.
For the writer, nice shot, but next time, think first before you write, for your name’s sake.
August 23rd, 2008 at 8:31 am
what are u talking about man! u dont know nothing but your just doing funny analysis….
September 7th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
The author has got this one completely wrong. Manny has only recently stepped up to 135lbs to beat Diaz and in his next fight will be fighting a much larger dangerous DHL. The whole premise of the article is flawed.
What is your qualification to write on this site please?
September 15th, 2008 at 1:14 am
nate is a one hit wonder.. he’s not worthy to fight the best pound 4 pound fighter of the world.. he hasn’t proven anything yet, just a narrow split decision win against juan diaz.. i doubt he would win against guzman.. joan is too good for him.. he’ll probably loss all of his belts in his fist defense… who cares? nobody knows him anyway..
May 10th, 2009 at 1:51 am
hey!!!
who’s the author…
we all know that the author of this hates MAnny…
your such a nonsense… hey !!! Diaz is stronger than Campbell… PAcquiao is faster and stronger… Are you watching a boxing match?